Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta TC1 Available Now!

2010-09-10 Thread Marius Andreiana
Will there be more nightly composes at http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ? The current one freezes after grub count down goes to 0 for me Thanks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Twitter support broken in Pino

2010-09-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > The other option would be to switch to gwibber (which has been > un-desktop-couched in Fedora 14, so it theoretically won't bring in > nearly as much to the live image. So, actual testing - building a livecd with gwibber instead of pino brings in the f

F-14 Branched report: 20100910 changes

2010-09-10 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Sep 10 13:15:24 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta TC1 Available Now!

2010-09-10 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/09/2010 05:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. This image (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/) appears to be useless for network/kickstart installs. I've pxe booted the images from there and downloaded the install.img from t

File Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-09-10 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole: 099c7d2ac40ece43c924c59c13f6b1db Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Pino & twitter

2010-09-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Arun SAG (saga...@gmail.com) said: > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192 > > This bug is now a F14 blocker. Nomintated as one; it needs to go through the normal review process. And the fix for this may not invo

Re: Pino & twitter

2010-09-10 Thread Arun SAG
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Alex Hudson wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192 > This bug is now a F14 blocker. -- Arun S.A.G -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: Pino & twitter

2010-09-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alex Hudson (fed...@alexhudson.com) said: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192 > > I read through my archive and all I can see is a short discussion > proposing changing to gwibber. > > Is anyone actively trying to get an exception for pino a la gwibber? Or > should someone

Re: *NEW* ltsp-5.2.4-1.rpms are HERE !!!!!!!!

2010-09-10 Thread Gavin Spurgeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Franta > thank for Your LTSP work! I want use LTSP on i386 server and stations, > but at URL You put are only x86_64 packages. Please, can You offer i386 > or source RPMs? I will test them. Once I have a 100% working copy for x86_64 I will build a

rawhide report: 20100910 changes

2010-09-10 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Sep 10 08:15:21 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Howarth
On 10/09/10 10:15, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 >> Matthew Miller wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Iain Arnell
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >> > But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't >> > exist on RHEL.  How do I convert a dead

Re: Darktable

2010-09-10 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello! 2010/9/10 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich : > Hi! > > Would anybody like to make a review (sponsor needed) on darktable? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 Taking this. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Darktable

2010-09-10 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Hi! Would anybody like to make a review (sponsor needed) on darktable? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589866 Dmitrij. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Pino & twitter

2010-09-10 Thread Alex Hudson
As subject: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192 I read through my archive and all I can see is a short discussion proposing changing to gwibber. Is anyone actively trying to get an exception for pino a la gwibber? Or should someone be taking up this cudgel? Ta Alex. -

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Howarth
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't > > exist on RHEL. How do I convert a dead package on the fedora side > > to a EL only set of branches?