Re: Release Notes Draft

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:45:53AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote: > A number of beats were blank, and some of them probably should be, but I > left them in the document for now as a reminder in case you are aware of > something that is missing. I will get rid of them tomorrow. Systemd needs more

Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 i386

Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386 using rawhide from 2010-09-01 Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three attempts to build. Sorry I can't mail to everyone individually this round, we've gro

Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-09-01 Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three attempts to build. Sorry I can't mail to everyone individually this round, we've g

Re: Tsclient

On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:17 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 04.09.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Christopher Brown: > > > The new tsclient 2.0 GUI is terrible and these days there are far > > superior alternatives in the form of gnome-rdp and remmina which I > > happily use and provid

Re: Release Notes Draft

On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 01:23 +0200, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 11:45 -0400, John J. McDonough a écrit : > > The wiki has been converted and a draft of the release notes is > > available at [clip] > Why i do not see D programming ? > It's there: 6.1.1 New Programming La

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-09-07)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #topic #382 Imp

Re: Release Notes Draft

Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 11:45 -0400, John J. McDonough a écrit : > The wiki has been converted and a draft of the release notes is > available at > > http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/Release_Notes/ > > for your review. The sources are up to date in git, but the translation > branch i

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010/9/6 Andre Robatino : > Check the page again, I made several edits to the instructions to simplify > them. > In particular, I broke the yum install into two separate commands, which > avoids > the libstdc++ dependency problem that previously lead to the need to use > --exclude for the Adobe R

Re: krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13

On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 > (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like > there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the > assignee of the bug... Been

[perl-Module-Signature] Created tag perl-Module-Signature-0.65-1.fc15

The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Signature-0.65-1.fc15' was created pointing to: db92678... - Update to 0.65 (#630714). -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

[perl-Module-Signature] - Update to 0.65 (#630714).

commit db9267823b329a0d0e35af84c4f696fcd7d60307 Author: Ville Skyttä Date: Tue Sep 7 00:21:26 2010 +0300 - Update to 0.65 (#630714). .gitignore |2 +- perl-Module-Signature.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 d

Re: Tsclient

On 4 September 2010 15:46, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >  On 09/04/2010 05:57 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I briefly took this over and looked at reviving this but upstream is >> dead and show little sign of revival. >> >> The new tsclient 2.0 GUI is terrible and these days there are far >>

Re: Tsclient

On 4 September 2010 17:17, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 04.09.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Christopher Brown: > >> The new tsclient 2.0 GUI is terrible and these days there are far >> superior alternatives in the form of gnome-rdp and remmina which I >> happily use and provide a better

Re: Review swap?

pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > Anyone want to do package review swapsies? > > meego-panel-datetime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204 > > Peter I've got a laundry list[1] if you want to knock a few off the list (cabal2spec and the macros make them all very similar to

Review swap?

Hi All, Anyone want to do package review swapsies? meego-panel-datetime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204 Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Koji crashes Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

On 09/06/2010 01:14 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/06/2010 05:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >>> >> >> There is a build in koji for 3.12.7 for f13 (and f14): >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=193535 >> (which not ye

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20100904 changes

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:13:11 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +, Branched Report wrote: > > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8 > > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >= > > 0:2.8 > > Yup, this is a cock

Re: Koji crashes Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

On 09/06/2010 05:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> > > There is a build in koji for 3.12.7 for f13 (and f14): > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=193535 > (which not yet in bodhi or updates-testing) I downloaded all the

Release Notes Draft

The wiki has been converted and a draft of the release notes is available at http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/Release_Notes/ for your review. The sources are up to date in git, but the translation branch is not yet complete. I will go ahead and do that this afternoon. If you could review

F-14 Branched report: 20100906 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 6 13:16:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

No Jigdo download available for F-14 Alpha

Hi, While it is announced at [1] and also in the pre-release download page, there is no .jigdo file for F-14 Alpha. Good luck! Hedayat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20100906 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 6 08:15:36 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- RackTables-0.18.4-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 claws-mail-plugins-g

disable: Would you like to enter a security context?

Hi.

Re: F14 youtube support?

On 2010-09-02, Chris Jones wrote: > > Is this problem with flash not working on x86_64 architecture limited to > Fedora or what? > I use Ubuntu 10.04 64bit as my primary operating system and have 32bit > Flash installed with wrapper inside Firefox 4.0 beta 4 and have no > problems. I have persona

Re: Koji crashes Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/05/2010 09:53 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Michal >> >> It's chromium not chrome. >> > >  As explained in the chrome bug report mentioned earlier in this thread > - there is a bug in nss-xx version 3.12.6 and earlier - please update to >

[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day 2010-09-02 Recap

Greetings, Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely covered with its bugs filed and verified. The common issue testers encountered during preupgrade has been identified to be an anaconda bug: 62