On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote:
> Em 20-08-2010 08:56, M A Young escreveu:
> > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
>
> For now, 2.6.34.3-37.fc13.x86_64 is OK for me, suspend/hibernate, sound,
> KVM works like a charm!
>
> Still n
Ilyes Gouta, Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:43:45 +0100:
> How about a very well maintained open source piece of software, such as
> WebKit
which of the two forks of KHTML is well maintained in your opinion?
Google one? (http://spot.livejournal.com/312320.html)
> and WebKit2 (http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/We
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:25 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That would likely be a bad idea. Mandriva did something similar a few
> > years back, before I left, and it was pretty unpopular and often
> > confusing for users. I lost count of
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Nevertheless, imho it should not be used to develop infrastructure for Fedora,
> because people involved in Fedora might not want to use it, because it is not
> FOSS.
The less-than-clear-future roadmap for Wave as a service brings home
exactly t
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That would likely be a bad idea. Mandriva did something similar a few
> years back, before I left, and it was pretty unpopular and often
> confusing for users. I lost count of the number of times I explained how
> to change the default fil
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 22:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> This is definitely a step in the right direction. PK should follow
> that and only display apps by default in the GUI.
That would likely be a bad idea. Mandriva did something similar a few
years back, before I left, and it was pretty unpopular a
On Thu 19 August 2010 15:01:17 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Sorry, but I don't think exposing our users to remote arbitrary code
> > execution (!) vulnerabilities just to make web apps a bit faster is a
> > reasonable tradeoff.
>
> Kevin, if you took off your FSF blindfold
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 14:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
> > > F15Feature to aim for. Ubuntu's been working on it too:
> > Of course, doing so just turns it from "
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
> >> is problematic for two reasons:
> >>
> >> a) Google Wave is dead
> >> b) Noone wants to us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/20/10 3:20 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
>> is problematic for two reasons:
>>
>> a) Google Wave is dead
>> b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
>>
>> Rahul
>
>
>
> You are requesting people participate in discussions via Google Wave. This
> is problematic for two reasons:
>
> a) Google Wave is dead
> b) Noone wants to use Google Wave. See a)
>
> Rahul
>
a) you're a troll
b) you're a troll
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproje
On 08/21/2010 02:16 AM, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote:
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines & put
On 08/20/2010 12:43 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:55 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:46:11AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>>> The "lesser of 2 evils" is no solution. Only NO evil at all will keep the
>>> user's freedom. Users should NEVER use propri
Hi all,,
before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a
work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop
(whatever the desktop is).
after some discussion, we started with some guide lines & putted them on the
wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:25 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan drgeo
> Orphan drgeo-doc
Taken.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The attached list shows currently orphaned packages in F-14. If they are
not claimed by the end of next week, they will be blocked, potentially
breaking dependencies (and causing more things to be blocked...)
If you already co-maintain the package, please step up and take it.
(If you don't, it may
Hi,
2010/8/20 Matthias Runge :
> On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>>
>> My question is because there were also some> 2.6.30 builds for
>> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
>> in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:38:59PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
>> > > F15Feature to aim for. Ubuntu's been
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:38:59PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
> > > F15Feature to aim for. Ubuntu's been working on it too:
> > Of course, doing so just turns it
Em 20-08-2010 08:56, M A Young escreveu:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>>
>> My question is because there were also some> 2.6.30 builds for
>> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
>> in combination with VMware / open-vm
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
> > F15Feature to aim for. Ubuntu's been working on it too:
> Of course, doing so just turns it from "Running code as X gives you
> root" to "Running code as X gives
On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
> My question is because there were also some> 2.6.30 builds for
> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
> in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.c
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:55 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:46:11AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > The "lesser of 2 evils" is no solution. Only NO evil at all will keep the
> > user's freedom. Users should NEVER use proprietary software, be it as
> > JavaScript or usin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:46:11AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Kevin, if you took off your FSF blindfold you would see that it's better
> > for web sites to use JavaScript. If they complied to /your/ wishes we
> > would have a thousand proprietary protocols, probably
Compose started at Fri Aug 20 13:15:48 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as po
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >=
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedor
On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 18:26, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
> > > Again, I'm sorry. Maybe it makes you feel better to know that I am
> > > feeling the sa
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Léon Keijser wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 03:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > The "lesser of 2 evils" is no solution. Only NO evil at all will keep the
> > user's freedom. Users should NEVER use proprietary software, be it as
> > JavaScript or using a proprieta
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
> My question is because there were also some > 2.6.30 builds for
> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
> in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bu
Compose started at Fri Aug 20 08:15:10 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.i686 requires libpoppler.so.6
OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires
libpoppler.so.6()(64bit)
PragmA
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:49:33 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>
> > I think "run X as user Xorg if you're on KMS" would be a fine
> > F15Feature to aim for. Ubuntu's been working on it too:
>
> Of course, doing so just turns it from "Ru
32 matches
Mail list logo
