Package Review Stats for last week ending 18th July

2010-07-18 Thread Rakesh Pandit
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 18th July were Mathias Ellert, Manuel Wolfshant and Stanislav Ochotnicky. Mattias Ellert : 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541524 a2jmidid htt

Re: I am not available

2010-07-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:05:44 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot maintain my packages or handle anything else until further > notice, because I had an accident. Yikes. Sorry to hear it... ;( Hope everything turns out ok, and if there is anything we folks in the Fedora community can do t

I am not available

2010-07-18 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I cannot maintain my packages or handle anything else until further notice, because I had an accident. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Help wanted]Migrating inadyn-mt to systemd

2010-07-18 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hallo, based on the post about the introduction of systemd in F-14 I have try to migrate my inadyn-mt package to this new init technology. It may be nice, if anyone who is familar with systemd may have a look to this package. Best Regards: Jochen S

Re: merge reviews

2010-07-18 Thread Richard Fearn
>> I just made a couple of tweaks to the "Join" page: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Join_the_package_collection_maintainers&diff=186902&oldid=185877 >> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Join_the_package_collection_maintainers&diff=186903&oldid=186902 >> >> which makes

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/18/2010 11:23 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:44 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> - Generating debuginfo packages that match up to subpackages as >>opposed to being "catch-all" super packages. >> > There is a bug for this; I would welcome anyone with th

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:44 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > - Generating debuginfo packages that match up to subpackages as >opposed to being "catch-all" super packages. There is a bug for this; I would welcome anyone with the power to reopen it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: source url when upstream disappears (geocities)

2010-07-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:41:42 -0600, Kevin wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:09:01 +1000 > David Timms wrote: > > ...snip... > > > Should I update the URL ? No. Drop it if it gives 404 Not Found. > > I was thinking to comment the original URL & Source indicating the > > original site, but then ch

Re: merge reviews

2010-07-18 Thread Richard Fearn
Hi, >> One of the links on spot's "Package Review Process" page >> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process) doesn't work - >> the Review Tracker equivalent to "Packages Currently Under Review" (it >> links to REVIEW.html but that doesn't exist). > > Odd. it works fine here. > > Whic

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-18 Thread Richard Fearn
Hi, > [richardfearn] findbugs-bcel: findbugs-bcel-javadoc-5.2-1.3.8.fc12.1.x86_64 findbugs-bcel and findbugs-bcel-javadoc can be installed independently, so I've added licence files to the -javadoc subpackage. Thanks for your work! Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: merge reviews

2010-07-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:45:40 +0100 Richard Fearn wrote: > I'm a bit late joining this discussion, but did notice a couple of > issues relating to review request links. > > One of the links on spot's "Package Review Process" page > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process) doesn't w

Re: source url when upstream disappears (geocities)

2010-07-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:09:01 +1000 David Timms wrote: ...snip... > Should I update the URL ? > I was thinking to comment the original URL & Source indicating the > original site, but then change the tagged lines to the oocities > versions. I would think it would be fine to add a note to the spe

gqview : plans to retire it

2010-07-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
GQview development has stopped in January 2007. Last stable release is from Dec 2006. Last development release is also from Dec 2006 and has not been continued in any way. The Geeqie project (package "geeqie") has taken over the development after forking GQview. They have made a 1.0 release this y

Firefox 4 repo

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Chambers
Anyone doing any builds of this during development and supplying a repo to download and install that way instead of source builds? Or is it too buggy to do at the moment? -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: Possible update of twisted to 10.1.0

2010-07-18 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:32:20 +0200 schrieb Julian Sikorski : > Dear maintainers of twisted-dependent packages, > > a while ago I asked for an update of twisted to 10.0.0. I got in > contact with the maintainer, and the problem is the huge dependency > list. Thomas (the maintainer) prefers to make

rawhide report: 20100718 changes

2010-07-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Jul 18 08:15:17 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, David Timms wrote: > On 17/07/10 08:12, Christoph Wickert wrote: > ... >> It refers to "bugs" and thus *covers* all bugs. You should first try to >> fix it yourself and upstream the fix if it's not Fedora specific. If you >> cannot fix the problem yourself, ask upstream for he