Re: gthumb now orphaned?

2010-07-16 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/17/2010 04:57 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > One of the gthumb bug (588039) has been generating a lot of duplicate bug > entries in Bugzilla -- 2.11.x versions prior to 2.11.4 fail at startup on > DRI-less systems due to a hard reliance on Clutter (the same way mutter > would fail on

source url when upstream disappears (geocities)

2010-07-16 Thread David Timms
I vaguely remember something about this, but can't find it in wiki or list archives: My upstream hasn't updated in years, but the package (glglobe) still builds for fedora and epel. Late in 2009, it appears that the upstream hosting site was closed: http://www.geocities.com (now yahoo). However,

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 09:55 +1000, David Timms wrote: > Would it it be useful for abrt to automatically submit bugs to such a > thing ? > This wouldn't pollute either fedora's or upstream bug systems, yet it > would capture vital info (backtrace) that would otherwise go missing. > With some market

Question regarding dist-git aesthetics with branches

2010-07-16 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been struggling with a particular wrinkle in dist-git, how fedpkg is supposed to reliably discover what Fedora release a packager is working on. In the CVS world, we used a "branch" file. This is OK, but I think it would be cleaner if we didn't

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-16 Thread David Timms
On 17/07/10 08:12, Christoph Wickert wrote: ... > It refers to "bugs" and thus *covers* all bugs. You should first try to > fix it yourself and upstream the fix if it's not Fedora specific. If you > cannot fix the problem yourself, ask upstream for help. Many packagers are not programmers, and even

gthumb now orphaned?

2010-07-16 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
One of the gthumb bug (588039) has been generating a lot of duplicate bug entries in Bugzilla -- 2.11.x versions prior to 2.11.4 fail at startup on DRI-less systems due to a hard reliance on Clutter (the same way mutter would fail on such systems). That bug itself is on QA, now that 2.11.5 is i

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-16 Thread Richard Fearn
> At present the script opens over 300 windows, which have to be closed > manually. I coudn't think of an automatic way of closing them; how does > AutoQA going to deal with the problem of testing GUI apps? I think wmctrl would help here. Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 603249] ocaml-mikmatch-devel does not work because the "tophide" dependency is missing

2010-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603249 Subhendu Ghosh changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Feature 14: D programming

2010-07-16 Thread Jonathan MERCIER
Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 14:32 -0600, Orion Poplawski a écrit : > On 07/15/2010 07:41 AM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > > hi everybody > > ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and > > increase his karma thanks > > link: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-16 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 21:34 -0700 schrieb Matt McCutchen: > On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 13:22 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > It is indeed documented in the wiki: "If there are bugs which you aren't > > capable of fixing yourself because they deal with intricacies of the > > source code whi

Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?

2010-07-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 07/12/2010 05:38 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Przemek Klosowski > wrote: >> If you kill all of them you'd get rid of the ones you suggested for a >> legit AutoQA tests. > > Yes I would. And I'm okay with that. Since there been no work done to > identify any script

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:48:44PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > I do not see events generated by those keys. That is, if I run "xev" I see > events for some buttons (VolumeUp, Mute) but nothing for others (ThinkVantage > and many Fn-F?? combinations). > > This is on Fedora-10, anyway. (...I kno

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
In article <20100716120023.4468b...@willson.li.ssimo.org> you wrote: > Gmail is available via POP and IMAP ... not antithetic to MUAs. The IMAP is actually pretty non-standard. Enough to be usable, but broken beyond that. The tag/folder translation is horrible. A move requires two passes to get it

Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14

2010-07-16 Thread Brandon Lozza
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 07/13/2010 11:55 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote: > >> I'm going to keep a personal note of the apps which do perform faster >> and grab the src rpm's so that I can compile them myself with LTO. > > Jakub Jelinek said that "LTO isn't really u

Re: krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13

2010-07-16 Thread Bojan Smojver
Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes: > Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes: > > > Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 > > (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like > > there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the

Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14

2010-07-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:17:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > It's pretty hard to imagine what you could preserve across builds of > nontrivially nonidentical source trees that would continue to line up at > the basic block level where it's meaningful to the compiler. Perhaps you > could do so

Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14

2010-07-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:28:46PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > I would suggest doing PGO for the following: The kernel? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packag

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Alexander Boström
tor 2010-07-15 klockan 08:58 +0200 skrev Till Maas: > How are the /etc/sysconfig/ files now used? E.g. on F12 ntpd > drops privs to ntp:ntp according to /etc/sysconfing/ntpd, but > ntpd.service file seems not to do something like this. So how about this: If /etc/sysconfig/ exists and contains an

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:42:33PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >> I have a use case which does not involve power management. >> Some keys on my Thinkpad generate ACPI events which I can assign >> to scripts run by acpid. > > Keys also all generate input events, and the

Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error

2010-07-16 Thread John5342
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 20:52, Zach Carter wrote: > On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote: >> > Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. >> >> You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, >> which should give you more clues. > > Thanks for the

[389-devel] Please review: Bug 547503 - replication broken again, with 389 MMR replication and TCP errors

2010-07-16 Thread Rich Megginson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547503 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:42:33PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > I have a use case which does not involve power management. > Some keys on my Thinkpad generate ACPI events which I can assign > to scripts run by acpid. Keys also all generate input events, and the /proc/acpi/events interface is s

Re: Feature 14: D programming

2010-07-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 07/15/2010 07:41 AM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > hi everybody > ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and > increase his karma thanks > link: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-1.2.20100706hg1653.fc13 > Is it possible to do anything useful with just ldc? [

Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error

2010-07-16 Thread Zach Carter
On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. > > You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, > which should give you more clues. Thanks for the suggestion. I did that and got a more verbose and detailed

Re: bash auto completion

2010-07-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:21:40PM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > But, I'm going to guess that you don't have the bash-completion > > package installed. That is what provides /etc/bash_completion. > I don't think this is quite true, since it looks like the contents > of /etc/bash_completion.d

Re: bash auto completion

2010-07-16 Thread Todd Zullinger
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:42 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> Jonathan MERCIER wrote: >>> why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? >>> me i add in bashrc: >>> for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done >>> >>> instead . /etc/bash_comp

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> >>> And why should acpid go away? What is there that can be used i

Re: bash auto completion

2010-07-16 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:42 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > > why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? > > me i add in bashrc: > > for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done > > > > instead . /etc/bash_compeltion => because do not wo

Re: XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in a crash backtrace

2010-07-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 19:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/615422 > > What to do with this ticket? XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in the backtrace. > What do other package maintainers do with such reports? I'd pick any one of the components and CC the maintainers of all t

Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-07-16

2010-07-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-07-16/fedora-releng.2010-07-16-17.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-07-16/fedora-releng.2010-07-16-17.01.txt Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010

XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in a crash backtrace

2010-07-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/615422 What to do with this ticket? XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in the backtrace. What do other package maintainers do with such reports? Thread 1 (Thread 1787): #0 XCloseDisplay (dpy=0x99f9c08) at ClDisplay.c:74 ext = 0x0 i = #1 0x060966e6 in pa_clien

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> How are the SSH host keys supposed to be generated with systemd? >> Currently the initscript creates them, if they do not exist. > > Well, I believe the right place to create them would be in sshd Hi Lennart, as a downstream of Fedor

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-16 Thread Christof Damian
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:29, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > [cdamian] sphinx: libsphinxclient-0.9.9-1.fc13.x86_64 this should be fixed in rawhide now -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Meeting #1 Recap 2010-07-16

2010-07-16 Thread John Poelstra
Meeting summary --- * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990&hide_resolved=1 (adamw, 16:03:18) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 (poelcat, 16:05:35) * LINK: http://tinyurl.com/2apxuo7 (adamw, 16:05:49) * ACTION: https://bug

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-16 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 7 July 2010 21:29, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > [jgu] emacs-auctex: tex-preview-11.86-2.fc14.noarch > emacs-auctex-doc-11.86-2.fc14.noarch Fixed in rawhide (emacs-auctex-11.86-3) > [jgu] shorewall: shorewall6-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch > shorewall-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch Both false positiv

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-16 Thread Hans Ulrich Niedermann
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > [ndim] nted: nted-doc-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch > nted-ntedfont-fonts-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch Fixed in nted-1.10.12-2.fc14. > [ndim] simulavr: simulavr-doc-0.1.2.6-6.fc13.noarch Fixed in simulavr-0.1.2.6-7.fc14. > [ndim] terminus-fonts:

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:39 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > > It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that > > as your server. > > Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has not > taken over all

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:39:39 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > > It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use > > that as your server. > > Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has > not taken over al

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : > It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that > as your server. Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has not taken over all our users yet. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > These days it is much easier to set up a local dovecot than try to > convince MUA authors to fix their stuff (and with squirrelmail you can > even webmailize it) It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that as y

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 15/07/2010 19:42, Till Maas a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> In contrast to SSH it is very unlikely that dovecot will run on >> non-server systems. > I am not sure how comm on it is, but I use dovecot to be able to access > the mail that is st

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/16 Colin Walters : > > But verifying a git tag is really easy too.  I just disagree with you; > if tarballs are provided, fine - if they aren't, it's trivial to use > archives of git tags. > -- Is there a script to help us to verify and pull sources from git repo? Meego project have dozens

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Chen Lei wrote: > > It seems no guideline forbid us to use tarballs extracted from > upstream repo.  I think using git repo for meego packages have more > harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is > people can validate the md5sum of the sourc

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/16 Mattias Ellert : > fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei: > >> I think using git repo for meego packages have more >> harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is >> people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless >> special case we can'

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.07.10 09:32, Hans Ulrich Niedermann (h...@n-dimensional.de) wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:18 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Note that if admins want to change the parameters passed to daemons they > > have a very easy way to do that in systemd: they can just copy the > > rp

Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide

2010-07-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:34:54 +0200, Dan wrote: > the result of the rebuild are: > > failed to build due the removed function, here I will prepare a fix > multiget > > failed to build due other problems: > audacity Likely fall-out from the recent upgrade to GCC 4.5.0 a few days ago. > plee-the-

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Mattias Ellert
fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei: > I think using git repo for meego packages have more > harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is > people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless > special case we can't find a way to get reliable souce

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/12 Kevin Kofler : > Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> I experienced this recently with another project (openSUSE's build >> service client) -- GitHub lets you download a project's tagged >> snapshots as tarballs, but Gitorious does not have this functionality. > > But on-demand autogenerated

rawhide report: 20100716 changes

2010-07-16 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jul 16 08:15:19 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ

Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide

2010-07-16 Thread Dan Horák
the result of the rebuild are: failed to build due the removed function, here I will prepare a fix multiget failed to build due other problems: audacity plee-the-bear ucblogo Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages

2010-07-16 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/11 pbrobin...@gmail.com : > > I don't agree with the easier, and the releases are all built on tags. > > Well someone will have to get the policy added to the packaging > guidelines. There's guidelines for using VC repos but not for using > tar files from other distros source packages. > > P

Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error

2010-07-16 Thread Andreas Schwab
Zach Carter writes: > Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, which should give you more clues. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F0

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-16 Thread Hans Ulrich Niedermann
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:18 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Note that if admins want to change the parameters passed to daemons they > have a very easy way to do that in systemd: they can just copy the > rpm-owned service file from /lib/systemd/system into > /etc/systemd/systemd and then make th