On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:21 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> In article <1278968533.22421.0.ca...@rosebud> you wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:51 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> >> I'm thinking we need to catch this early in mock. Any suggestions on
> >> how we should detect that we're on a 32-bit ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We're ready for the next phase of dist-git migration testing. Building!
We now have a staging koji server that has been modified to accept
builds from our test dist-git server. I've also updated fedpkg (in the
fedora-packager package) to build again
In article <1278968533.22421.0.ca...@rosebud> you wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:51 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>> I'm thinking we need to catch this early in mock. Any suggestions on
>> how we should detect that we're on a 32-bit arch and the selected
>> config is 64 bit? Brute force is just t
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > No. The bug is not an upstream bug per se until one has confirmed that
> > it exists in the upstream version, which involves getting source and
> > building it according to upstream's instructions, which adds up to
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:20:52 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 06:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle
> > the included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The
> > hope that somebody would step up and claim wordpres
The Fedora 14 Feature Submission Deadline is TOMORROW. After tomorrow,
newly submitted features will be targeted for Fedora 15 unless an
exception is granted by FESCo.
Accepted Fedora 14 features so far:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/14/FeatureList
Thank you,
John
More information
Greetings.
I'd like to remind package maintainers that there are some test
machine resources they can use to help them in maintaining Fedora
packages.
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
for more information and FAQ.
Recent changes include:
- I
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> If you kill all of them you'd get rid of the ones you suggested for a
> legit AutoQA tests.
Yes I would. And I'm okay with that. Since there been no work done to
identify any scripts yet there's no real work lost.
I agree about the ugli
On 07/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
>> Every file outside of this 'core examples' set could print the message
>> "This example's functionality may depend on the specific configuration
>> of matplotlib and other packages". Even
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Set-Scalar/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26439
Modified Files:
perl-Set-Scalar.spec sources
Log Message:
sync
Index: perl-Set-Scalar.spec
===
RCS fil
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Return-Value/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25992/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Return-Value.spec sources
Log Message:
1.666001
Index: perl-Return-Value.spec
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Return-Value/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25992/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Return-Value.spec sources
Log Message:
1.666001
Index: .cvsignore
===
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:51 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:46:35 -0500
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > yo cant build 64 bit binaries on a 32 bit box. you will need either a 64
> > bit
> > box or to setup a qemu guest thats 64 bit. not the qemu route will be slow
> > as
>
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:46:35 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> yo cant build 64 bit binaries on a 32 bit box. you will need either a 64 bit
> box or to setup a qemu guest thats 64 bit. not the qemu route will be slow
> as
> the cpu will be fully emulated
>
> The error you get is because the host
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-User-Identity/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23428/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-User-Identity.spec sources
Log Message:
0.93
Index: .cvsignore
=
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-User-Identity/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23428/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-User-Identity.spec sources
Log Message:
0.93
Index: perl-User-Identity.spec
=
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-User-Identity:
c6efb646ea66ef7c479b0eed2a24480d User-Identity-0.93.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Box/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22999/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Mail-Box.spec sources
Log Message:
2.095
Index: perl-Mail-Box.spec
===
RCS fil
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Box/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22999/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Mail-Box.spec sources
Log Message:
2.095
Index: .cvsignore
===
RC
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mail-Box:
43b86fb1bc3b0bcca713b23c1e10e95f Mail-Box-2.095.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> Every file outside of this 'core examples' set could print the message
> "This example's functionality may depend on the specific configuration
> of matplotlib and other packages". Even better, could it be in some sort
> of try/catch blo
On 07/12/2010 04:15 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
>> It doesn't look good when the application-provided examples crash. I see
>> that it's a complex issue between the upstream and packagers, but I
>> think the policy should be "it either ru
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-CaptureOutput/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20608/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IO-CaptureOutput.spec sources
Log Message:
1.1102
Index: perl-IO-CaptureOutput.spec
==
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-CaptureOutput/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20608/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-CaptureOutput.spec sources
Log Message:
1.1102
Index: .cvsignore
=
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-CaptureOutput:
367b3c0eb33a4b600de4009b0445ae0d IO-CaptureOutput-1.1102.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> There is actually a benefit to having the subpackage name be part of the
> license location, in situations where the independent subpackage name
> significantly differs from the basename of the source package, it is
> easier for someone not versed in RPM to locate the a
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [gemi] GtkAda: GtkAda-gl-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64
> GtkAda-glade-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64 GtkAda-gnome-2.14.0-5.fc14.x86_64
Those sub-libraries do actually depend on the main library, but they weren't
linked to it, which can't be right. I added the missing link options, so no
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> It doesn't look good when the application-provided examples crash. I see
> that it's a complex issue between the upstream and packagers, but I
> think the policy should be "it either runs or gives a clear message that
> it's unsupported"
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Email-Abstract/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15494/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Email-Abstract.spec sources
Log Message:
3.002
Index: .cvsignore
==
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Email-Abstract/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15494/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Email-Abstract.spec sources
Log Message:
3.002
Index: perl-Email-Abstract.spec
=
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Email-Abstract:
57d5e7a3a08441859c727946169a725b Email-Abstract-3.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said:
> >> if the reporter refuses to
> >> do that, it's only pure laziness.
> >
> > Maybe, but that's no justification to close the Fedora bug.
>
> Sure it is. If the reporter is too lazy to do even very simple tasks to get
> his/her bug fixed, why should
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Page/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13674/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Data-Page.spec sources
Log Message:
2.02
Index: .cvsignore
===
R
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Page/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13674/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Page.spec sources
Log Message:
2.02
Index: perl-Data-Page.spec
===
RCS f
On 07/12/2010 03:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>> if the reporter refuses to
>>> do that, it's only pure laziness.
>>
>> Maybe, but that's no justification to close the Fedora bug.
>
> Sure it is. If the reporter is too lazy to do even very simple tasks to get
> his/her bug fi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Page:
57f9aed8a79687a2712adf7bf2f9cc4d Data-Page-2.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On 07/11/2010 05:23 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> The only _noise_ I've seen was abrt allowing someone to report crashes
> against included example matplotlib scripts (scripts which require
> non-default matplotlib userspace configurations to work), and the abrt
> developers have solved that problem t
On 07/11/2010 09:17 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
> ABRT is introduced.
Sure, because the number of deliberate non-ABRT bug reports probably
stayed the same, and there is a ton of automatic entries. If they are
minimal, in
Start End Name
Wed 26-May Tue 03-Aug Packaging and Development (precedes Alpha)
Tue 13-Jul Tue 13-Jul Feature Submission Deadline
Tue 13-Jul Tue 13-Jul Custom Spins Submission Deadline
Thu 15-Jul Thu 15-Jul Create Installable Images for QA testing #2
Fri 16-Jul Fri 16-Jul Al
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hello Fedora!
> ==
>
> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
> fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#topic #382 Imp
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Carl, I'm not sure if you've been doing this wearing a Bugzappers hat,
> but if so, it is *not* currently part of Bugzappers policy for
> Bugzappers to make this kind of call on behalf of the package
> maintainers, as Jeff says. I appreci
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 12:47 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Carl Gaudreault
> wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464#c29
>
> I appreciate the effort to be more explicit in your reasoning by
> adding an additional comment in response to this ou
On 07/07/2010 03:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hello Fedora!
>
> Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
...
> [sandeen] e2fsprogs: e2fsprogs-static-1.41.12-3.fc14.x86_64
> libcom_err-1.41.12-3.fc14.x86_64
Added COPYING %doc to the former subpackage
Already e
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [nphilipp] gimp: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.9-5.fc14.x86_64
fixed in 2.6.10-2.fc14
> [nphilipp] xsane: xsane-common-0.997-8.fc14.x86_64
fixed in 0.997-9.fc14
> [nphilipp] extremetuxracer: extremetuxracer-common-0.4-3.fc12.noarch
> [nphilipp] u
On Wednesday 07 July 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [scop] javasqlite: javasqlite-javadoc-20100131-1.fc13.noarch
Fixed in CVS but fails to build at the moment in devel i386 (I suspect
something broken with the i386 sqlite there: #613414)
> [scop] vdr: vdr-devel-1.6.0-32.fc14.x86_64
False p
> [pknirsch] tuned: tuned-utils-0.2.14-1.fc14.noarch
Added COPYING into the package. Fixed in git. Soon will be fixed in Fedora
(with new tuned release).
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 21:29, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [john5342] ebook-tools: ebook-tools-libs-0.1.1-5.fc12.x86_64
False positive: libs subpackage contains license file and all other
ebook-tools.srpm derived packages depend on it.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who und
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [jpopelka] dhcp: 12:dhclient-4.1.1-25.P1.fc14.x86_64
>
- LICENSE file added to dhclient
> [twaugh] cups: 1:cups-libs-1.4.4-5.fc14.x86_64
>
- LICENSE.txt file moved to libs subpackage
> [twaugh] foomatic-db: foomatic-db-filesystem-4.0-17
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 16:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > ... many upstreams ignore robots. Other distros have gone through this
> > learning curve many years ago (E.g. Debian, ca. a decade ago).
>
> Then they'll also ignore a packager "playing robot". That's exactly why t
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28188/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect.spec sources
Log Message:
1.892
Index: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect.spec
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28188/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect.spec sources
Log Message:
1.892
Index: .cvsignore
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect:
f31095e39fffba972273ec895de6e3ec Lingua-EN-Inflect-1.892.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> ... many upstreams ignore robots. Other distros have gone through this
> learning curve many years ago (E.g. Debian, ca. a decade ago).
Then they'll also ignore a packager "playing robot". That's exactly why the
upstream bugs need to be filed by the actual reporter. At lea
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-SQL-Abstract/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25319/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-SQL-Abstract.spec sources
Log Message:
1.67
Index: .cvsignore
===
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-SQL-Abstract/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25319/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-SQL-Abstract.spec sources
Log Message:
1.67
Index: perl-SQL-Abstract.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SQL-Abstract:
624b404c67013b270559643d2bac0b61 SQL-Abstract-1.67.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 07/12/2010 06:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle the
> included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The hope that
> somebody would step up and claim wordpress in the FESCO ticket [1] did
> not fulfill itself and therefor
After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle the
included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The hope that
somebody would step up and claim wordpress in the FESCO ticket [1] did
not fulfill itself and therefore I am asking here for help or a new maintainer
fo
Compose started at Mon Jul 12 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ
On 07/12/2010 09:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> Ask yourself: What do we gain, if we gather all these backtraces in
>> bugzilla and then close them WONTFIX? It's more work for the users, the
>> maintainers and the bugzappers, but we gain nothing. Seems like a bad
>> deal,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> [sdz] sugar-tamtam: sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.4.20100201git.fc14.x86_64
This seems to be a false-positive. The activity subpackages all depend
on the common package, which itself contains the license file.
--Sebastian
--
devel mailing
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom \"spot\" Callaway wrote:
> [salimma] gambit-c: emacs-gambit-4.3.2-4.fc12.x86_64
> [salimma] pure: emacs-pure-0.43-2.fc14.noarch
> [salimma] vala: emacs-vala-0.9.2-1.fc14.noarch
All updated in Rawhide
Regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Cont
> [sergiopr] blitz: blitz-doc-0.9-13.fc13.noarch
Fails to build from source at the moment, trying to fix it
> [sergiopr] CCfits: CCfits-doc-2.2-3.fc14.noarch
> [sergiopr] cloudy: cloudy-doc-08.00-1.fc14.noarch
> cloudy-libs-08.00-1.fc14.x86_64 cloudy-devel-doc-08.00-1.fc14.noarch
> [sergiopr] fun
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> Bingo! The very same could be said for the maintainer. :P
>>
>> The difference between the bug reporter and the package maintainer is:
>
> * The maintainer has (literally!) hundreds of ABRT crash reports for his
> p
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> No. The bug is not an upstream bug per se until one has confirmed that
> it exists in the upstream version, which involves getting source and
> building it according to upstream's instructions, which adds up to a lot
> of work. If an upstream project has a good relationshi
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Bingo! The very same could be said for the maintainer. :P
>
> The difference between the bug reporter and the package maintainer is:
* The maintainer has (literally!) hundreds of ABRT crash reports for his
package to deal with, the reporter at most a handful.
It is ju
Till Maas wrote:
> The packager can also create a new testing package for the reporter to
> test, e.g. to verify that the bug is not yet fixed in a newer upstream
> release that is not in Fedora.
That's why I try to CC myself on the upstream bugs which are filed by our
reporters. But of course, i
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> That would be nice, but AFAIK you can't Cc: people who are not
> registered on the bug tracker.
Right, most bug trackers (at least when weighted by the number of projects
using them) don't allow CCing unregistered e-mail addresses. This is the
main problem with fo
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Assuming it's a detailed/complete backtrace accompanied with steps
> on how to reproduce something, well, I would think the same.
> Unfortunately, users still dump ABRT backtraces into Fedora bugzilla
> without adding a single comment and without replying to questions.
> U
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Ask yourself: What do we gain, if we gather all these backtraces in
> bugzilla and then close them WONTFIX? It's more work for the users, the
> maintainers and the bugzappers, but we gain nothing. Seems like a bad
> deal,
… and thus ABRT needs to learn to report those bu
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I experienced this recently with another project (openSUSE's build
> service client) -- GitHub lets you download a project's tagged
> snapshots as tarballs, but Gitorious does not have this functionality.
But on-demand autogenerated tarballs are evil because they us
72 matches
Mail list logo
