Hi, all
Grok[1][2] is a simple and interesting Web framework based on Zope
Toolkit(Zope3) and now available in the Zope SIG repo (i686, x86_64,
source).
Steps to make a trivial test:
$ wget http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/yum/zope-sig.repo [3]
$ su -c "cp zope-sig.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/"
Jeff Garzik (jgar...@pobox.com) said:
> Cute re-ordering of events, there. No, after repeated experiences
> with seeking reviews, including this most recent one mentioned
> elsewhere on this list, and seeing others on this list repeating
> review requests, I was inspired to poke around to see why
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:00 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Carl Gaudreault
> wrote:
> >>So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
> >>components without comment recently. Hmm.Not cool.
> >
> > -jef
> >
> > I gave the reason why i closed it
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Carl Gaudreault
wrote:
>>So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
>>components without comment recently. Hmm. Not cool.
>
> -jef
>
> I gave the reason why i closed it.
Are you saying that you comment in 27 requesting the report file a
r
>So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
>components without comment recently. Hmm.Not cool.
-jef
I gave the reason why i closed it.
Also, RHBZ number you are referring to?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:27 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
>> WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
>
> Look at the history
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:27 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
> WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
Look at the history. Carl G. marked it WONTFIX on 2010-06-28 without an
explanato
Hello,
I have noticed that the latest version of python-webpy package in fedora
14 rawhide is still 0.32-4.f12 while the latest upstream version is:
0.34 [1]
is there any plan to update the package ?
the current maintainer is:
Ray Van Dolson
[1] http://github.com/webpy/webpy/tarball/webpy
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> >
> > I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of
> > them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
> > has been the lack of maintainer int
> > Unresolved regressions
> > --
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
> > Subject : 2.6.35 regression
> > Submitter : Zeev Tarantov
> > Date: 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days old)
> > Message-ID :
> > References
2010/7/7 Andreas Tunek :
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it is
>> > gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of fedora is epipha
I get Empathy crashes all the time, duplicates of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464, but this bug is in
WONTFIX status. Anyone know why?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 21:19:05 +0200,
Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> Dear Fedora members!
>
> I'm happy to announce myself as the new owner of the QGIS package.
Thanks. I wanted to play with that a bit to see if I could use it for RPG
maps, but the package does a lot more.
--
devel mailing list
d
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:32:53 -0400
Ian Weller wrote:
> I got to thinking (uh oh) after reading a few threads on devel about
> there being far too many review requests and not enough packagers
> interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package
> reviews bearable for me is a checklist
Dear Fedora members!
I'm happy to announce myself as the new owner of the QGIS package.
A re-review is available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605373
Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:51 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Perhaps the best that can done is providing an example but I guess every
> package needs to have its own way implemented.
FWIW, fired up with enthusiasm I splatted a double-build
profile-generate and profile-use into hunspell as an example
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:32:53PM -0400, Ian Weller wrote:
> interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package reviews
> bearable for me is a checklist to go through. I use this one:
> http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/review.txt
> It's a derivative of somebody else's. I forgot who
I got to thinking (uh oh) after reading a few threads on devel about
there being far too many review requests and not enough packagers
interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package reviews
bearable for me is a checklist to go through. I use this one:
http://ianweller.fedorapeopl
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:47 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> >> On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> [pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
> >>>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:28:46 -0400
Al Dunsmuir wrote:
...snip...
> - All programs measured under the Phoronix benchmarks. If we don't,
> all we do is guarantee easy ways for other distributions to beat us.
Sadly, I don't think there are many phoronix benchmarks where they use
our compiled s
Hello Chen,
Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:05:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 2010/7/8 Jakub Jelinek :
>> Generally, much better speedup can be achieved by using PGO
>> (-fprofile-generate, run on some testsuite, -fprofile-use).
>> GCC itself is built that way for several years, but it would be useful
Hello Chen,
Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:05:43 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/8 Jakub Jelinek :
>> Generally, much better speedup can be achieved by using PGO
>> (-fprofile-generate, run on some testsuite, -fprofile-use).
>> GCC itself is built that way for several years, but it would be useful if
>>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:19:14 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:28:13 -0600, Kevin wrote:
>
> > So, here we are today with 242 still open merge reviews:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html
> > (Plus a few that were closed when they shouldn't have been).
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:47:41 -0400
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Cute re-ordering of events, there. No, after repeated experiences
> with seeking reviews, including this most recent one mentioned
> elsewhere on this list, and seeing others on this list repeating
> review requests, I was inspired to poke a
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:48:24 -0400
Fred Walker wrote:
> Hello:
> I hope this is the proper place for this post.
> I do not have access to DSL )-;
> Because of this I would like to make a suggestion.
> When a new Distribution is released I get the DVD with everything on
> it. The problem is after
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Python has a benchmarking suite that tries to reflect real-world
> > workloads, and I've filed
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613045
> > "RFE: Add pro
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Python has a benchmarking suite that tries to reflect real-world
> workloads, and I've filed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613045
> "RFE: Add profile guided optimization to our builds of Python 2"
> and https://bugzill
On 07/09/2010 11:32 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
[pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
>>>
>>> Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
>>>
Author: steve
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1188
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime.spec sources
Removed Files:
perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-004_locale_defaults.patch
Log
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [twoerner] system-config-firewall:
> system-config-firewall-base-1.2.25-1.fc14.noarch
system-config-firewall and system-config-firewall-tui both require
system-config-firewall-base.
system-config-firewall-base provides the COPYING file. Theref
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 00:00 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/08/2010 06:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > So I'd package up stuff, do a koji build, download it, run my
> > representative test suite, upload the result and do another build.
>
> As
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> [pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
> >
> > Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
> > COPYING file included (just checked the sp
On 07/09/2010 10:25 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
>> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
>> fixing, then email me and let me know w
On 07/08/2010 05:35 PM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> [pfj] xmms: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-11.20071117cvs.fc14.x86_64
>
> Unless something very odd is going on here, xmms-libs does have the
> COPYING file included (just checked the spec file).
>
> Could it be that there is a problem with the build sys on x86
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:30 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Hope this is helpful
> > Dave
>
>
> Is there any hints on expected gotchas that we can look out for.
> Deprecations or API changes of significant merit?
You can see the upstream not
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:39 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:02 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Here's where we are on Python 2.7 for Fedora 14: [1]
> >
> > I've updated my python src.rpm to 2.7 final (rather than the 2.7rc2 I
> > had previously):
> > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeop
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
> fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
> Thanks!
openoffice.o
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>> Hi Chen,
>>
>> As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
>> behind my MeeGo strategy.
>>
>>> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
>>> with which package
On 07/09/2010 01:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings Fedora developers...
>>>
>>
>>> c) Just leave them open and let people pick pick pick
2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
> Hi Chen,
>
> As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
> behind my MeeGo strategy.
>
>> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
>> with which package name will be more appropiate.
>> [1]https://bugzilla.redha
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
> with which package name will be more appropiate.
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
> [2]https://b
Hello:
I hope this is the proper place for this post.
I do not have access to DSL )-;
Because of this I would like to make a suggestion.
When a new Distribution is released I get the DVD with everything on it.
The problem is after the install and upgrade the new Distribution looks
to the repositori
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
> with which package name will be more appropiate.
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
> [2]https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
Joel Uckelman changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Dan Horák píše v Čt 01. 07. 2010 v 14:40 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
> devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
> apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and
> this change affects
Compose started at Fri Jul 9 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
GtkAda-devel-2.14.0-5.fc14.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 require
ons 2010-07-07 klockan 16:29 -0400 skrev Tom "spot" Callaway:
> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
> fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
> Thanks!
>
> ~spot
>
Hi all,
I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
with which package name will be more appropiate.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
[2]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610842
The packager is determined to package meego 1.0 packages for F
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Pari/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5117
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Math-Pari.spec sources
Log Message:
* Fri Jul 9 2010 Paul Howarth - 2.010806-7
- Rebuild with pari 2.3.5
- Tweak application of intn
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Pari:
6077c6db56fdd32e39a06a9bf320e1f7 pari-2.3.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On Wednesday 07 of July 2010 22:29:01 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
> fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed.
> Thanks!
>
> ~spot
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two new packages for review:
>
> teal:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
>
> ghc-feldspar-language:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
>
> Anyone interested in review swap?
I'm happy to tak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Class-C3 FTBFS : BuildRequires Self!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612875
Summary: perl-Class-C3 FTBFS : BuildRequires Self!
Produ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime - Request for EL-6 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612864
Summary: perl-DateTime - Request for EL-6 branch
Product:
Hi,
I have two new packages for review:
teal:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
ghc-feldspar-language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
Anyone interested in review swap?
Thanks!
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:28:13 -0600, Kevin wrote:
> So, here we are today with 242 still open merge reviews:
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html
> (Plus a few that were closed when they shouldn't have been).
Dumb question first: Where could I have found the URL of that page?
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8514
Modified Files:
rt3.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Jul 08 2010 Ralf Corsépius - 3.8.8-3
- Add COPYING to rt3-mailgate.
Index: rt3.spec
On 07/07/2010 10:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [harald] dracut: dracut-tools-006-2.fc14.noarch
> [harald] udev: libudev-158-2.fc14.x86_64
What's the problem with these?
$ rpm -ql dracut-tools |grep COPYING
/usr/share/doc/dracut-tools-006/COPYING
$ rpm -q --requires dracut-tools |grep dracu
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:51 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> That's not so easy to generalize. As Jakub wrote, you need some form of
> workload. After the binaries are built this workload has to be
> executed. How to do that cannot really be summarized. Some packages
> might need to be installed
On 07/09/2010 03:41 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> I started doing merge reviews in late 2008, so far I've finished 24 of
> them and have 8 reviews currently still open. The biggest problem so far
> has been the lack of maintainer interest, often nothing has happened
> after my comments. For the maj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2010 06:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> So I'd package up stuff, do a koji build, download it, run my
> representative test suite, upload the result and do another build.
As Roland wrote, if you cannot provide a self-contained RPM build
process i
64 matches
Mail list logo
