On 07/08/2010 05:05 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> 2010/7/7 Ralf Corsepius:
>> On 07/07/2010 03:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>>> After I gained so much popularity on fedora-devel, I have no courage to
>>> ask rel-eng for another
>>> favour like "remove package, which is not mine". But surely ping
>>>
On 07/07/2010 11:43 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Anybody want to trade reviews?
>>
>> My pkg isn't even new -- it's a rename from two existing, approved
>> packages (cld, chunkd) into a single merged package. So the task is
>> basically to re-ap
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [jwilson] ctrlproxy: ctrlproxy-devel-3.0.8-6.fc14.x86_64
> [jwilson] lirc: lirc-doc-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64
> lirc-libs-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64 lirc-remotes-0.8.6-5.fc14.x86_64
All better now. At least, mostly. Sent off a ctrlproxy build (I
tho
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Anybody want to trade reviews?
>
> My pkg isn't even new -- it's a rename from two existing, approved
> packages (cld, chunkd) into a single merged package. So the task is
> basically to re-approve existing Fedora work :)
>
I can do it.
We ne
Anybody want to trade reviews?
My pkg isn't even new -- it's a rename from two existing, approved
packages (cld, chunkd) into a single merged package. So the task is
basically to re-approve existing Fedora work :)
Thanks,
Jeff
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
2010/7/7 Ralf Corsepius :
> On 07/07/2010 03:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> After I gained so much popularity on fedora-devel, I have no courage to
>> ask rel-eng for another
>> favour like "remove package, which is not mine". But surely ping
>> maintainers
>> to orphan/kill these packages in w
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10810/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE perl-Template-Plu
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10810/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE perl-Template-P
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10810/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE perl-Template-Plu
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle:
ec4d89d12b0f1bb042569d2e5a92867f Template-Plugin-Cycle-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [nushio] rabbitvcs: rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3-1.fc14.noarch
>
I'm not very well versed in legalese, but rabbitvcs-core does include the
following files:
/usr/share/doc/rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/rabbitvcs-core-0.13.3/COPYI
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>
> If a subpackage is dependent (either implicitly or explicitly) upon a
> base package (where a base package is defined as a resulting binary
> package from the same source RPM which contains the appropriate
> license texts as %doc),
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [skvidal] yum-utils: yum-plugin-protectbase-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
> yum-plugin-list-data-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
> yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
> yum-plugin-versionlock-1.1.27-2.fc14.noarch
> yum-updateonboot-1.1.27-2.fc14.no
> [toshio] python-decorator: python3-decorator-3.2.0-1.fc14.noarch
Fixed
> [toshio] python-setuptools: python3-setuptools-0.6.13-5.fc14.noarch
> [toshio] python-sqlalchemy: python3-sqlalchemy-0.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64
False positives.
-Toshio
pgpcoKf44yJLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel ma
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" wrote:
> Hello Fedora!
Both fixed in rawhide:
[kevin] munin: munin-common-1.4.4-2.fc14.noarch
[kevin] xfce-utils: xfce4-doc-4.6.2-1.fc14.noarch
Thanks.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Maintainers should look at the bottom of this email for the list.
> [jfearn] publican: publican-doc-2.1-0.fc14.noarch
publican-doc includes fdl.txt in it's %files, which is the GFDL 1.2 text
previously sourced from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt
Cheers, Jeff.
I'll comaintain the following packages; already asked for permission
in the pkgdb.
> bigloo -- Bigloo is compiler for the Scheme programming language
> ffcall -- Libraries for foreign function call interfaces
> gauche -- Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling
> gauche-gl -- Op
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
> schrieb "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" :
cim-schema-docs has no license file packaged with it. /me blames the
DMTF. The content is a separate tarball. I suppose we could suck the
license file out of the other content zip (the MOF files) and include
here. Thoughts?
Hi,
My package malaga was on your list. Here are the %files entries:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_infodir}/%{name}*
%{_bindir}/mal*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_mandir}/man1/mal*
%files -n lib%{name}
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc CHANGES.txt GPL.txt README.txt
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.*
So libmal
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400
schrieb "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" :
> [tomspur] mpi4py:
> mpi4py-docs-1.2.1-3.fc14.noarch mpi4py-common-1.2.1-3.fc14.noarch
mpi4py-docs now requires mpi4py-common. The common subpackage provides
the license files and all other subpackages require now the common
pa
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
> >
> > When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> > of
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:13 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing
> > that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing
> that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We could just
> pick a word to use in the whiteboard space - AcceptedBlock
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:01 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during
> > F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be
> > compell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
>
> When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> of "ACCEPTED" or some such. That way any bug without the word is
> assumed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote:
> If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during
> F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be
> compelling. I'm a fan of solving problems with tooling, but I'm not
> convin
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> >> Tes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
>> Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
>>
>> We've run out of tim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606277
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-07
13:54:22 EDT ---
perl-Capture-Tiny-0.08-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528159
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-07
13:53:51 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.10-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-07 13:50:28 EDT ---
hct-0.7.60-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable
Author: jussilehtola
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-UPnP/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31908
Modified Files:
perl-Net-UPnP.spec
Log Message:
Sync from rawhide branch.
Index: perl-Net-UPnP.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-07 13:37:44 EDT ---
hct-0.7.60-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600026
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-07 13:38:25 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-4.fc13 has been pushed to the F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528159
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-07
13:38:20 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605662
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-07-07
13:34:38 EDT ---
perl-HTTP-DAV-0.40-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605662
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:34 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
>
> > If there are any other questions, feel free to ask.
> >
> > -w
>
> Did you get to look at the nss-softokn situation (details of which I
> sent to autoqa-devel) yet? How hard wou
James Laska said the following on 07/07/2010 05:43 AM Pacific Time:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>>> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
>>> Test Plan" testing this Thursday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I want to introduced a package into the fedora collection which
requires this package, I want to take over the ownership of this package.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Co
On 07/07/10 15:03, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 10:02 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> The guidelines should probably be updated to clarify this.
>>
>>
> I've started rewriting guidelines [1]. It should be ready for F-14. Every
> help is welcomed, especially from people having English as first
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Vcelak writes:
>
>> There were some changes in recent openldap package in rawhide, adding
>> Mozilla
>> NSS crypto support and enabling LDIF reading/writing API. This change was
>> introduced in openldap-2.4.22-3.fc14.
>>
>
>
>> Please, make sure that this chang
Author: pwouters
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-LockedFile/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11395
Modified Files:
perl-IO-LockedFile.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 07 2010 Paul Wouters - 0.23-7
- Added missing dist tag
Index: perl-IO-LockedFile.spec
Jan Vcelak writes:
> There were some changes in recent openldap package in rawhide, adding Mozilla
> NSS crypto support and enabling LDIF reading/writing API. This change was
> introduced in openldap-2.4.22-3.fc14.
> Please, make sure that this change didn't break your packages. I'm sending a
Hello everyone!
There were some changes in recent openldap package in rawhide, adding Mozilla
NSS crypto support and enabling LDIF reading/writing API. This change was
introduced in openldap-2.4.22-3.fc14.
Please, make sure that this change didn't break your packages. I'm sending a
list of pos
2010/7/6 Gérard Milmeister :
> Hi,
>
> I am still alive.
> I had always hoped to find the time to resume work on the packages,
> however it turned out that circumstances do not allow me any leisure
> anymore for serious participation (at least for now). So I would be glad
> if people take over pack
2010/7/7 Christopher Brown :
>
> If you need a co-maintainer for this please let me know. I need scons
> as a build tool for one of my packages.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Christopher Brown
> --
Feel free to contact Gérard directly to add you as a co-maintainer of scons :)
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:48:57 +0200, you wrote:
>I am still alive.
>I had always hoped to find the time to resume work on the packages,
>however it turned out that circumstances do not allow me any leisure
>anymore for serious participation (at least f
On 6 July 2010 03:13, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/18 Chen Lei :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following the process
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>
>> Is someone able to get in touch with Gérard Milmeister.(gemi)
>>
>> I can't find any activity of him from koji
On Tuesday, July 06, 2010 01:05:57 Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug
> > has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from
> > maintain
On 07/06/2010 05:59 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sad to hear that ... It was close :/
> I didn't expect to be that hard to contribute to Fedora...
>
> Good luck with your new job.
>
> Regards,
> Sylvestre
>
>
> Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 21:54 -0700, Henrique de Castro a écrit :
>
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> > Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
> >
> > We've run out of time and run way to implement
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:51:29AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 06 July 2010 at 11:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > gtkglarea2 -- OpenGL GTK widget
>
> I can take this, it's a dependency of one of my packages and I need
> to request the EPEL branches.
Go ahead. I j
Compose started at Wed Jul 7 08:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.54-22.fc14.i686 requires libdwarf.so.0.0
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 re
On 07/07/2010 09:37 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 07/03/2010 08:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> An update:
>>
>> I filed BZ's on all of those packages which haven't not already been
>> tracked as FTBS. All of these BZs are tagged as "F14Target" rsp.
>> F14FTBFS (which indirectly blocks "F14Targ
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extra
Am Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:46:44 +0200
schrieb Kevin Kofler :
> Thomas Spura wrote:
> > For me it doesn't make much sense to be co-maintainer everywhere,
> > but actually:
> > 1. doing all the tasks alone.
>
> I don't see the big problem. I'm "comaintaining" a few packages in
> that way for a while (
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611014
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 07/06/2010 10:26 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> Similarly my package perl-perlilog is now part of RHEL-6, I haven't
> got any email from its RH maintainer whether he cares to co-maintain
> it with me on fedora as well. Where is that sense of friendship Fedora
> once had ? This is disgusting !
>
>
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:53:29 +0200, Kevin wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > If some provenpackager want's to maintain it, why don't they take
> > ownership?
>
> Because I can fix the occasional broken dependency, [...]
... which hopefully will not be a problem anymore with a revised
push proces
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it is
> > gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of fedora is epiphany
> > gecko based and of the
On 07/03/2010 08:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> An update:
>
> I filed BZ's on all of those packages which haven't not already been
> tracked as FTBS. All of these BZs are tagged as "F14Target" rsp.
> F14FTBFS (which indirectly blocks "F14Target").
>
Thank for filing these bugzillas.
Perl 5.1
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote, at 07/05/2010 10:04 AM +9:00:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
>> changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
>> rebuilt.
> ...
>> seed
> Does not build
67 matches
Mail list logo
