On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
> changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
> rebuilt.
...
> seed
Does not build right now due to the reorganization of files in
gtk2-2.21.x for paral
Am Fri, 2 Jul 2010 23:47:21 +0200
schrieb Sebastian Dziallas :
> Hi all,
>
> since I'll be entering college soon, I'm revisiting my workload (I'll
> continue to work on Sugar and Etherpad). I'm using neither of the
> following applications (nodm was originally intended to be used for
> sugar-rela
On 7/4/10, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 10:40 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> > you're in now Michel
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Brandon Lozza
> > wrote:
> > ok :)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> > w
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 10:40 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> you're in now Michel
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Brandon Lozza
> wrote:
> ok :)
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:40:20 +0200, Till wrote:
>
> > > It's fairly easy to verify other broken deps, too:
> > > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/compat-db-4.7.25-3.fc13
> >
> > For me it is not that easy, because the infor
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Till Maas wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> >
>> >> Could a flag be added to only out
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> you're in now Michel
Thanks, let's move the discussion to the Bugzilla item.
--
Michel
PS the convention in development mailing lists is normally to
bottom-post, not top-post -- it makes reading a long thread much
easier. Please refrain fro
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/4 Michel Alexandre Salim :
>> I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
>> it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
>> %check. The odd thing is, up to F-13 the same checks fail, but fo
2010/7/4 Michel Alexandre Salim :
> I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
> it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
> %check. The odd thing is, up to F-13 the same checks fail, but for
> some reason the failure does not generate an error
I just fixed an ImplicitDSOLinking FTBFS for ember, but noticed that
it's still not building in Rawhide due to xmllint validation errors in
%check. The odd thing is, up to F-13 the same checks fail, but for
some reason the failure does not generate an error number that is
propagated back to rpm, an
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:40:20 +0200, Till wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to verify other broken deps, too:
> > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/compat-db-4.7.25-3.fc13
>
> For me it is not that easy, because the information is confusion (or not
> clearly arranged) or not directly accessible, e.
you're in now Michel
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> ok :)
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim <
> michael.silva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
>> > http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS
>> > http://www.pwn
ok :)
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim <
michael.silva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> > http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS
> > http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/RPMS
> > Working F13 packages are available if anyone wants to try or make
>
Compose started at Sun Jul 4 08:15:10 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requir
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:06:08PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:32:14 +0200, Till wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
> > > also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + u
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:32:14 +0200, Till wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
> > also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
> >
> > One can quickly see that several (if not many) of t
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:22:16 +0200, Till wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > And there would be drawbacks, too, for a hardcoded "Req => BR" rule.
> > It would make circular deps impossible: Pkg A requires Pkg A-extras,
> > and Pkg A-extras BR Pkg A. I
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
> also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
>
> One can quickly see that several (if not many) of them are due
> to orphans/retired packages in Fedora 12. And
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> >> Could a flag be added to only output the package names, so that I can
> >> pipe the outpu
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> And there would be drawbacks, too, for a hardcoded "Req => BR" rule.
> It would make circular deps impossible: Pkg A requires Pkg A-extras,
> and Pkg A-extras BR Pkg A. It would make bootstrapping a dist more
> complicated.
For
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 12:33:56 +0200, Michel wrote:
> This is not semantically part of building, though. I see two possible
> solutions:
> 1. Koji should check the explicitly-listed Requirements and refuse to
> build a package if these
>are not available
As I wrote in the previous msg, it would
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/SRPMS
> http://www.pwnage.ca/dist/RPMS
> Working F13 packages are available if anyone wants to try or make comments
> on them. (Might not meet package guidelines yet)
>
Create review requests, Cc: me on them and I'll
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>> Could a flag be added to only output the package names, so that I can
>> pipe the output directly to yum? Or even better, have that flag
>> automatically cause the bodhi
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:35:20 +0200, Till wrote:
>
>> > 1) To make such run-time deps BuildRequires would be helpful (because it
>> > doesn't make much sense to build something for a target that is missing
>> > something). Several broken de
Broken deps in Fedora 13 + updates + updates-testing when
also enabling Fedora 12 + updates + updates-testing.
One can quickly see that several (if not many) of them are due
to orphans/retired packages in Fedora 12. And due to violated upgrade
paths (e.g. compat-db):
Summary of broken packages
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:35:20 +0200, Till wrote:
> > 1) To make such run-time deps BuildRequires would be helpful (because it
> > doesn't make much sense to build something for a target that is missing
> > something). Several broken deps in old dist branches have been because
> > of a discrepancy b
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:32:16AM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Could a flag be added to only output the package names, so that I can
> pipe the output directly to yum? Or even better, have that flag
> automatically cause the bodhi client to invoke yum with
> --enable-repo=updates-testin
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:21:22 +0200,
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> The added complication is that the criterion is when the package was last
>> touched before being orphaned (and some people say it should be when it was
>> last touched by
28 matches
Mail list logo
