Headsup that I built gettext-0.18.1.1 for rawhide
and also a build for f13 updates-testing.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gettext-0.18.1.1-0.1.fc13
Please report any problem in bugzilla or Bodhi.
Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 13:18 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > After yum upgrade from f12 to f13, I see the video play back stop
>> > working (play back window is black and the progress bar see
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
> it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
> time.
>
> Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
> that will r
Getting back to the topic of this original email...
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 09:40, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> pidgin-2.7.1-2.fc13 obsoletes pidgin <= 2.7.1-1.fc13, is that meaningful?
Yes, it's meaningful because it allows updates to pidgin > 2.7.1-1 to
pull in the pidgin-evolution package without r
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:59:30 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Now, if the policies that are being approved do not actually
> > benefit the greater good of the community, we have bigger problems.
>
> Yet that's exactly the problem we're having. :-(
snip...
> So why are we now going to use the
It's been a while since I last updated folks on dist-git, and in reality
it's been a while since I last worked on it. Fedora 13 took up all my
time.
Since my last update we've made great progress on fedpkg, the new tool
that will replace the make system. It is packaged up with
fedora-packager an
* Kevin Kofler [10/06/2010 17:21] :
>
> Why are we trying to emulate the failed Fedora Legacy
> process rather than the successful Fedora Extras one? Why can't we learn
> from our past?
I think you're rather quick to conclude that Extras succeded because it
allowed maintainers to
I think you guys are experiencing the infinite loop bug
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:07:16 +0200, Kevin wrote:
>
>> > It fails for a Yum install. I warn about such competing Obsoletes, because
>> > they strictly require the user to go the "
Compose started at Thu Jun 10 17:54:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
condor-7.4.2-1.fc13.i686 requ
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:49:24AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
> series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
> http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
>
dmalcolm just went on vacation. He has python-2.7 packages r
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:10:36PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Josh Boyer wrote:
>> There are a number of people who disagree with the value of that goal,
>> including most of the past and current FESCo.
>
>You conveniently ignored the part of the mail where I pointed out WHY that
>goal is broken.
> I guess you've hit the same bug as me, I even have the same video
> card.
> ...
> Michal
Michal: Seems pretty similar to me too. In any event, per the prior
suggestion, I filed the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602492
Seems like we have gotten past t
> I guess you've hit the same bug as me, I even have the same video
> card.
> ...
> Michal
Michal: Seems pretty similar to me too. In any event, per the prior
suggestion, I filed the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602492
Seems like we have gotten past t
Josh Boyer wrote:
> There are a number of people who disagree with the value of that goal,
> including most of the past and current FESCo.
You conveniently ignored the part of the mail where I pointed out WHY that
goal is broken. Why are we trying to emulate the failed Fedora Legacy
process rath
- "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 13:18 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > After yum upgrade from f12 to f13, I see the video play back stop
> > working (play back window is black and the progress bar seems to be
> > always at 0) with banshee and totem. Flash pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602616
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961
> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? Is
> there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait patiently
> until something happens? I was su
Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 01:49 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python
>> 2
>> series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
>> http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
>>
>
> If i remember correctly the plan is to move to
2010/6/10 Steve Traylen :
> 2010/6/10 Michał Piotrowski :
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2010/6/10 Phil Knirsch :
>>> On 06/10/2010 01:49 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
http://doc.python.
2010/6/10 Michał Piotrowski :
> Hi,
>
> 2010/6/10 Phil Knirsch :
>> On 06/10/2010 01:49 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
>>> series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
>>> http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
>>>
>>
>>
Hi,
2010/6/10 Phil Knirsch :
> On 06/10/2010 01:49 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
>> series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
>> http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
>>
>
> If i remember correctly the plan is to mo
On 06/10/2010 01:49 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
> series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
> http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
>
If i remember correctly the plan is to move to python-3.x at some point.
Now th
python 2.7 seems to have a number of exciting improvements for the python 2
series. Any plan to introduce it into fedora?
http://doc.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600631
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata 2010-06-10 07:21:04 EDT ---
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBD-SQLite-1.29-1.fc13?
2010-06-02 14:02 keltezéssel, Petr Lautrbach írta:
> On 06/02/2010 12:56 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2010-05-12 17:07 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>>
I'm looking for information, how to get a package (in my case:
syslog-ng) updated to the latest available versio
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:59:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Luke Macken wrote:
>> Neither of you have mentioned "your" definition of the word "success".
>> Care to enlighten us?
>
>Success is the achievement of a worthwhile goal. If the original goal which
>was set is worthless, "succeeding" at
On Thursday, June 10, 2010 00:31:20 Charles Butterfield wrote:
> I suspect the nouveau driver is swapping or mislabeling the two video
> streams that the NVS-290 card generates. Here are my clues:
>
> Setup
> - Fedora-13 and nouveau driver (latest yum updates as of midnight)
> - NVIDIA NVS-290 vi
27 matches
Mail list logo
