2010/5/28 Rahul Sundaram :
> Hi
>
> Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to
> rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags
> sub package. I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then
> dropped. Do we need a flags sub package anymore? Seems ra
tor 2010-05-27 klockan 20:10 +0400 skrev Peter Lemenkov:
> %if 0%{?el4}%{?el5}
> echo "This is either RHEL 4 or RHEL 5"
> %else
> echo "EL-6 or Fedora"
> %endif
Absolutely. New EL releases are much more likely to be similar to recent
Fedora releases than to the previous EL release. This is also t
Hi,
ATM, I am observing this:
# repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.i686
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/li
Peter Robinson wrote:
> You can download it from its spin page here
> http://spins.fedoraproject.org/moblin/
"a hardwaer and usage model independent layer"
What's "hardwaer"? ;-) I think you mean "hardware". :-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Jon Masters wrote:
> Didn't we "decide" that Fedora was intended for more technical users? I
> don't see many technical users crying out for a hammered shut init
> system where they feel like they have to go to their auto mechanic to
> attach the right magic dongle to fix it when it breaks.
A real
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Looks like (ex-)maintainer did not build the fix for Rawhide, but
> created the tag. Is it better to
> 1) ask rel-eng to untag it,
> 2) just do a 2.fc13.1 update,
> or
> 3) do a call-out for anyone who uses drpython to unorphan this package?
2) is what needs to be d
On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:29:59 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to
> rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags
> sub package. I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then
> dropped. Do we need a fla
Hi Fedora!
Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on the Fedora Project
Contributor Agreement (FPCA). We listened to your concerns, and have
amended the draft slightly.
Here are the key changes that we've made:
1) We removed undefined references to "free".
2) We replaced the term "elect
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Didn't we "decide" that Fedora was intended for more technical users? I
> don't see many technical users crying out for a hammered shut init
> system where they feel like they have to go to their auto mechanic to
> attach the right magic dongl
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-05-28/fedora-releng.2010-05-28-17.10.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-05-28/fedora-releng.2010-05-28-17.10.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-05-28/
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> > You're suggesting hammering shut the insides of linux to stop people
> > playing around and reducing freedom - sounds like you want Fedora to be
> > like the products of other large propitiatory systems.
>
> C code
On 05/28/2010 07:54 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> file it and we'll get it changed to be a more helpful msg.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597336
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 10:40 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 09:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > authentication; the same applies to any user account subsequently
> > granted those privileges by the system administrator."
>
> Ah, OK, and this includes being added to *any* non-de
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 05:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/28/2010 05:23 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > protect packages is no-more!
> >
> > we've merged the functionality into core yum to keep people from
> > shooting themselves in the foot
> >
>
> There is something misleading about what it
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 22:50 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 22:43 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:46 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > > On 5/27/10 2:11 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > > On 27/05/10 17:48, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > > >> bugzilla.red
Arriving fashionably late the Fedora Moblin spin is now here.
Its based on the Moblin 2.1 UX.
You can download it from its spin page here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/moblin/
With MeeGo 1.0 Netbook out I'm now reviewing what is required to get
the UX into Fedora. Details and updates regarding
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 09:24 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>> This is fairly obvious, but I couldn't find anything in bugzilla, so
>> I'll mention it here. I have a docking station and an LCD monitor
>> connected to it. When I dock, I ha
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 09:24 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> This is fairly obvious, but I couldn't find anything in bugzilla, so
> I'll mention it here. I have a docking station and an LCD monitor
> connected to it. When I dock, I have two screens -- one that's
> attached to my laptop, another
Hi, all:
This is fairly obvious, but I couldn't find anything in bugzilla, so
I'll mention it here. I have a docking station and an LCD monitor
connected to it. When I dock, I have two screens -- one that's
attached to my laptop, another that is external. That part works fine.
However, I run into
Compose started at Fri May 28 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requ
Hi
Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to
rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags
sub package. I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then
dropped. Do we need a flags sub package anymore? Seems rather pointless.
Rahul
--
devel m
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 09:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> authentication; the same applies to any user account subsequently
> granted those privileges by the system administrator."
Ah, OK, and this includes being added to *any* non-default groups I
guess?
Thanks for clarifying.
Tim.
*/
sign
On 27/05/10 21:07, seth vidal wrote:
--snip--
>
> that's going to be up to the pk maintainer(s).
>
> but I don't think moving to distro-sync necessarily makes sense there.
>
> distro-sync is mostly valuable for folks playing between two releases.
>
> -sv
>
>
or someone with a local repo on a
but not on all rhel/centos-5 so i suggest:
%if 0%{?rhel} > 5 || 0%{?fedora}
for rhel6 and fedora since now all fedora is at least 11 and usually
rhel6 and fedora packages are compatible with eachother all other case
the "old" (4,5) rhel releases.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 19:44, Kevin Kofler wrote
24 matches
Mail list logo
