Top two FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last weeks ending 23rd May were
Alexander Lurtakov and Pierre-YvesChibon.
Alexander Kurtakov : 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
Correction in subject. From 21st Feb to 15th May (apx 11 weeks).
On 24 May 2010 11:10, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> Thanks Mamoru Tasaka, Chris Weyl, Parag AN, Emmanuel Seyman, Alexander
> Kurtakov, Steve Traylen, Martin Gieseking Terje Røsten and Christoph
> Wickert for being active in review process
Thanks Mamoru Tasaka, Chris Weyl, Parag AN, Emmanuel Seyman, Alexander
Kurtakov, Steve Traylen, Martin Gieseking Terje Røsten and Christoph
Wickert for being active in review process over last 11 weeks ending
15th March.
Mamoru Tasaka : 32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5638
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 08:50 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2010 02:45 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>>
If you *just* want to rebuild, 'rpmbuild --rebuild
kernel-package.src.rpm
Genes MailLists writes:
> On 05/23/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and
>> fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time.
> But a release really should be boot strapped with itself once when it
> ge
On 05/23/2010 08:50 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 05/23/2010 02:45 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> If you *just* want to rebuild, 'rpmbuild --rebuild
>>> kernel-package.src.rpm' is even simpler. You only need to install the
>>> srpm bits if
Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> To be clear, this is fedora.
>
> RHEL is in the next door!
+1
Please do not ship old crap just to comply with the LSB. Due to how the LSB
works, the LSB follows what we do (since Fedora's stuff eventually ends up
in RHEL and RHEL is one of the distros the LSB looks
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 02:45 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
>> If you *just* want to rebuild, 'rpmbuild --rebuild
>> kernel-package.src.rpm' is even simpler. You only need to install the
>> srpm bits if you're going to actually change something. It only
On Sun 23 May 2010 5:22:19 am Rawhide Report wrote:
> kobby-1.0-0.3.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinfinity-0.3.so.0
> kobby-1.0-0.3.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinftext-0.3.so.0
> libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinfinity-0.3.so.0
> libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b4.fc13.i
Good evening,
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Robert Scheck wrote:
> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I have filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588053
>
> Does somebody know how to contac
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 17:21:36 -0400,
Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and
> > fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time.
> >
> > -Mike
>
> But
On 05/23/2010 02:45 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> If you *just* want to rebuild, 'rpmbuild --rebuild
> kernel-package.src.rpm' is even simpler. You only need to install the
> srpm bits if you're going to actually change something. It only gets
> complex if you want to patch things, modify config optio
On 05/23/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> I don't think anyone thinks rebuilding the builders every 6 months (and
> fixing all the bugs that comes with that) is a good use of their time.
>
> -Mike
But a release really should be boot strapped with itself once when it
gets stable en
OggConvert made a release today that adds support for Web-M and fixes Dirac
support, so that will allow people with the WebM enabled in GStreamer to
convert to it... At least now we have a working free software converter that
can be included in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>
>> I'm well aware that many people have different tastes about font
>> readability and that I'm probably out of the majority (who
>> wants "like on Windows" rendering). This awarene
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> I'm well aware that many people have different tastes about font
> readability and that I'm probably out of the majority (who
> wants "like on Windows" rendering). This awareness was actually
> the reason of my post: to have guys remember
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:35:04PM -0700, JD wrote:
>> On x86 (32 bit) notebook:
>> After running make xconfig, and make all, I got this error:
>
> You need a completely different procedure to build fedora kernel packages.
>
> http://fedor
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 11:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > And it causes a load of obscure Koji-specific bugs which require
> > workarounds just for Koji builds. This was the latest one:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-de...@nongnu.org/msg252
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 11:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> And it causes a load of obscure Koji-specific bugs which require
>> workarounds just for Koji builds. This was the latest one:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-de...@nongnu.org/msg25242
On 05/16/2010 11:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> And it causes a load of obscure Koji-specific bugs which require
> workarounds just for Koji builds. This was the latest one:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-de...@nongnu.org/msg25242.html
> Hopefully those builders can be upgraded to RHE
Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 04:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I've been told (though this may well be inaccurate) that the LSB
>> requires libjpeg 6b. If so, that would pose a problem for adopting
>> the non-ABI-compatible version 8. In any case I'm not eager to force
>> a recompile o
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
>> My experience has always been that the autohinter is way better than
>> all the bci stuff.
>
> Mine tells a different story, especially when dealing with standard'
> fonts such as Arial, Tahoma and even Courier New.
>
> What I'd like to see is a true, fully
On 05/23/2010 04:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been told (though this may well be inaccurate) that the LSB
> requires libjpeg 6b. If so, that would pose a problem for adopting
> the non-ABI-compatible version 8. In any case I'm not eager to force
> a recompile of everything that depends on it ..
Now we have those libs in repo
libpng10 for libpng1.0
libpng for libpng 1.2
libjpeg for libjpeg 6b
Is it possible to package all version of libjpeg and libpng parallelly as
libpng and libpng10? redhat-lsb only depends on soname, if we package
multi-version, it won't break anything. Maybe we can r
Sorry - there is reticence to update from something that is 12 years
old ... did I understand that correctly .. if so I am stunned.
gene
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Roberto,
> My experience has always been that the autohinter is way better than
> all the bci stuff.
Mine tells a different story, especially when dealing with standard'
fonts such as Arial, Tahoma and even Courier New.
What I'd like to see is a true, fully featured font rendering
experience
Hi Xoze,
ClearType is a tech. for subpixel rendering that targets LCD screens, isn't it?
Xft/Cairo patching is then a different feature for Fedora 14, than the
bci vm being turned on by default in FreeType.
Regards,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> On W
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> early in the F13 cycle, we enabled the bytecode interpreter in our
> freetype package, since the patents on that have expired last fall.
> Unfortunately, it turned out that many free fonts don't actually benefit
> from this, and actually look worse with the bci.
Compose started at Sun May 23 08:15:16 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
SolarModel-2.1-7.fc14.i686 requires libIrrlicht.so.1.6
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 requires
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:35:04PM -0700, JD wrote:
> On x86 (32 bit) notebook:
> After running make xconfig, and make all, I got this error:
You need a completely different procedure to build fedora kernel packages.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
I found the description somewha
On 05/22/2010 11:41 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 17:55:39 +0200,
> Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> hi there,
>>
>> Can it be updated to upstream version in rawhide ?
>
> Normally you want to file an RFE bug against the package. That way the request
> doesn't get lost. (It s
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> So far response from the community has been very positive, but we didn't
> have a fedora-devel discussion about this yet, so we'll have to see
> whether we can somehow make the broader community as enthusiastic about
> the whole idea as I am. ;-)
I, for one, think syste
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been told (though this may well be inaccurate) that the LSB
> requires libjpeg 6b.
It is NOT a goal of Fedora to be LSB-compliant. It IS a goal of Fedora to
ship the latest available Free Software. So please upgrade libjpeg in
Rawhide to the current upstream version.
> In
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> > (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run
>> > and /var/lock).
>> >
>>
>>
redhat-lsb 4.0-2 is broken now, the author add requires after %description.
See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1768691
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
> systemd package available here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/
Thanks!
> Please be patient. To quote myself: "I'll publish the numbers of a 100%
> socket-activated boot soon."
I won't miss that.
Regards,
Ilyes Gouta.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Richard Hughes
36 matches
Mail list logo
