On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 20:09 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 01:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > A solution, flags!
> >
> > Well, we should carefully consider the disadvantages of that change. For
> > example, one thing we will lose with a flag-base
Rawhide Report wrote:
> mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> ---
> * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> - Rebuild for protobuf ABI change
> - Added redhat-lsb to the Requires for murmur
As already noted by Rahul Sundaram when this change was made in CVS, redhat-
lsb is NOT a valid depen
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 21. 05. 2010 v 03:29 +0200:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> >> Why can the package not come with it's schema precompiled?
> >
> > Because they all go into a single binary file.
>
> Yuck! Hello, registry! :-/
>
> What
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 03:29 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> >> I sure hope this is solved somewhat intelligently and does not compile
> >> each and every schema on every installed package. Whatever it is that
> >> gc
On 05/21/2010 07:05 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>
>
> 2010/5/21 Patrice Dumas mailto:pertu...@free.fr>>
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:56:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > Any other recommendations? Otherwise I am dropping yelp
> dependencies in
> > rawhide.
>
> I added a d
On 05/21/2010 06:59 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>> Because they all go into a single binary file.
>>
> Yuck! Hello, registry! :-/
>
> What's next? Dumping the data into the same binary as the infamous registry
> does?
>
Kevin,
Can you drop with the habit of thro
2010/5/21 Patrice Dumas
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:56:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > Any other recommendations? Otherwise I am dropping yelp dependencies in
> > rawhide.
>
> I added a dependency on yelp in gnochm because I thought that having a
> click on the help button leading to
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
>> I sure hope this is solved somewhat intelligently and does not compile
>> each and every schema on every installed package. Whatever it is that
>> gconf is doing on updates/installs now is bad enough.
>
> Yes, it
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell
> script.
> Is there some variant of %include or similar?
AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once for
the specfile itself and once for the .macros f
Jon Masters wrote:
> As a technical user, it's another thing I immediately have to "fix"
> post-install,
Yeah, this is one of the first things I change after installing Fedora,
(along with disabling SELinux and switching KDE to the classic menu instead
of Kickoff).
Kevin Kofler
--
dev
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> skvidal and I are working on a builder for third party add on repositories
> for Fedora. That builder would be separate from koji and would, indeed
> use a vm for building.
Yet another one? We already have Plague and Koji, what would the new one
offer over those? Would i
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Just stick by it. The next version of yelp will use webkit.
But webkitgtk is still an extraneous dependency of significant size on the
KDE spin.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On x86 (32 bit) notebook:
After running make xconfig, and make all, I got this error:
.
.
.
.
LD drivers/video/console/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/video/console/fbcon.o
drivers/video/console/fbcon.c:3537: error: expected declaration
specifiers or '...' before string constant
drivers/video
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Really? I don't think there's *that* many cases where a negative piece
> of karma is filed between the submission and the push which you'd want
> to ignore.
I think there are actually very many. We get a lot of invalid -1 votes for
KDE updates (issues which have been ther
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The longer it takes to push packages into a repo, the longer the window
> that creates the race condition. It could be that the push has completed
> 98% of the stuff that needs to be done, and a tester would vote -1 late
> because of a show-stopper bug in one package.
>
>
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> No change in normal process. Just 2-3 days extra between this
> particular case in which a nack (-ve karma) is received between
> maintainer requesting a push for stable and rel-eng submitting it. It
> will prevent `race condition` where say maintainer wants to pull it
> back
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 22:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 06:49 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> >
> >
> > What is the recommended method? Two of the packages - deja-dup and
> > simple-scan are mine and I have gotten a bug report to drop the Yelp
> > dependency on deja-dup.
> >
> >
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 01:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > A solution, flags!
>
> Well, we should carefully consider the disadvantages of that change. For
> example, one thing we will lose with a flag-based solution is the
> transitiveness of blocking a tracker bug. So we'
Till Maas wrote:
> A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that
> there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is
> perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the
> package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the mainta
Adam Williamson wrote:
> To answer the question someone posed earlier in the thread, when I was
> doing a lot of testing of various F13 RC2 installs yesterday, none of
> them - not the default desktop install from DVD, the desktop spin, the
> KDE spin or the Xfce spin - had more than 12 updates ava
Jesse Keating wrote:
> A solution, flags!
Well, we should carefully consider the disadvantages of that change. For
example, one thing we will lose with a flag-based solution is the
transitiveness of blocking a tracker bug. So we'd lose the KDE, X11, kernel
etc. trackers or at least not have the
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> This is also wrong because we want 0%{?rhel} <= 5.
>
> To avoid having to specify negation I'd also reverse the condition:
>
> %if 0%{?rhel} >= 5 || 0%{?fedora}
> BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel
> %else
> BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers
> %endif
I'd spell the condition as:
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Which don't have principal headquarters of their sponsor in US (but on
> the Isle of Man, which was chosen exactly because of its lax legal and
> especially tax, true, regime). Instead of comparing with Ubuntu, how is
> our configuration more complicated than OpenSuSE, which is
On 05/21/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> People are asking you to drop the dependency for a reason. Please do it.
> Let's fight dependency bloat!
>
Blindly dropping dependencies and breaking the help menu items is not a
way to fight so called dependency bloat. Anyway as you are already
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Not all of the packages that use Yelp actually depend on it and the
> current package list seems completely arbitrary.
The reason dependencies on yelp are considered harmful is that they were
dragging yelp, and with it the entire xulrunner stack, onto non-GNOME spins
(whi
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard t
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> It's too bad that we can't say that Fedora 13 has all these cool things.
> Fedora would get some considerable notoriety for being the first to fully
> support it. Then again, we cannot fully support it for HTML5 since Firefox
> doesn't have it... And Chromium is s
to, 2010-05-20 kello 21:11 +0200, Alain Portal kirjoitti:
> How stupid I am, this isn't the problem I wanted to report.
> Here is the real one:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2199881
/builddir/build/BUILD/piklab-0.15.8/po/cs.po:7626: keyword "msgctxt"
unknown
/builddir/build/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=415519&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=415519&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> +1
>
> -AdamM (from Android )
>
> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>
> And with the amount of coordination needed to m
On 05/21/2010 01:38 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:56:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Any other recommendations? Otherwise I am dropping yelp dependencies in
>> rawhide.
>>
> I added a dependency on yelp in gnochm because I thought that having a
> click on th
+1
-AdamM (from Android )
On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
And with the amount of coordination needed to make sure all the stuff is
in the right place for making youtube work,
I just built python-2.6.5-9.fc14 into rawhide.
In theory, most users should see no change relative to -8.fc14
However, I've done some major surgery to the insides of the src.rpm and
how the build works; we've gained a python-debug subpackage, containing
an alternate python build that adds a ton o
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:56:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Any other recommendations? Otherwise I am dropping yelp dependencies in
> rawhide.
I added a dependency on yelp in gnochm because I thought that having a
click on the help button leading to a window with an error message
is not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-20
14:37:57 EDT ---
perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.14-2.fc13.1 has been submitted as
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/22resfg
>
> Currently I see 77 bugs on this list, I'm sure maintainers who haven't
> been able to fix things yet would love provenpackgers to step in and
> help out. :)
Awesome. Lets see if I can earn my security bugfix meri
Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 00:28:31, Dennis Gilmore a écrit :
> On Wednesday 19 May 2010 03:10:56 pm Alain Portal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get some problems to update piklab in Fedora.
> > Some buildings succeed, other failed, the only real difference is the
> > Fedora version...
> >
> > Success:
> > F
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> > > points' concept.
>
> > ... which is derived from th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594464
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2010-05-20 14:30:44 EDT ---
Updating to latest upstream version would pull in updated dependenci
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> > points' concept.
> ... which is derived from the feature list.
Yup. Derived from. The point is that it's *not* the s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to
insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora 11]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594464
S
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-IRC/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26672
Modified Files:
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
Added Files:
0001-apply-fixes-for-rhbz-591215.patch
Log Message:
* Thu May 20 2010 Iain Arnell 6.14-1.1
On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> points' concept.
>
... which is derived from the feature list.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-IRC/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26184
Modified Files:
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
Added Files:
0001-apply-fixes-for-rhbz-591215.patch
Log Message:
* Thu May 20 2010 Iain Arnell 6.14-2.1
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-POE-Component-IRC/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25889
Modified Files:
perl-POE-Component-IRC.spec
Added Files:
0001-apply-fixes-for-rhbz-591215.patch
Log Message:
* Thu May 20 2010 Iain Arnell 6.14-4
-
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
> >
> > I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> > a feature page really makes sense.
>
> Well, it's pr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
Evert changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
--- Comment #1 from Evert 2010-05-20 13:49:07 EDT ---
appologies
this is a duplicate upgrade request...
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pls upgrade mldonkey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594454
Summary: pls upgrade mldonkey
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
On 05/17/2010 06:49 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>
>
> What is the recommended method? Two of the packages - deja-dup and
> simple-scan are mine and I have gotten a bug report to drop the Yelp
> dependency on deja-dup.
>
> Rahul
>
>
>
> I think it's the same case as man page, packages w
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
> sure
> a feature page really makes sense.
This happens with a lot of our features anyway, but it does make a nice
talking point and media splash to announce Fedora 14 i
On 05/11/2010 10:03 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:47 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
>>
>>
>> 2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram
>> Hi
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>>
>> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The cur
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:10:39 -0800
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla
> wrote:
> > Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
> > there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that
> > query in my bookmarks and peek at it eve
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
>>>
>> Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
>>
>> Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
>
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
>>
> Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
>
> Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
> ... [a lot left out]
> With regard to patents,
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard to patents, VP8 copies way too much from H.264 for anyone
sane to be comfortable with i
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
> >
> > I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> > a feature page really makes sense.
>
> Well, it's pr
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
>
> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> a feature page really makes sense.
Well, it's probably useful to list it simply from a PR/marketing
standpoint.
Does to
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > * Gstreamer plugins - Is it separate? Is anyone looking into that?
>
> They're currently separate branches of the usual -base, -good, and -bad
> GStreamer plugins. They will be merged in the near future, and will
> probably land in F
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 18:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
>
> "All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
> will be be encoded in WebM."
>
> So you all already heard the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
>
> "All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
> will be be encoded in WebM."
>
> So you all already heard the news
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:39:41 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> So you all already heard the news, Google has released web-m as a
> royalty free format under a BSD license style license. They have also
> have started using it in YouTube. So if we get things aligned, Fedora
> 14 would be ab
Hi,
http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
"All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
will be be encoded in WebM."
So you all already heard the news, Google has released web-m as a
royalty free format under a BSD lic
Compose started at Thu May 20 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
69 matches
Mail list logo
