I was under the impression that a timeout is intentional/used only if
another operating system is detected upon installation. ie. Windows. If no
other operating system is detected, then there's no point having a timeout.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 9
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 19:42 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:45 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> >>> current karma next to each push request? Or maybe Bodhi could be
> >>> configured to automatically cancel stable requests when the karma drops
> >>>
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 10:33 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> So what's the actual bug? I've read through the tracker list and I
> still can;t for the life of me detect an actual bug, but rather an
> annoyance for a select few. However, I do agree that there should be a
> delay increase for GRUB timeout.
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:45 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>>> current karma next to each push request? Or maybe Bodhi could be
>>> configured to automatically cancel stable requests when the karma drops
>>> below 0?
>>
>> I can look at doing this on the client side for pushes.
So what's the actual bug? I've read through the tracker list and I still
can;t for the life of me detect an actual bug, but rather an annoyance for a
select few. However, I do agree that there should be a delay increase for
GRUB timeout. More so like that of Debian, Ubuntu etc.
--
Chris Jones
Ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've got two package review requests that have been sitting around for a while
now. Anyone want to swap?
ez-gpg-pine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549004
clpbar:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560176
Small packages, just
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 15:31 -0400, goinea...@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I'm reaching my one year anniversary using fedora, so I guess it's
> time to stop lurking and start writing, so here goes.
>
>
> Back in November I added my two cents to the bugzilla report titled
> "Increase grub
Sometimes a BIOS firmware update solve these types of problems, a
update can be more ACPI-compatible. With the time, Linux kernel is
incorporating some BIOS tasks and fixing some bugs on some of these
BIOS.
Sometimes Linux or Fedora are innocents :)
Best regards.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:46
Hi
I'm reaching my one year anniversary using fedora, so I guess it's time to stop
lurking and start writing, so here goes.
Back in November I added my two cents to the bugzilla report titled "Increase
grub timeout". Today I got a notification the it has been set as WontFix. The
reason
- "Ralf Corsepius" wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 04:08 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on
> 2010-05-14.
>
>
> Comments on some packages I had a look into interspersed:
>
> > perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
> rebuilt
>
> > perl-AutoClass
> false ne
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 06:31:08PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry to bother with a stupid question.. but I couldn't find a tree that
> actually works.
> What's a working url to test F13 rc installer?
>
> I tried installing F13 Xen PV guests with virt-manager using the followin
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:58:04 -0700,
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 06:52 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > I'm up for the challenge previously having been told it wasn't
> > possible for release criteria and blocker bugs ;-)
> >
> >
>
> And we're still making judgment cal
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 06:52 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> I'm up for the challenge previously having been told it wasn't
> possible for release criteria and blocker bugs ;-)
>
>
And we're still making judgment calls there, because it is very very
difficult to codify.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedo
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 14:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 06:22 -0700 schrieb John Poelstra:
>
> > I'd like to see these "would take a fix for" bugs added or kept on the
> > blocker list with a short comment explaining why they are being taken in
> > since they
Hi,
Please review the patch for this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592307
Patch:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=414067&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=414067&action=diff
Thanks!
--
Endi S. Dewata
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lis
Hello,
Sorry to bother with a stupid question.. but I couldn't find a tree that
actually works.
What's a working url to test F13 rc installer?
I tried installing F13 Xen PV guests with virt-manager using the following urls:
- http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/13.RC3/Fedora/x8
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 06:22 -0700 schrieb John Poelstra:
> I'd like to see these "would take a fix for" bugs added or kept on the
> blocker list with a short comment explaining why they are being taken in
> since they don't meet the regular definition of "blocker bug".
Isn't this exact
This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on 2010-05-14.
-- Petr
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-AutoClass
perl-Business-ISBN-Data
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex
perl-Catalyst-View-JSON
perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits
per
Adam Williamson said the following on 05/13/2010 11:26 AM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
>>> the maintainers requesting the games.
>>
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma
>>> can
>>> be applied, then I'd be ok with
Compose started at Fri May 14 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:19 -0500, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is anyone else experiencing these issues?
>
> $ bodhi -n --type bug mysql-mmm-2.2.1-1.fc12 --username derks
> Creating a new update for mysql-mmm-2.2.1-1.fc12
> ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/save, 200, Err
On 14 May 2010 09:50, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:31 +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>> On 14 May 2010 06:42, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >>Really? I don't think there's *that* many cases where a negative piece
>> >>of
23 matches
Mail list logo
