On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:31 +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On 14 May 2010 06:42, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>Really? I don't think there's *that* many cases where a negative piece
> >>of karma is filed between the submission and the push
On 14 May 2010 06:42, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma
>>> can
>>> be applied, then I'd be ok with that. Unti
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma can
>> be applied, then I'd be ok with that. Until we require that, there are way
>> to
>> many cor
As many of you know, the FESCo and Board elections are right around the corner.
In each election cycle, a series of town hall meetings is conducted to
give the community an opportunity to ask the candidates questions -
and hear their answers - on IRC. The town halls for each election are
held twi
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma can
> be applied, then I'd be ok with that. Until we require that, there are way to
> many corner cases where something like that isn't going to work well.
Really? I d
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 14:45 -0500 schrieb Adam Miller:
> I think your safe with not redoing the review.
>
> -AdamM (from Android )
>
That's what I wanted to hear :D
I'll notice whether something is wrong when bodhi doesn't accept any new
updates at the latest.
Thanks for the help,
Jul
Hello all,
Is anyone else experiencing these issues?
$ bodhi -n --type bug mysql-mmm-2.2.1-1.fc12 --username derks
Creating a new update for mysql-mmm-2.2.1-1.fc12
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/save, 200, Error returned
from simplejson while processing https://admin.fedorap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pls upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592101
Summary: pls upgrade
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:31:32PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:45 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> >current karma next to each push request? Or maybe Bodhi could be
>> >configured to automatically cancel stable requests when the karma drops
>> >below 0?
>>
>> I can look at
I think your safe with not redoing the review.
-AdamM (from Android )
On May 13, 2010 1:52 PM, "Julian Aloofi"
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 13:25 -0500 schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> > Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the inst
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 13:25 -0500 schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> > Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the instructions
> > given there.
> > [...]
> I wouldn't think it would need a review, as it was *just* orphaned, and
> is a primar
Hello,
ccache's license has changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ in ccache 3.0pre1 which
will land in Rawhide soon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:45 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >current karma next to each push request? Or maybe Bodhi could be
> >configured to automatically cancel stable requests when the karma drops
> >below 0?
>
> I can look at doing this on the client side for pushes. That's a pretty good
> idea.
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
> > the maintainers requesting the games.
> >
>
> I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in
On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
> I have just taken ownership of the recently orphaned package
> 'diveintopython' in pkgdb as announced on this thread [1].
>
> Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the instructions
> given there.
>
> "If a package was last updated more t
I have just taken ownership of the recently orphaned package
'diveintopython' in pkgdb as announced on this thread [1].
Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the instructions
given there.
"If a package was last updated more than three months ago (running cvs
log -r HEAD *.spec can
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 15:18 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
>>
>> On Thu, 6 May 2010, Thomas Spura wrote:
>>
>>> My workaround for this was to kill the connection and yum will search
>>> then a new server and restart the connection.
>>>
>>> Maybe if
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:19:49PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:22 -0700, Jesse Keating escribió:
>
>> It's a little of both. once the update has been requested for stable,
>> the maintainer could rescind that request before releng does the push.
>> However there are
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 15:18 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
>
> On Thu, 6 May 2010, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> > My workaround for this was to kill the connection and yum will search
> > then a new server and restart the connection.
> >
> > Maybe if the rate is < 0.5 B/s -> restart the connection
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 19:39 +0530, Ankur Sinha escribió:
> It works normally here. No breakage at all
I figured out that something in my config file was making it crash:
http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/q3config.cfg
I had no time to bisect it against a pristine configuration file, so I'm
n
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:22 -0700, Jesse Keating escribió:
> It's a little of both. once the update has been requested for stable,
> the maintainer could rescind that request before releng does the push.
> However there are generally hundreds of updates across the releases that
> get pushed at
On 05/13/2010 12:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotn
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> we recently started a relati
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 12 May 2010 21:58, João Neto wrote:
>> The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
>
> This is a general point I'm making, not just about your email in particular.
>
> There appears to be a trend on this list where a random u
On 05/13/2010 06:24 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 18:17:51 +0200,
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 05:54 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500,
>>> Jon Ciesla wrote:
May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are go
>[1]diveintopython -- Dive into Python - a python book
If nobody else wants to take this, I'll take ownership of it.
Julian
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
>>> (jakarta-commons). There seems to be
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 18:17:51 +0200,
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 05:54 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500,
> > Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are good.
> >
> > The obsoletes don't appear to be good.
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 10:03 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:53 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
>
> > I gave a -1 to this update a few days ago, but it's been ignored:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13
> >
>
> Analyzing the eve
On 05/13/2010 05:54 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500,
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are good.
>
> The obsoletes don't appear to be good. I noticed that yesterday and filed
> a bug this morning.
Obsoletes where? Could yo
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
> > (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
> > trimming and revision numb
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39 -0500,
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> May as well, as long as the Obsoletes/Provides are good.
The obsoletes don't appear to be good. I noticed that yesterday and filed
a bug this morning.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
> (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
> trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
> point on wiki.
>
> So:
>
Hi,
we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
(jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
point on wiki.
So:
1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package?
2.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:06:39 -0500,
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I can prep for the test tonight, but it's a pain to do the final test
> > remotely. So that will wait until tomorrow.
> >
> Email me as soon as you want this done, and I'll do it ASAP.
Two people have confirmed that a combination
Oops! Last minute changes. My time just got shorter again, so I can
not take care of drpython now, however, I would not like to see it
being removed from Fedora.
2010/5/13 Chen Lei :
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields
> wrote:
>>
>> [3]gnome-themes-extras -- Collection of metath
Em 13-05-2010 05:35, Kamil Paral escreveu:
>> How do I increase size the boot partition, with LVM?
>> My partition:
>>
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda1 190M 39M 142M 22% /boot
>>
>> Can anyone help?
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Clóvis
>>
> I think
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> [3]gnome-themes-extras -- Collection of metathemes for the Gnome desktop
> environment
>
> [4]gnomecatalog -- Catalog Software for Gnome Desktop
>
> Take those two, comaintainers are welcome for all of my packages
https://admin.fed
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18870/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec
Log Message:
Don't clobber ~/.gnupg during build
Index: perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec
==
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18870/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec
Log Message:
Don't clobber ~/.gnupg during build
Index: perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
> fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
> perl-Apache2-SOAP
FWIW: this package fails due to a dependency on mod_perl.
When having rebuilt mod_perl, perl-Apache2-SOAP
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:57 -0400, Seth Vidal escribió:
> sudo yum install fedora-easy-karma
> fedora-easy-karma
>
> follow the prompts (if any)
Works fantastically, thanks!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
--
devel mailing list
I'm taking drpython
2010/5/11 Rich Mattes :
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields
> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> [6]mediatomb -- MediaTomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux
>
> I'll take this one. Co-maintainers welcome.
>
> Rich
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - End forwarded message -
>> --
>>
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 10:03 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:53 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
>
> > I gave a -1 to this update a few days ago, but it's been ignored:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13
> >
>
> Analyzing the eve
On 05/12/2010 11:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 16:22:13 -0500,
>Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> My understanding was that we would still open a rel-eng ticket for a
>> freeze exception. Which I didn't do for Wesnoth. Because the outcry
>> for it was underwhelming.
>>
El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:53 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
> I gave a -1 to this update a few days ago, but it's been ignored:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13
>
Analyzing the event log in Bodhi exposes where our quality process
ultimately fails: the upd
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 15:17 +0200 schrieb Karel Klic:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> there was a flaw in the duplicate detection (undiscovered for a long
> time) that allowed to file that duplicates you received.
>
> It has been fixed.
>
> abrt.spec:
> * Mon May 03 2010 Karel Klic 1.0.9-2
> - fi
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> What we really need, imho, is a better QC process between packagers and
> stable updates. Bodhi was supposed to implement such process, but in
> fact it's mostly useless because there's no incentive for testers to go
> there and report about their e
El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 15:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III escribió:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:23:38 +0530,
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/13/2010 02:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > I don't see that pulling in the games is a good idea. The release process
> > > is
> > > that only blockers
Dne 13.5.2010 14:55, Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
> AFAIK abrt recognizes dupes based on hashes of the backtrace, but the
> format of the backtraces has changed with nearly every new ABRT version,
> so the backtraces will not be the same even from exactly the same crash.
The hash is not calculated
Jesse Keating said the following on 05/12/2010 03:11 PM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
>>> the maintainers requesting the games.
>>>
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-SOAP-Lite/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18934
Modified Files:
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
Log Message:
* Thu May 13 2010 Ralf Corsépius - 0.710.10-4
- BR: perl(version) (Fix perl-5.12.0 build breakdown).
Index: per
Hi Christoph,
there was a flaw in the duplicate detection (undiscovered for a long
time) that allowed to file that duplicates you received.
It has been fixed.
abrt.spec:
* Mon May 03 2010 Karel Klic 1.0.9-2
- fixed crash function detection (a part of duplication detection)
Karel
Dne 13.5.201
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24164
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Tk.spec sources
Removed Files:
perl-Tk-XIM.patch perl-Tk-events.patch
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch perl-Tk-gif.patch
Log Mes
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tk:
8ec3e456ca0eadd685a574e943d3d9ce Tk-804.028_503.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
I'm getting the same bug reports over and over again, for example
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542393
Shouldn't ABRT catch the duplicates?
AFAIK abrt recognizes dupes based on hashes of the backtrace, but the
format of the backtraces has changed with nearly every new ABRT version,
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv27706
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu May 13 2010 Petr Pisar - 1.28-1
- Version bump
- Sort dependencies
I
Fedora 13 Final RC3 is now available [1], with changes from RC2 in
NetworkManager, anaconda, pino, and shotwell [2]. Please refer to the
following pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
htt
Compose started at Thu May 13 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
- "Clovis Tristao" wrote:
> How do I increase size the boot partition, with LVM?
> My partition:
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 190M 39M 142M 22% /boot
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Clóvis
>
I think the easiest way is
On 12 May 2010 21:58, João Neto wrote:
> The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
This is a general point I'm making, not just about your email in particular.
There appears to be a trend on this list where a random user just
posts an inflammatory email with "ACME SOFTWARE IS RUBBI
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 23:29:30 Chris Lumens wrote:
> > users do not need to find devel packages from the PackageKit GUI, we need
> > to search useful packages from here, that is my opinion...
>
> This line of thinking needs to stop. Developers are users, too, and
> development packages ending
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 23:24:13 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Guido Grazioli wrote:
> > 2010/5/12 Rahul Sundaram :
> >> The search box has a icon on the left side which defaults to searching
> >> the name rather than description. It is probably too subtle to notice.
> >> I bet that is
> ok. Thats 3 of us...
>
> Ionuț: Could you mail us any info about the current state of the package or
> any gotchas?
>
Thanks for picking this up, guys!
The latest issue was figuring out a way to unbundle the modified pychm
that calibre was shipping. That was in calibre 0.6.46. There's a 0.6.47
64 matches
Mail list logo
