On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 07:43 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 17:48:42 +0530,
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Could someone please tell me what the status of support for clutter on
> > nvidia cards in F13 is? Does nouveau support composting or whatever it
> > is needed for cl
On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:40:37 +0200
Martin Bacovsky wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 02:31:01 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
> >
> > "Ionuț C. Arțăriși" wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm
> > > orphaning it. I fell
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 16:22:13 -0500,
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> My understanding was that we would still open a rel-eng ticket for a
> freeze exception. Which I didn't do for Wesnoth. Because the outcry
> for it was underwhelming.
And likely another rebuild will be needed shortly. I still need
Original Message
Subject: Fedora 13 Final RC3 Available Now!
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:57:24 -0400
From: Andre Robatino
To: test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 13 Final RC3 is now available [1], with changes from RC2 in
NetworkManager, anaconda, pino, and shotwell [2]
Compose started at Wed May 12 19:32:05 UTC 2010
Updated Packages:
NetworkManager-0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13
-
* Mon May 10 2010 Dan Williams - 0.8.1-0.1.git20100510
- core: fix handling of IPv6 RA flags when router goes away (rh #588560)
- bluetooth:
A nice feature for all the add/remove software, is to be able to select all
packages in a group with one click rather than having to select each package.
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Seth Vidal
2010/5/12 Seth Vidal
> Seriously folks- try doing a 'yum search foo' before saying we cannot
> provide good search results.
>
I do not doubt that yum bring good results, but what you see as good
results?
For me and, I believe, the target audience of Fedora, "search for foo" would
need to bring
On Wed, 12 May 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
> I don't know if that's the issue, but this reminded me of this:
> http://www.secretgeek.net/ms_search.asp
>
> Implementing "search" is difficult. In a good implementation, the user
> shouldn't need to understand the schema of the underlying database
>
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
> > the maintainers requesting the games.
> >
>
> I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:44 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:38 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think we should have package kit use yum search
> > rather than yum list for the searching?
> >
> > I'll see if I can find out what's the story there.
>
> The search box has a
On 2010/5/12 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Guido Grazioli wrote:
>> Having an additional option in that context menu, which makes the search
>> mimic the "applications" search implemented in latest pkgdb, would be
>> a very nice feature indeed.
>
> yum can search an additional keywords d
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 18:19 -0300, João Neto wrote:
>
>
> 2010/5/12 Michael Cronenworth
> Here on an F12 box I typed in "Gtalk" into the GUI search box
> and it
> found the same results that Seth found for you.
>
> PackageKit is too technical software, it must be more ea
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:36:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:37:35 -0400,
> "Paul W. Frields" wrote:
> >
> > According to the release criteria[1], the decision was made to slip
> > the release of Fedora 13 by one week, to Tuesday 2010-05-25.
>
> Even though the
> Those packages *are* useful to people, just not the people you
have in mind.
the same way rawhide is useful for some people too but it is disabled by default
I guess the right way is to have a filter as a combo box applications,
docs or devel+sources
or at least some visual indication [ color
> users do not need to find devel packages from the PackageKit GUI, we need to
> search useful packages from here, that is my opinion...
This line of thinking needs to stop. Developers are users, too, and
development packages ending up in the search results is not such a bad
thing. Those package
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Guido Grazioli wrote:
2010/5/12 Rahul Sundaram :
The search box has a icon on the left side which defaults to searching
the name rather than description. It is probably too subtle to notice.
I bet that is the problem here.
Rahul
Having an additional option in that con
On 12/05/10 22:14, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:38 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we should have package kit use yum search
>> rather than yum list for the searching?
>>
>> I'll see if I can find out what's the story there.
>
> The search box has a icon on the left side w
On 05/12/2010 04:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
>> the maintainers requesting the games.
>>
>>
> I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the
2010/5/12 Michael Cronenworth
> Here on an F12 box I typed in "Gtalk" into the GUI search box and it
> found the same results that Seth found for you.
>
PackageKit is too technical software, it must be more easy to the Comum
user!
The relevant packages must be: OpenOffice, Koffice, KdeGames, Ki
2010/5/12 Rahul Sundaram :
> The search box has a icon on the left side which defaults to searching
> the name rather than description. It is probably too subtle to notice.
> I bet that is the problem here.
>
> Rahul
Having an additional option in that context menu, which makes the search
mimic t
On 12/05/10 21:58, João Neto wrote:
> The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
>
> When the user will get a package like this:
>
> Serch by: Latex Editor (None)
--snip--
If you click on the magnify glass icon
change to search by description.
Then you will find the other programs.
On 05/13/2010 02:38 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I think we should have package kit use yum search
> rather than yum list for the searching?
>
> I'll see if I can find out what's the story there.
The search box has a icon on the left side which defaults to searching
the name rather than descrip
2010/5/12 Seth Vidal
>
> I think we should have package kit use yum search
> rather than yum list for the searching?
The search result of PackageKit is not broken!
my article was to raise discussion on the ease of use in the search ...
When I search for "Twitter" I need relevant results, as Gwit
On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
> the maintainers requesting the games.
>
I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the
updates? If I knew what would be reasonable to request, it woul
João Neto wrote:
> The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
>
> When the user will get a package like this:
>
>
> Serch by: Gtalk
> - Nothing!
>
What are you using to search? The GUI Add/Remove Software app or
something else?
Here on an F12 box I typed in "Gtalk" into the GUI sea
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 11:14 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Jesse Keating said the following on 05/10/2010 04:08 PM Pacific Time:
> > Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state
> > where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release
> > candidate. This h
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> > We took pino, we did not take the games.
>
> I would like to hear some more thoughts on that.
There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
the maintainers requesting the games.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Wed, 12 May 2010, João Neto wrote:
The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
When the user will get a package like this:
Not sure what package kit is doing but just for fun try:
yum search Latex Editor | less
I get a number of replies.
the ones at the top are better.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:23:38 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I don't see that pulling in the games is a good idea. The release process is
> > that only blockers should be pulled in right now, though that is being
> > bent a little. There shou
The system package manager for Fedora to be smarter ...
When the user will get a package like this:
Serch by: Latex Editor (None)
Serch by: PHP IDE (Nothing)
Serch by: Twitter
- Devel packages
- Python packages
- No twitter CLIENTS appear in search!
Serch by: Gtalk
- Nothing!
Serch by: Msn
-
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 02:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> I don't see that pulling in the games is a good idea. The release process is
>> that only blockers should be pulled in right now, though that is being
>> bent a little. There should be some
On 05/13/2010 02:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I don't see that pulling in the games is a good idea. The release process is
> that only blockers should be pulled in right now, though that is being
> bent a little. There should be some clarification done in that regard for
> the next release, but
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 01:25:11 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> I would like to hear some more thoughts on that. IMO, either the game
> update should getting pulled in or people should just accept that the
> size of the games are large and updates are going to be big as well and
> focus on
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:25:09PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 12/05/10 15:19, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> --snip--
> >> (http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm
> >>
> >> and
> >> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-relea
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 15:41 -0300, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
> > On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
> >> this error:
> >>
> >> Not enou
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> How do I increase size the boot partition, with LVM?
> My partition:
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 190M 39M 142M 22% /boot
LVM won't help you with a physical partition like that. If the disk spac
On 05/13/2010 01:07 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 01:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Since a couple of people complained, have you considered taking in the
>> OpenArena and Wesnoth updates? How about the Pino update? I have a
>> ticket in trac for it.
>>
> We too
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 01:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Since a couple of people complained, have you considered taking in the
> OpenArena and Wesnoth updates? How about the Pino update? I have a
> ticket in trac for it.
We took pino, we did not take the games.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:22:22AM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/5/10 Patrice Dumas
>
> > For the applications I know some comments
> > * I am quite sure that gmanedit is not a manedit evolution. However,
> > manedit
> > is orphaned right now (though still not purged).
> > * xdialog is build twi
On 05/13/2010 12:36 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> These were high value issues that were either discussed at the various
> blocker meetings as "we'd take this if we slipped, but wouldn't slip
> because of it", or made such a decision today while looking at tickets
> filed in releng requesting the buil
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
> > On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
> >> this error:
> >>
> >> Not enough space in /boot/
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 11:14 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>
> I've noticed some discussion on #fedora-devel about "taking in
> nice-to-haves since the release is slipping." If these new packages are
> not blockers or critical to the release when/where did we decide to
> deviate from what is stat
Hi Frank,
Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
> On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
>> this error:
>>
>> Not enough space in /boot/upgrade to download install.img.
>>
> Read:
> http://li
Jesse Keating said the following on 05/10/2010 04:08 PM Pacific Time:
> Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state
> where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release
> candidate. This happened last Thursday, and almost immediately we found
> a need
On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
> this error:
>
> Not enough space in /boot/upgrade to download install.img.
Read:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/136148.html
then:
http://koji.f
Hi all,
I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
this error:
Not enough space in /boot/upgrade to download install.img.
My boot partition is 190MB and AFAIK that is not unusual so I tried
tidying up a bit, uninstalling all except unused kernels, and now have
about
Hi,
As you might have noticed, the marketing team has been doing a few
feature profiles covering various new features in Fedora 13, the last
ones remaining are one of Btrfs and SSSD
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs_in_Fedora_13
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SSSD_in_Fedora_13
So, take a qu
Hello,
I've computed dependency graph of failed packages (based on the 113-item list
sent by Marcela on Wednesday. See attached compressed SVG file.
The graph is layed out in such way that Required packages are below, arrow
shows what package depends on that package. Thus I recommend to start wit
On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:57:34 -0500
Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 5/12/2010 0:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > - After a week, if more than 3 (three) sponsors provide positive
> >feedback, the candidate is approved.
>
> This disagrees with the ticket. Is it supposed to be "three" or
> "more than t
On 5/12/2010 0:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> - After a week, if more than 3 (three) sponsors provide positive
>feedback, the candidate is approved.
This disagrees with the ticket. Is it supposed to be "three" or "more
than three?"
> - If the candidate has any negative or veto votes, then FESCo l
Greetings.
At today's fesco meeting we approved a change in the way we handle
provenpackager and sponsor nominations.
Old policy:
- Candidate files a ticket in the fesco trac instance.
- FESCo chair sends a email to sponsors for feedback.
- After a week FESCo looks at feedback and votes at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The F13 final readiness meeting, also known as the "go/no-go" meeting,
was held this evening. As the meeting notes indicate, there are bugs
remaining on the blocker list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-May/090880.html
According t
Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said:
> > And right now the values used are scaled to the hardware we have at
> > hand. So adjusting it wouldn't help Fedora one bit.
>
> Makes me wonder about your HW.
>
> Fact is, extending the limits to 200MB (the hard-coded limit is 100MB) I
> having no
On 05/12/2010 03:05 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I just happen to have spend 2 days recently getting such
> a card to work. With older versions of the realtek provided
> driver you will get bad reception with newer versions a kernel
> panic due to stack corruption. After spending too much time
> on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2010 08:28 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm helping to u
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 07:43 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 17:48:42 +0530,
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Could someone please tell me what the status of support for clutter on
> > nvidia cards in F13 is? Does nouveau support composting or whatever it
> > is needed for cl
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 08:27 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hey,
> >
> > I'm using pyclutter to develop an app. It worked perfectly on F12, on
> > nouveau. The same code is failing on F13 with segfaults. Any pointers to
> > debugging this? I do
Version 1.1.6
~~
Released: 2010-05-12
* Translations
- Added Finnish translation (vpv)
- Added Polish translation (raven)
- Added Russian translation (ypoyarko)
- Added Simplified Chinese translation (tiansworld)
- Updates to Spanish (Castilian) translation (beckerde)
* Bugfix:
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Smart-Comments/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2413
Modified Files:
perl-Smart-Comments.spec
Log Message:
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 1:1.0.4-2
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
Index: perl-Smart-Comm
On 12/05/10 15:19, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
--snip--
>> (http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm
>>
>> and
>> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm)
>>
>> and agreeing on the inserting new repository
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:18:54AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
> > replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
> >
> > You will hear answers along the line of too much inconveni
Hello All!
Well, not actually just for food. I would like to exchange requests -
someone could pick up each of these three easy-to-review
erlang-related applications, and I will finish your stalled review
request. One mine package for one yours - that's quite fair deal!
Here is the list of packag
Hi Jos,
On 05/10/2010 12:38 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kerne
On 05/11/2010 07:30 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
>> This probably means at least a rudimentary application testing rig
>> and a discipline that identifies and deals with distressed packages.
>
> Does the ongoing work with AutoQA provide the
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Unicode-Map/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13364
Modified Files:
perl-Unicode-Map.spec
Log Message:
sync with EL-5 (no EL-6 build done yet so OK to go 'backwards')
Index: perl-Unicode-Map.spec
==
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 17:48:42 +0530,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Could someone please tell me what the status of support for clutter on
> nvidia cards in F13 is? Does nouveau support composting or whatever it
> is needed for clutter?
If you install mesa-dri-drivers-experimental in F13, Nouveau w
Hello,
2010-04-08 21:06 keltezéssel, Daniel J Walsh írta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/08/2010 10:02 AM, Peter Czanik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm helping to upgrade syslog-ng to current version in major Linux
>> distributions. I would like to ask, if you could up
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hey,
>
> I'm using pyclutter to develop an app. It worked perfectly on F12, on
> nouveau. The same code is failing on F13 with segfaults. Any pointers to
> debugging this? I don't think it's a clutter issue since the program
> works on my colle
hey,
I'm using pyclutter to develop an app. It worked perfectly on F12, on
nouveau. The same code is failing on F13 with segfaults. Any pointers to
debugging this? I don't think it's a clutter issue since the program
works on my colleague's machine which features intel graphics.
Could someone pl
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-rpm-build-perl/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6318
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-rpm-build-perl.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 0.72-1
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 & update
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-rpm-build-perl:
71ad00f918352c2a26ac5a67778ea243 rpm-build-perl-0.72.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Wed May 12 08:15:06 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 17:19 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Why does the large size of some game files matter? _Number_ of
> updates matters (ie. 140 is a bit large) but on the other hand F13 has
> been in limbo for such a long time I'm not surprised.
It really hasn't. We accepted submissions
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 23:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The reason is that it is *game* and it is not part of the default set.
> Anyone who chooses to install it will get an updated game. I think the
> focus here is misguided. We should be paying attention to updates of the
> default package
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 05:47:48PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram
>
> > Hi
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
> >
> > Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> > issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 18:51:08 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
>
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Fedora is that better, sustainable way. It's not elitist, everyone is
> welcome to participate with the understanding that part of making that
> choice can involve the giving up some conveniences in the short term
> in the commitment to the la
77 matches
Mail list logo
