On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 00:28 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
> > 1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install gtk
> > myself then i'm good to go again. I would regret it if my favorite
> > distro drops t
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:23:33 +0200,
Léon Keijser wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 02:09 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because
> > they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase
> > and a maintainer willing to ta
On 05/11/2010 07:33 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 07:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:37:35 -0400,
"Paul W. Frields" wrote:
>
> According to the release criteria[1], the decision was made to slip
> the release of Fedora 13 by one week, to Tuesday 2010-05-25.
Even though the end result was a slip, I'd still want to thank the people
that worked hard ove
=
#fedora-meeting: F-13-Final readiness meeting
=
Meeting started by jlaska at 00:00:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-12/f-13-readiness.2010-05-12-
Chen Lei wrote:
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
>> On F-12/x86_64:
>> [snip]
>> swami-0:0.9.4-6.fc12.x86_64
>>
>> It seems to me that removing gtk+ won't be an easy task :(
>
> Most of those applications are replaced, e.g. xmms2 for xmms, putty(svn)
> for putty 0.60, since it's already done by some ot
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> This probably means at least a rudimentary application testing rig
> and a discipline that identifies and deals with distressed packages.
Does the ongoing work with AutoQA provide the solution you are looking for?
http://fedoraproject.o
On 05/11/2010 05:26 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> It seems a lot of trivial packages in fedora are unmaintained for a long
>
> I dispute your claim that there are "a lot."
>
> Yes we are going to have things fall through the cracks. But I've
> seen no
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> I use the non-responsive process or active nagging quite a lot, since I
> often stumble upon such packages (it already happend twice to youtube-dl
> that the current maintainer did not have enough time). Thankfully the
> start of the non-responsi
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:10:39AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
> > there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
> > my bookmarks and peek at it
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:26:53PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> How often does the AWOL maintainer process get used? Very rarely. If
> there were a lot of "unmaintained" packages I would expect to see the
> AWOL process be firing all the time as people reacted to missing
> maintainers.
I use the
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 02:31:01 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
>
> "Ionuț C. Arțăriși" wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
> > it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
> >
> > Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> It seems a lot of trivial packages in fedora are unmaintained for a long
I dispute your claim that there are "a lot."
Yes we are going to have things fall through the cracks. But I've seen
no analysis and no tools which would help us identify th
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
>> day before the go/no-go meeting?
>
> Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-05-11)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/fesco.2010-05-11-19.00.log.html
Meeting summary
-
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:47 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
>
>
> 2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram
> Hi
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has
> security
> issues
On 05/11/2010 02:10 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
>> there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
>> my bookmarks and peek at it every couple da
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
> there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
> my bookmarks and peek at it every couple days.
Indeed. I'd like to use my proven powers for good
On 05/12/2010 12:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
> there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
> my bookmarks and peek at it every couple days.
>
You might want to get in touch with the security team.
On 05/11/2010 01:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
>
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs& has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fed
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
> >> This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
> >> team whom can merely file bugs& has no power to ensure security flaws
> >> are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
> >>
> >>
> > Sure would be good to have vol
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:23:35PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> It again goes to the point of "why bother making releases at all", if
> they mean so little. And, trying to be less grumpy, maybe moving some
> packages to "rawhide only" style of repos. would make everyone happy (we
> could even call
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> >>>As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> >>> wesno
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:14 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
> >> day before the go/no-go meeting?
> >
> > Nope, not a
On 05/11/2010 10:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I think the point is that if the release was done in
> February, there's really no reason it should be a F-13
> *update* at GA.
>
The reason is that it is *game* and it is not part of the default set.
Anyone who chooses to install it will get an
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> , and we now have
>> deltarpms (and a huge thank to to all responsible there), so I really
>> don't think it's that big of an issue.
>
> As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltar
On 05/11/2010 09:35 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
>
>> And so what ?
>>
>> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
>> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
>>
> Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
>
Yep. The primary maintainer at that time recently
On 05/11/2010 07:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
On 05/11/2010 07:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
>> day before the go/no-go meeting?
>
> Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
> propose
Dne 10.5.2010 20:11, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a):
> And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
> mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
> the most popular matters.
PREACH IT!!! PREACH IT, BROTHER!!!
--
The American Republic will endure, until po
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:33:49 -0400, Bernie wrote:
> Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
>
> Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
>Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
>
> Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
W
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> >>>As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> >>> wesno
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
>> team whom can merely file bugs& has no power to ensure security flaws
>> are fixed in a timely manner is n
On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
>>>As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
>>> wesnoth-data due to it's size.
>> Then fix this deficiency of your proce
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
> team whom can merely file bugs & has no power to ensure security flaws
> are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
>
Sure would be good to have volu
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:27:30 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
> > They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
> > really should not be that big. (Compared to say the effect
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> > As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> > wesnoth-data due to it's size.
> Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
>
>
>
Patches welcome.
--
Xose Vazquez Perez (xose.vazq...@gmail.com) said:
> On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
> > On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> >> And so what ?
> >>
> >> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
> >> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
> >
> > Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time a
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
> day before the go/no-go meeting?
Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
propose blockers as easily as possible. Checking a flag is
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30344
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
- No perl(Test::YAML::Meta) in EPEL yet
- No aspell dic
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's unfortunate that these two big packages didn't make it into the
> base repo, but such is life. ;(
As this is the first time we've done the early branching... I
certainly expect mistakes right around the time of the branch freeze
and for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to
insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are
> > > filed against any package, and who have the privileg
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:23 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Within Fedora deltarpms have a limit of applying only to rpms less than
> 100MB, so there are no deltarpms. Anyone who wants to blame rel-eng for
> that is free to fix the delarpm code...
On that subject, anyone who wants to fix this would
On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:23:17 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
...snip...
> What say you?
I like it. It's not perfect, but I think it could make for a better
procedure. :) Lets give it a try for f14 if we can.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:19:41 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> >
> > Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make
> > anyone think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates
> > with a combined size
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> wesnoth-data due to it's size.
Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:00:47 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
> >I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone
> >will test it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
>
> Please stop sending this email. We have enough trouble g
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
>
>> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
>> I definitively missed that one.
>
> Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
> you would app
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
> I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you would appreciate co-maintainers?
For example, "soundconverter" has 8 open tic
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Antill wrote:
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
>
> ...the last being particularly
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
> > Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> > think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> > combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintai
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:30 +0200, H. Guémar wrote:
> > It is not part of a default package set.
>
> Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
> nothing but stupid.
It wasn't bugfixes, it was a new upstream release, and yes size does
matter. All mirrors, public and p
On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
>> And so what ?
>>
>> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
>> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
>
> Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
You said that, because you haven't seen really the oldest packag
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
>
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x8
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25938
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
Index: perl-Math-GMP.spec
=
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> ...
> [6]mediatomb -- MediaTomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux
>
I'll take this one. Co-maintainers welcome.
Rich
>
>
>
> - End forwarded message -
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.f
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> And so what ?
>
> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/05/10 16:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
>I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
>it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
Please stop sending this email. We have enough trouble getting people to test
our own OS. We don't need you using this l
On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> Author: pghmcfc
>>>
>>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>>
>>> Modified Fil
On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Author: pghmcfc
>>
>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> perl-Date-Simple.spec
>> Log Message:
>>
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
> mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
> the most popular matters. What I want is contributor targets to shoot
> for. I want a clear vision
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Event/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13694
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
Update 1.13.
Index: .cvsignore
===
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Nowadays the jack project has two branches - old jack (1) branch with
>>> version 0.116.2 and new one called jack2 version 1.9.3.
>>> I'd like to gather opinions and
I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
--
Lama boy ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file: /cv
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file: /
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
>> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
>> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
>> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 a
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
==
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/devel
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
> >
> > Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> > issues and breaks multiplayer in a coup
On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Author: pghmcfc
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>
> Modified Files:
> perl-Date-Simple.spec
> Log Message:
> Minor clean-ups
>
>
> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
=
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
===
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Index: perl-Diges
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Index: perl-Dig
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
> fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
> perl-FreezeThaw
... builds after having upgraded it (package is in rawhide, but not in
perl-f14-perltest, yet).
> perl-Gnom
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
==
Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
I don't remember building anything for F-12. The last F-12 build
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
> > >From whom it was gathered?
> > What was the question?
> > What was the answer?
> >
> > - Gilboa
> >
> >
>
> Most likely by reading or participating in the vario
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-Random/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4480
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-Random.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-Random.spec
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache2-SOAP
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView
perl-Catalyst-Authenti
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-DSA/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv777
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
===
RCS fi
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintainer not be respo
Hi Fedora paackager community,
Marc asked me to forward this to the list because of some mail account
issues. He's released ownership of the packages listed below.
Paul
- Forwarded message from Marc Wiriadisastra -
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:59:27 +0800
From: Marc Wiriadisastra
To: Paul
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:23 +0200,
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
> >
> > I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
> > that's a bit more reasonable.
>
> I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to solve here. I'm gussing
> it
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
> OpenArena. The maintainer has not resp
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hana
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
> They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
> really should not be that big. (Compared to say the effect an openoffice.org
> would have.)
... and wesnoth multiplayer doesn't work on
Compose started at Tue May 11 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintai
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
yeah, over 750 MB where 584 MB belongs to wesnoth and openarena. So without
these two games it's
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>>>
>>> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current versi
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
