Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 03:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> And even if the Fedora Thunderbird maintainer decides to push a >>> patched package to F-12, there's no way it should be pushed directly >>> to stable. >> >> Why not, if it contain

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 03:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > And even if the Fedora Thunderbird maintainer decides to push a > > patched package to F-12, there's no way it should be pushed directly > > to stable. > > Why not, if it contains an important fix? Because if we don't test the updated pa

Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100422 changes

2010-04-22 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:47 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:37:12PM +, Branched Report wrote: > > Compose started at Thu Apr 22 09:15:03 UTC 2010 > > > > Broken deps for i386 > > -- > > hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13

Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100422 changes

2010-04-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Hutterer wrote: > sigh. what happened here? My inbox suggests that the server was moved to > dist-f13 already but the F-13 Branched report doesn't seem to notice it. I guess it missed the cutoff, it should be in the next one. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Why isn't Mozilla releasing a new version that contains the fix? I don't know, but in the absence of a new release, the maintainer is supposed to backport the fix. 3-4 weeks or more is not a nice response time. > And even if the Fedora Thunderbird maintainer decides to pus

Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100422 changes

2010-04-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:37:12PM +, Branched Report wrote: > Compose started at Thu Apr 22 09:15:03 UTC 2010 > > Broken deps for i386 > -- > hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 > xorg-x11-drv-synapt

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Mail Lists
On 04/22/2010 08:30 PM, John Poelstra wrote: > An unofficial patched version would be better than the current situation. > > John FWIW - I use the nightly builds from mozilla.org .. no crashes at all with 3.1 nightly - be aware if you use enigmail, that versions after the 4/05 build do not wor

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread John Poelstra
Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 04/22/2010 01:27 PM Pacific Time: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Felix Schwarz > wrote: >> >> I'm concerned about bz 579023 [1] which is a Thunderbird crasher bug. >> This bug was fixed upstream [2] for about 3-4 weeks. I ran a thunderbird >> koji build ve

Re: Bootstrapping binaries

2010-04-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matt McCutchen wrote: > In such cases, we should seriously consider trying to repeat the entire > bootstrapping process purely from source code. In many of the problematic cases (where the compiler can only be bootstrapped with itself), this involves either going up an extremely long chain of ol

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: >  Run "echo 'n' | yum --skip-broken update" > > for me and save the output. It's really unexciting output. Output below: Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running tran

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:09 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > I started the "yum -y update" Well there's your problem. Only half kidding, but yum -y is quite dangerous, as it will happily do things like "yum -y remove glibc". That said, it shouldn't have removed things in order to process the update,

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I hope it's just me... >> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled >> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. > > I have two 64bit F13 laptops... fully updated with upd

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > I hope it's just me... > but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled > in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. I have two 64bit F13 laptops... fully updated with updates-testing except for gnome-icon-theme-extras whic

Bootstrapping binaries

2010-04-22 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 09:25 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > For example, stating "no binaries", wouldn't be true, as we might have a > situation where we would have a bootstrapped binary contributed along > with the source, but for bootstrapping reasons, needs to be included as > a starter. In

rpms/perl-Module-Signature/devel .cvsignore, 1.11, 1.12 perl-Module-Signature.spec, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.11, 1.12

2010-04-22 Thread Ville Skyttä
Author: scop Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13350 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Apr 23 2010 Ville Skyttä - 0.63-1 - Update to 0.63. - Sync with current rpmdevt

File Module-Signature-0.63.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by scop

2010-04-22 Thread Ville Skyttä
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Signature: 49a961502c0786797dabfea9c7fd30c3 Module-Signature-0.63.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Seth Vidal wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> I hope it's just me... >> but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled >> in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. It removed almost everything >> from /boot, and removed or emptied /sbin, /bin, /usr/sbin and

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > I'm concerned about bz 579023 [1] which is a Thunderbird crasher bug. > This bug was fixed upstream [2] for about 3-4 weeks. I ran a thunderbird > koji  build version [3] with an adapted version of that patch since then > without any proble

Re: F13/i686: yum update emptied /boot, /bin, /lib, etc.

2010-04-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote: > I hope it's just me... > but I was very dismayed to find that today's F13 update (which pulled > in a lot of changes) hosed my laptop. It removed almost everything > from /boot, and removed or emptied /sbin, /bin, /usr/sbin and /usr/bin. > It removed n

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
On 04/22/2010 02:39 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote: > I'm concerned about bz 579023 [1] which is a Thunderbird crasher bug. > This bug was fixed upstream [2] for about 3-4 weeks. I ran a thunderbird > koji build version [3] with an adapted version of that patch since then > without any problems. Other us

Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-22 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi, I'm concerned about bz 579023 [1] which is a Thunderbird crasher bug. This bug was fixed upstream [2] for about 3-4 weeks. I ran a thunderbird koji build version [3] with an adapted version of that patch since then without any problems. Other users confirmed that this patch fixes their pr

F-13 Branched report: 20100422 changes

2010-04-22 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Apr 22 09:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.2.2-3.fc13.i686 requires xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 0:1.8.0-6 Brok

Re: Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Guido Grazioli
2010/4/21 Deepak Bhole > Hi, > > I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are > core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and > would rather that someone more active take over: > > maven-scm -- Common API for doing SCM operations > wsdl4j -- Web Servi

Re: Request for Comments: Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Draft (Replacement for Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement)

2010-04-22 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 04/22/2010 01:45 AM, Sir Gallantmon (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn't English. > Note: IANAL Well, there is nothing in the FPCA that says we will accept or use your contribution, even if it is acceptably licensed. :) I'm not sure there is a lot of mer

Re: Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 04/22/2010 04:32 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > On 21 April 2010 17:17, Deepak Bhole wrote: >> I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are >> core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and >> would rather that someone more active take over: > > Sor

rawhide report: 20100422 changes

2010-04-22 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Apr 22 08:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1 paperbox-0.4.4-2.fc12.i686 requires libtrackerclient.so.0 rubygem-right_aws-

Re: Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
On 21 April 2010 17:17, Deepak Bhole wrote: > I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are > core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and > would rather that someone more active take over: Sorry to hear that you don't have time for these -- I'm willi

Re: [fedora-java] Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Mat Booth
On 21 April 2010 17:17, Deepak Bhole wrote: > Hi, > > I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are > core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and > would rather that someone more active take over: > > jakarta-commons-dbcp -- Jakarta Commons DataBase P

Re: [fedora-java] Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > @Alexander: no, I'm not a Fedora packager, but I did some really little > things. If you are not a Fedora packager you cannot get the ownership of orphaned packages. Read the following document on how to become a packager: https://fedoraproj

rpms/perl-Test-Prereq/devel perl-Test-Prereq.spec,1.12,1.13

2010-04-22 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Prereq/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13730 Modified Files: perl-Test-Prereq.spec Log Message: * Wed Apr 21 2010 Petr Pisar - 1.037-3 - Disable t/get_from_prereqs.t test because it requires interactive c

Re: [fedora-java] Orphaning of Java packages I own

2010-04-22 Thread Milos Jakubicek
On 21.4.2010 22:32, Deepak Bhole wrote: > * Mario Torre [2010-04-21 12:43]: >> >> I'm interested in those for the moment: junit, log4j, hsqldb, antlr >> >> I don't think I have time to grab the others, but once I learn the >> process I may be able to do it as well. >> > Hi Mario, I've grabbed ant