[Test-Announce] Bugzappers Meeting Agenda for 2010-04-20

2010-04-19 Thread Adam Williamson
Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting Date: 2010-04-20 Time: 15:00 UTC Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Additions or corrections to the agenda? Reply to this email. = Agenda = * follow ups * open floor Please do come out for the meeting - it'd be great to see more faces, and we don't bi

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread drago01
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Slava Zanko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's hard

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Frank Murphy
On 19/04/10 23:51, Slava Zanko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Bookma

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/4/20 Bernd Stramm : > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 02:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2010/4/20 Slava Zanko : >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > Hi folk, >> > >> > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... >> > >> > For example,

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Bernd Stramm
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 02:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/4/20 Slava Zanko : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi folk, > > > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > > > For example, all present utilites have sence just

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/4/20 Slava Zanko : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's h

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
> > i agree, also the proposed commands are too long to be typed in the terminal. > > they look like name-spaces in a programming language > > Best regards Maybe PASH is what you are searching: http://pash.sourceforge.net/ -- Athmane Madjoudj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Chris Tyler
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's h

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
> > I'm against making a mess of PATH with a crapload of symlinks. > If this were to happen, it should happen at a bashrc alias level, and even > then I'm still against it. > i agree, also the proposed commands are too long to be typed in the terminal. they look like name-spaces in a programming

Re: Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Ryan Rix
On Mon 19 April 2010 3:51:23 pm Slava Zanko wrote: > Hi folk, > > I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... > > For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, > fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing > (shell aliasin

Shell commands like to OS/2 shell (or MS PowerShell)

2010-04-19 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folk, I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites... For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm, fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing (shell aliasing) these and much

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-04-20)

2010-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation = New Business = #365 fesco list management questions = Fedora E

Re: rpms/gnome-desktop/F-13 gnome-desktop.spec, 1.241, 1.242 sources, 1.97, 1.98

2010-04-19 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 20:44 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > # Make sure to update libgnome schema when changing this > > -Requires: goddard-backgrounds-gnome > > -Requires: dmz-cursor-themes > > +Requires: constantine-backgrounds > > Why this change? Any specific reason or was it done by mis

rpms/perl-IO-Async/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-IO-Async.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-04-19 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Async/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13158/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-IO-Async.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.28 Index: .cvsignore =

rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-IO-Async.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-04-19 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13158/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-IO-Async.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.28 Index: .cvsignore ===

Request for Comments: Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Draft (Replacement for Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement)

2010-04-19 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
Hello Fedora! (Is this thing on?) Sorry for the very wide net, but we wanted to make sure as many members of our community could see this as possible. For some time now, Fedora has been working with Red Hat Legal to come up with a replacement for the Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreemen

Re: rpms/gnome-desktop/F-13 gnome-desktop.spec, 1.241, 1.242 sources, 1.97, 1.98

2010-04-19 Thread Martin Sourada
Hi, On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 00:24 +, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Author: mclasen > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gnome-desktop/F-13 > In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10490 > > Modified Files: > gnome-desktop.spec sources > Log Message: > 2.30.0 > # Make sure to update

F-13 Branched report: 20100419 changes

2010-04-19 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Apr 19 09:15:07 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc13.noarch requires zikula >= 0:1.2 Broken deps for x86_64

Re: summer coding and you

2010-04-19 Thread Karsten Wade
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:17:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I was just cursing the fact that libguestfs has several cracking > summer projects, but the GSoC deadline has passed, and now I see that > Fedora has this (which I'd never heard about before). Good news then! Grab us on #fed

rawhide report: 20100419 changes

2010-04-19 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Apr 19 08:15:11 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1 fwfstab-0.03-5.fc12.noarch requires kudzu paperbox-0.4.4-2.fc12.i686 require

2010-04-16 - F-13 Blocker Meeting Recap

2010-04-19 Thread James Laska
Greetings, Not quite the blocker marathon from F-12, but 4 1/2 hours is a long time to review blocker bugs. Thanks to all those who helped manage the list ahead of time, or during the meeting. Meeting minutes are attached and available for reference at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bug

Re: License change: swarp

2010-04-19 Thread Sergio Pascual
The license is CeCILL version 1. Upstream is looking into including the current license text in the next release. 2010/3/30 Seth Vidal : > > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Sergio Pascual wrote: > >> Hi all: >> >> the new version of swarp in rawhide (2.17.6) will have a CeCILL >> license. Previously, swarp

What is varnish? (Was: Please test varnish-2.1.0-2 for F-13)

2010-04-19 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
I was asked to give a short description of what varnish is. Varnish is a state of the art, high performance http accellerator. Think squid in reverse caching mode, but powered by the dark side of the force, on steroids*. Varnish is Free Software, available under the BSD license. Some highlights

Re: HAL status

2010-04-19 Thread Richard Hughes
On 18 April 2010 20:55, Ben Boeckel wrote: > The wiki states that pm-utils is hal-free. Maybe the hard dep in the RPM needs > looked at? Ajax discovered that it pokes HAL in at least two places. We're waiting for an upstream fix in the meantime. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedora