Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: > Are you sure, packages like gnuplot-py *have* to get rebuild? > Your first programm that causes troubles 'python-basemap' is not noarch. > A compiled programm needs a rebuild, but a programm with just python > files in it? Apologies, see the

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

Am Donnerstag, den 01.04.2010, 11:41 -0800 schrieb Jeff Spaleta: > Found this today with python-basemap. Numpy 1.4.0 introduced some ABI > changes. Anything that compiles against numpy and hasn't been rebuilt > since Numpy 1.40 was introduced in late January may need to be rebuilt > in F-13 and ra

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 11 is now owned by eseyman To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 12 is now owned by eseyman To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 13 is now owned by eseyman To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora devel is now owned by eseyman To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > It was sorted! By build date!  Oldest builds at the top.  I'm working > on narrowing the list to just things that buildrequire...I'll > alpanumeric sort that one. Here is a revised list, sorted for package name, of packages that probably need

[Bug 567120] perl-Set-Scalar: please update to v1.25 and create EPEL branches

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 569298] Branch perl-Hash-WithDefaults for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 569298] Branch perl-Hash-WithDefaults for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 569299] Branch perl-PerlIO-gzip for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 567120] perl-Set-Scalar: please update to v1.25 and create EPEL branches

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:05:50 EDT --- perl-Set-Scalar-1.25-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora

[Bug 569298] Branch perl-Hash-WithDefaults for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569298 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:03:01 EDT --- perl-Hash-WithDefaults-0.04-7.el4 has been pushed to the F

[Bug 569298] Branch perl-Hash-WithDefaults for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569298 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:06:08 EDT --- perl-Hash-WithDefaults-0.04-7.el5 has been pushed to the F

[Bug 569299] Branch perl-PerlIO-gzip for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569299 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:03:34 EDT --- perl-PerlIO-gzip-0.18-7.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedor

[Bug 569299] Branch perl-PerlIO-gzip for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569299 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:05:37 EDT --- perl-PerlIO-gzip-0.18-7.el4.1 has been pushed to the Fedor

[Bug 569299] Branch perl-PerlIO-gzip for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:00:27 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fed

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:02:25 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fe

[Bug 569295] Branch perl-Hash-Case for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 569295] Branch perl-Hash-Case for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569295 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:00:41 EDT --- perl-Hash-Case-1.006-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora E

[Bug 569295] Branch perl-Hash-Case for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 569295] Branch perl-Hash-Case for EPEL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569295 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-01 17:00:52 EDT --- perl-Hash-Case-1.006-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora E

Re: openal-soft .pc file compiling is broken i need help please

On 4/1/10 2:17 PM, LinuxDonald wrote: > I found today that the .pc file compiling is broken in openal-soft. > > When i compile openal-soft i become this .pc file: > > prefix=/usr > exec_prefix=${prefix} > libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib64 > includedir=${prefix}/include > > Name: OpenAL > Descript

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:41 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> Here are the  packages that might be affected according to repoquery >> run on my 32bit box with build timestamps prior to numpy 1.4.0. >    <> > > Please sort the list.  Yes, many mail user agents do offer text Search, > but mostly that works

Re: openal-soft .pc file compiling is broken i need help please

LinuxDonald wrote: > I found today that the .pc file compiling is broken in openal-soft. > > When i compile openal-soft i become this .pc file: > > prefix=/usr > exec_prefix=${prefix} > libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib64 > includedir=${prefix}/include > > Name: OpenAL > Description: OpenAL is a c

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

> Here are the packages that might be affected according to repoquery > run on my 32bit box with build timestamps prior to numpy 1.4.0. <> Please sort the list. Yes, many mail user agents do offer text Search, but mostly that works well only for known literal substrings. If you want effecti

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Here are the  packages that might be affected according to repoquery > run on my 32bit box with build timestamps prior to numpy 1.4.0. Let me stress the "might" That was a first rough cut at a list. Its really anything that buildrequires num

Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

Found this today with python-basemap. Numpy 1.4.0 introduced some ABI changes. Anything that compiles against numpy and hasn't been rebuilt since Numpy 1.40 was introduced in late January may need to be rebuilt in F-13 and rawhide. Just a friendly heads up. I'm fixing python-basemap now and then

Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

Nathan Kinder wrote: > On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: >> On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: >> >>> - "Nathan Kinder" wrote: >>> >>> >>> >> The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the >> DS instance names. A recent format ch

[389-devel] Please Review: (570912) SELinux denials with 1.2.6.a2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570912 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404068&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404068&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404069&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=40406

Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

On 04/01/2010 11:18 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: - "Nathan Kinder" wrote: The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the DS instance names. A recent format change to start-s

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Our QA Enforcers will evaluate your email and let you know soon. If you > live, that means it was good enough. ;) OK I'll be looking over my shoulder until the official word that I'm in the clear! -- mike c -- devel mailing list devel@l

[Fedora-r-devel-list] Monthly update

As proposed there is the monthly reminder about the version of the packages in Fedora vs upstream. I did not clean the known false positive so far. spot -- R-nwsis outdated, 2.0.0.3 vs 1.7.0.0 upstream denisarnaud -- R-msm is outdated, 0.9.5 vs 0.9.6 upstream orion -- R-car

Re: [389-devel] Please Review: Fix parsing of start-slapd scripts

On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: - "Nathan Kinder" wrote: The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the DS instance names. A recent format change to start-slapd caused this parsing to break.

openal-soft .pc file compiling is broken i need help please

I found today that the .pc file compiling is broken in openal-soft. When i compile openal-soft i become this .pc file: prefix=/usr exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib64 includedir=${prefix}/include Name: OpenAL Description: OpenAL is a cross-platform 3D audio API Requires: Vers

Re: F-13 Branched report: 20100401 changes

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 16:47 +, Branched Report wrote: > > > New package packETH > A GUI packet generator tool > New package perl-Devel-Caller-IgnoreNamespaces > Make available a function which can ignore name-spaces that > you tell it about > New package perl-Number-Bytes-Huma

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 18:24 +0100, mike cloaked wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Here's a quick recap of last week's Printing Test > > Day: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-03-25_Printing > > > > The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:24 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Here's a quick recap of last week's Printing Test >> Day: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-03-25_Printing >> >> The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had resu

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Here's a quick recap of last week's Printing Test > Day: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-03-25_Printing > > The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had results from about a > half dozen testers. If anyone has a partic

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Just a reminder that today is 1st April. > indeed - and Google has a lovely one too at http://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/landing/translateforanimals/ -- mike c -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

Here's a quick recap of last week's Printing Test Day: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-03-25_Printing The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had results from about a half dozen testers. If anyone has a particular reason they didn't attend, we'd love to hear about it. We'd hav

F-13 Branched report: 20100401 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 1 09:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.2.1 hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 libnodeupdown-backen

Re: Fedora 13 Beta Slip 1 week

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards > stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At > the moment there has been no pushes to testing and not having this for > another week massively e

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello! > > I just found that some folks submitted some interesting packages for the > review. Not all of them are in good shape, though. > > * wow-oss (Fedora Games SIG members, please take care of it) > * iTunes (nice, Qt-based alternative t

Re: bug no: 552456 E620 not detected - 2nd Request

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:53 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:27:38AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:18 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am trying to get my k3715 to work in F12 or F13. I have filled this > > > bug re

rawhide report: 20100401 changes

Compose started at Thu Apr 1 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Banshee.Core) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Hyena) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On 1 April 2010 18:33, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/01/2010 06:31 PM, Debayan Banerjee wrote: >> On 1 April 2010 18:28, Debarshi Ray wrote: >> >>> Just a reminder that today is 1st April. >>> >> That should wake Rahul up :) >> > > You missed the point completely. ok. -- Debayan Banerjee Sof

Re: [389-devel] Re-engaging the Samba4 LDAP backend

Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: > We're considering this proposal for FDS: > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/RDN_Value > At this point it's still being designed, so I can't say yet when this > would become available. I wonder how that's supposed to work for multi-valued RDNs (which are not needed

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On 04/01/2010 06:31 PM, Debayan Banerjee wrote: > On 1 April 2010 18:28, Debarshi Ray wrote: > >> Just a reminder that today is 1st April. >> > That should wake Rahul up :) > You missed the point completely. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On 1 April 2010 18:28, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Just a reminder that today is 1st April. That should wake Rahul up :) -- Debayan Banerjee Software Engineer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

Just a reminder that today is 1st April. Regards, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On 1 April 2010 18:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Couple of them are clear trademark violations and have to be renamed. :D -- Debayan Banerjee Software Engineer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

On 04/01/2010 04:46 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello! > > I just found that some folks submitted some interesting packages for > the review. Not all of them are in good shape, though. > > * wow-oss (Fedora Games SIG members, > please take care of it) > * iTunes

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

On 03/10/2010 05:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> There is no strong dependency between "man" and "man-pages". >> >> "man" is just one utility amongst many utilities which can be used to >> process man-pages. >> > Perhaps it would

Re: URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

2010/4/1 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello! > > I just found that some folks submitted some interesting packages for the > review. Not all of them are in good shape, though. > > * wow-oss (Fedora Games SIG members, please take care of it) > * iTunes (nice, Qt-based alternative to xmms) > * mscc-visualcpp (f

URGENT! These review requests needs your attention!

Hello! I just found that some folks submitted some interesting packages for the review. Not all of them are in good shape, though. * wow-oss (Fedora Games SIG members, please take care of it) * iTunes (nice, Qt-based alternative to

Re: Fedora 13 Beta Slip 1 week

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards >> stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At >> the moment there has been no pushes

Re: CVS Permissions

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:25:29AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > who do I ask, to get the permission to set the fedora-cvs-flag in > bugzilla? I would like to import my recently approved package into cvs. > Or did I understood the procedure > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#New_

Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines

* A dozen packages fixed since February. * 23 packages left to be fixed. * To the remaining tickets I've added comments about whether anything in the package collection links static with a library. I've experimented with tools that examine koji build.log output in addition to verifying the

Re: Fedora 13 Beta Slip 1 week

On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards > stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At > the moment there has been no pushes to testing and not having this for > another week massively

Re: bug no: 552456 E620 not detected - 2nd Request

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:27:38AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:18 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am trying to get my k3715 to work in F12 or F13. I have filled this > > bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552456 . It > > report

Re: Fedora 13 Beta Slip 1 week

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > Despite a heroic effort by developers and testers, we have not been able > to reach Beta release criteria by the time of the Go / No Go meeting. > There are still unresolved bugs and unknown test results.  Because of > this we've enacted a 1 w

Re: CVS Permissions

Matthias Runge wrote: > Hi, > > who do I ask, to get the permission to set the fedora-cvs-flag in > bugzilla? I would like to import my recently approved package into cvs. > Or did I understood the procedure > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#New_Packages wrong? > (First wait for

CVS Permissions

Hi, who do I ask, to get the permission to set the fedora-cvs-flag in bugzilla? I would like to import my recently approved package into cvs. Or did I understood the procedure https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#New_Packages wrong? (First wait for permission, then request a CVS modul