[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta TC#1 Available Now!

Hi all, F13 Beta TC1 has been uploaded, please follow the guidance in the below links: Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Many thanks, Hurry Forwarded Messa

Re: usb_modeswitch by default

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Just to clarify, does ModemManager need to depend on usb_modeswitch? > It currently does not. Dan, I guess its not such a bad idea to make it depend? > Rahul - -- Regards, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas

bug no: 552456 E620 not detected - 2nd Request

Hi all, I am trying to get my k3715 to work in F12 or F13. I have filled this bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552456 . It reports by dmesg as a E620. The modem works fine in F11 with no usb_modeswitch. But by default the CD Rom and Memory card a re disabled by default. In

load a program automaticly as root(xinitrc-common not work any more)

Hi I used to use xinitrc-common to load my program as root automaticly,but this mothod stop working since FC11.What can I do if I still need to load my program as root (in system scripts)? Any kind of help will be appreciated because I can't manage to find any Docs about this change at all. Roy

Re: Evolution trash folder

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 12:01 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 20:53 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > No checkmarks checked or unchecked that I could find. The only other > > explanation is if I did a clean setup (no backups) and see what that > > does. I might do that with a clean/n

Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal

On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 07:14 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Terry Barnaby wrote: > > Although I understand Fedora's frontier status, I think the graphics > > system changes could probably have been handled better. After the kernel > > and core shared libraries the graphics system is probably the next

Re: usb_modeswitch by default

On 03/23/2010 02:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > > If the device is supported by NM/ModemManager post-modeswitch (which > most are) then yes, the experience should be out-of-the-box Just Works. > The #1 reason it doesn't Just Work is modeswitching, which until now was > not automatic for many devices.

Re: usb_modeswitch by default

On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 00:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 03/19/2010 04:26 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > > > Just to be sure: do this mean users with those dongles should have a > > "works out of the box" experience with NetworkManager in F13? > > > > > I don't know that. I believe it requi

Plan for tomorrow's (2010-03-23) FESCo meeting (note meeting time change)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: The Meeting Time has CHANGED. See above. = Followups = #351 Create a policy for updates = New Business = #357 New Sponsor Request: Matthew

Re: rpm not finding python dependency

On 03/22/2010 04:33 PM, Léon Keijser wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to create a package [1], and run into a slight problem when > running rpmlint on the resulting rpm: > > $ rpmlint -i googsystray-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch.rpm > googsystray.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib > You must let rp

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> then you can diff the two more easily. > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't have all the nightlies > there is not much to compare. All I can compare is the F12 spin with the > latest nightly and this wont tell me much about what happe

rpm not finding python dependency

Hi, I'm trying to create a package [1], and run into a slight problem when running rpmlint on the resulting rpm: $ rpmlint -i googsystray-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch.rpm googsystray.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneed

Re: Fedora has become fat!

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:09:27 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > > > > rpm -qa --qf "%{name}\n" | sort > rpm-out > > > > > > > > > > then you can diff the two more easily. > > > > > > > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't hav

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:09:27 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > > rpm -qa --qf "%{name}\n" | sort > rpm-out > > > > > > > > then you can diff the two more easily. > > > > > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't have all the nightlies > > > there is not much to compare. All I can compare is th

Re: Fedora has become fat!

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 14:49 -0500 schrieb Mike McGrath: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wro

Re: Python 2.6.5 and 3.1.2 likely to be released at the end of the week

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 15:32 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:22:48PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 02:51 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:45:27PM -040

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote > > > > >> Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further in

libgpod rebuilds needed in F-13/devel

Heya, libgpod has been rebuilt with a new libimobiledevice (1.0.0) and all the applications that link against libgpod will need a rebuilt. Rhythmbox is being rebuilt as we speak, I'll let others to their respective owners. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: Fedora has become fat!

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote > > >> Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further investigate > >> this? > > > > I've found with Moblin and Sug

Re: Automatic Provides and Requires for Python modules

In general, +1 to this. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hi people, > > At the top of our Python packaging page > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python), there's a note which > reads 'In theory /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh would also automatically >

F-13 Branched report: 20100322 changes

Compose started at Mon Mar 22 09:15:08 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 pyclutter-gst-0.9.2-1.fc12.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 zikula-module-menu

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Karsten Hopp?

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Karsten Hopp wrote: > Am 22.03.2010 12:05, schrieb Till Maas: >> Hiyas, >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:45:25PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: >> >> >  The privoxy current in F12 is a beta version and had a lot of bugs. >> >  See >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Karsten Hopp?

Am 22.03.2010 12:05, schrieb Till Maas: > Hiyas, > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:45:25PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: > > > The privoxy current in F12 is a beta version and had a lot of bugs. > > See > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=privoxy&product=Fedora > > > > Can anyone tell K

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert >> wrote: >>> >>> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? >>> >>>      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1

Re: F13 install timings

On 03/19/2010 03:41 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> It's an http install to a local server, and there is no access during >> that stage (after is has all of the repodata files) until it starts >> fetching package headers. So, it seems like filing a bug is in order. >> Anaconda or yum? > > Anaconda, the

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema/devel auto.ini, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema.spec, 1.7, 1.8

Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13775 Modified Files: auto.ini perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema.spec Log Message: * Mon Mar 22 2010 Chris Weyl 0.40-2 - manually provide Catalyst::Model::

Re: Live image from filesystem snapshot?

I think this is a good idea because many of our users don't have access to any repositories I thought about rpmrebuild then creating a repo ... Name : rpmrebuild Description: A tool to build an RPM file from a package that has already been : installed. but that would be a big w

Live image from filesystem snapshot?

Not sure where to send this request, but since it was inspired by the Fedora has become fat! discussion, this seems like an appropriate place. I have a nicely tweaked installation of the LXDE spin sitting on my hard drive that I would like to snapshot and place on a live USB stick (ideally with per

Re: Akonadi's unix sockets location

On Sun, 21.03.10 14:44, Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underw...@gmail.com) wrote: > > It's a shared namespace. As such it is a major source of > > vulnerabitilities, especially if the developers didn't have this > > particular use in mind. > > To what extent would the security issues associated wi

rawhide report: 20100322 changes

Compose started at Mon Mar 22 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- edje-0.9.93.063-1.fc14.i686 requires libembryo-ver-svn-05.so.0 emotion-0.1.0.042-5.fc12.i686 requires libecore_job.so.0 emotion-0.1.0.042-5.fc12.i

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema

perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.40-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema::Types) On i386: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.40-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(Catalyst::Mode

Upcoming Fedora 13 Tasks

Start End Name Tue 09-Mar Tue 23-Mar Alpha Testing Tue 16-Mar Tue 23-Mar Software: Rebuild all translated packages Thu 18-Mar Wed 24-Mar Test Beta 'Test Compose' Tue 23-Mar Tue 23-Mar End of Alpha Testing Tue 23-Mar Tue 23-Mar Feature Complete--100% Wed 24-Mar Wed 24-Mar D

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 01:50 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > > * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a > single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was > replaced with LXDM,

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: >> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? >> >>      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >>        single change in the Spin. There actua

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was >        replaced with LXDM, but L

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change,

Re: Akonadi's unix sockets location

On 03/21/2010 10:44 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 19 March 2010 23:52, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> That is a security hole. Since /tmp knows no further access control an >> evil user can just create dirs there for each and every single user on >> the system. Those directories will then

2010-03-19 - F-13 Beta Blocker Meeting Recap

Greetings, The second scheduled [1] Fedora 13 Beta blocker bug review [2] was held last Friday. The F13Beta blocker list [3] was reviewed and each bug was evaluated against the beta release criteria [4]. Thanks to all who helped move the meeting along. A meeting recap is attached and available

Non-responsive maintainer Karsten Hopp? (was: Re: Privoxy have a lot openbugs in F12)

Hiyas, On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:45:25PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: > The privoxy current in F12 is a beta version and had a lot of bugs. > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=privoxy&product=Fedora > > Can anyone tell Karsten to fix those bugs? I did not check any further, but

Re: Evolution trash folder

On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 20:53 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > No checkmarks checked or unchecked that I could find. The only other > explanation is if I did a clean setup (no backups) and see what that > does. I might do that with a clean/new test user and see what > happens. Hi, try to run

Re: Privoxy have a lot openbugs in F12

Am 22.03.2010 09:45, schrieb Chen Lei: Hi all, The privoxy current in F12 is a beta version and had a lot of bugs. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=privoxy&product=Fedora Can anyone tell Karsten to

Re: Fedora has become fat!

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was >        replaced with LXDM, but

Re: Fedora has become fat!

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:43 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede: > Hi, > > Maybe somehow fluid-soundfont-gm or fluid-soundfont-lite-patches is getting > dragged in ? Nope, according to the logs [1+2] they are not in there. Also it's a steady growth instead of some big changes. Regards, Christoph

Privoxy have a lot openbugs in F12

Hi all, The privoxy current in F12 is a beta version and had a lot of bugs. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=privoxy&product=Fedora Can anyone tell Karsten to fix those bugs? Regard. Chen Lei-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: Fedora has become fat!

Hi, Maybe somehow fluid-soundfont-gm or fluid-soundfont-lite-patches is getting dragged in ? Those are quite big. Regards, Hans On 03/22/2010 01:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >* The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509