Forwarded Message
From: Zarko Pintar
To: fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com
Subject: I'm leaving packaging on Fedora
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:57:05 +0100
Because of my obligations I must leave packaging on Fedora.
Please, if someone want to take my packages for f
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:03 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann writes:
>
> > Well. Even pretty fundamental GNOME stuff like gtk2-devel is still
> > broken. Look here:
> >
> > [r...@localhost ~]# pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
> > -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527848
Subject: make sure db upgrade to 4.7 and later works correctly
Proposed Fix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=395003&action=diff
Change Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=395003&action=edit
Thanks,
--noriko
When: Friday, 2010-02-19 @ 16:00 UTC (11 AM EST)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again: blocker bug review meeting time! Tomorrow is the
third blocker bug review meeting for Fedora 13 Alpha.
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release. We'll be
disc
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my
> >updates". In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
> >shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click o
On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my
updates". In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen
for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems
2010/2/18 Jonathan Underwood :
> Hi,
>
> I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my
> updates". In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
> shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen
> for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems to have g
Hi,
I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my
updates". In the list I see a recent package I pushed to testing -
shorewall-4.4.6-2.fc12. When I click on it, it takes me to a screen
for luckybackup-0.3.5-2.fc12. Something seems to have gone awry with
the hash generation or linki
On 12/31/2009 04:31 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 12/30/2009 02:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> It would be nice if others could join in (be it virtual not necessarily
>> physically). So are there any takers for this ?
>
> It might be useful to have a wiki page listing out the specific content
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:22 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> If the ticket is assigned to a single person, I doubt we can do the
> overwrites in a timely manner. Remember, I'm wasn't talking about a
> single overwrite but about large build chains that require 8 or 9 rounds
> of builds and up to 15
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 07:36 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> We typically assign the ticket to ourself, whoever is doing
> the tag, so that when the reporter says the build is done we see it and
> can do the untag and close the ticket.
If the ticket is assigned to a single person, I doubt
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In the file ("hostfiles") that tells us what to copy in from the host
> system we do use wildcards. But we only wildcard the minor and
> release numbers, not the soname major number, since an soname bump
> probably implies some sort of major change which requires human
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:51:28PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In the file ("hostfiles") that tells us what to copy in from the host
> system we do use wildcards. But we only wildcard the minor and
> release numbers, not the soname major number, since an soname bump
> probably implies some
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:58:05PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It really does require those exact files. It's not linking, it's
> > composing an appliance on the fly using files taken from the host:
> >
> > http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/supermin-appliance-now
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> All these rpms are still linked to db4-4.7 instead of db4-4.8. They just
> don't appear as broken dependencies because of the existence of
> compat-db47.
Do we really need that compat package in the first place?
IMHO we should only ship compat packages when it can't be av
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:43 +0100, Tomo Vuckovic wrote:
> Tags for "dist-f14-build" heave bad arches : i386.
> All package build for this tags heave bad arch i386 not i686.
>
> Regards,
> Tomo
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It really does require those exact files. It's not linking, it's
> composing an appliance on the fly using files taken from the host:
>
> http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/supermin-appliance-now-in-febootstrap/
Why don't you just have it use wildcards to select the
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 10:20 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:07:52AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > libguestfs is using its own find-requires script, which is what appears
> > to be generating those. From a quick look it's not clear whether it
> > really needs exactly
Tags for "dist-f14-build" heave bad arches : i386.
All package build for this tags heave bad arch i386 not i686.
Regards,
Tomo
<>--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:59 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> I volunteer to help with buildroot overrides assuming that it does not
> take that much time. I am located in CET/UTC+1, too. Is there maybe a
> schedule about how well the timeslots are covered?
Great!
We don't really have a coverage list, b
All these rpms are still linked to db4-4.7 instead of db4-4.8. They just
don't appear as broken dependencies because of the existence of
compat-db47. It'd be somewhat unstable to let those out without
rebuilding for F-13 given that some of these may link to something else
that also happens to link
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:44:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> You're in Austria right? Rex wakes up before I do, which is why he's
> hitting them before me. Finding somebody on the other side of the pond
> who's interested in doing releng work would help.
I volunteer to help with buildroot o
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:07:52AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 16:17 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) said:
> > > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 20:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:06:16PM +, Rawhide Repor
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 04:30:31AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> If every grouped update did that, Koji would be littered with special tags.
> * problems with merging from the special tags (what if dist-f12-kde440 and
> dist-f12-someotherlib123 both carry their own rebuilds of, say, compiz? It
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
