On Wednesday 20 January 2010 06:27:18 pm Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:31:45PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> > > I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
> > > get one, because I'm not a kernel developer
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 16:29 -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> From https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel, it
> looks like kernel actually has provenpackager commits on, so this should
> be normal. I thought it was one of the exceptions, but apparently not.
Did we grant _any_ exce
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:16:07PM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> I just installed a new machine with Fedora 12 this evening, and Anaconda
> gave an error about not being able to get the repository metadata. I
> ended up switching the URL from the default mirrorlist to a specific
> mirror, and the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:31:45PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
> > get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
> > ordinary provenpackager without any additio
On 15/01/10 01:00 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
> are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
> else (over 8800) managed to build for Fed
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
> get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
> ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
> to the kernel package.
>
>
Kernel is open to provenpackager, s
On 2010-01-20 10:20:33 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> base on a post in the last year on fedora-devel I have
> make the following test the the kernel package repository:
>
> $ git clone ssh://s450...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/kernel
> $ cd kernel
>
> ... Add a Changelog entry in kernel.spec
>
> $g
> "JS" == Jochen Schmitt writes:
JS> I'm only a ordinary provenpackager without any additional access to
JS> the kernel package.
Provenpackagers have write access to the kernel package. What exactly
do you think has gone wrong here?
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
base on a post in the last year on fedora-devel I have
make the following test the the kernel package repository:
$ git clone ssh://s450...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/kernel
$ cd kernel
... Add a Changelog entry in kernel.spec
$git commit -m
Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
> I meant to add that the reason this came up was I was trying to work out
> where to put yum-langpacks in comps: yum-presto being one of the reference
> packages I searched for.
>
> So where can/should yum-langpacks live?
Probably in base. Now whether i
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said:
> +1
>
> In fact, we voted in FESCo that it should be added to one of the base groups
> instead (@base, I guess). It makes no sense to have it in @gnome-desktop nor
> in the KDE .ks file (which is where it is at the moment – for KDE, it's in
> the .k
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 21:10 -0600 schrieb Mike McGrath:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> >
> > - "Andrew McNabb" wrote:
> >
> > > I just installed a new machine with Fedora 12 this evening, and
> > > Anaconda
> > > gave an error about not being able to get the repo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:23:23AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/20/2010 08:16 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > After posting my initial blog post
> > (http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/fedora-virtualization-has-rough-e
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:10:01PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> >
> > - "Andrew McNabb" wrote:
> >
> > > I just installed a new machine with Fedora 12 this evening, and
> > > Anaconda
> > > gave an error about not being able to get the repos
Thank you for your suggestion.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2010 08:16 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> After posting my initial blog post
> (http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/fedora-virtualization-has-rough-edges/)
> and through discussion in comments and also in reported bugs I saw the
After posting my initial blog post
(http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/fedora-virtualization-has-rough-edges/)
and through discussion in comments and also in reported bugs I saw the
great potential of virt-manager on Fedora as desktop virtualization
tool that could replace likes o
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 00:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> nphilipp:BADURL:system-config-date-docs-1.0.8.tar.bz2:system-config-date-docs
> nphilipp:BADURL:system-config-nfs-1.3.49.tar.bz2:system-config-nfs
> nphilipp:BADURL:system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.7.tar.bz2:system-config-nfs-docs
> nphilipp:BADURL
Dne 19.1.2010 23:06, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> need more unstable apps!
I can easily prepare some nuke bombs ;)
--
Nikola
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
19 matches
Mail list logo
