Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 02:43:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible !
>> > > > C'est à
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 04:03 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > Because we don't set up Fedora's menu structure to have submenus, at
> > present.
>
> These submenus existed on FC6!!!
> I can provide photographies (not screenshots) if you don't trust me!
> As I show you in my previous message with the
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Unfortunately, this has proven to be hard/impossible so far.
>
> >> perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
>
> I intended to ta
I want to take qtiplot, because the maintainer of qtiplot becomes unresponsive
for nearly one year.
Since I am not a fedora packages yet, I need a sponser to review some of my
packages such as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207.
Chen Lei,
?--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> I had attempted to package it, since it would be probably of interest
> for the Design Suite, but building currently fails due to [1]. I'm not
> sure whether I'll be able to look into it over the next days, but if
> somebody e
On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
>> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
>> are the oldest non-building packages in the
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 02:43:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible !
> > > > C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!!
> > > > Un vrai dialogue de sourds...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please, is
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > >
> > > Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible !
> > > C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!!
> > > Un vrai dialogue de sourds...
> > >
> > >
> > > Please, is there a french speaking fedora developer to contact me
> and
> > > who
> > >
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 01:56:37, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 01:45 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 23:42:41, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > > > A good initiative, but seems to be stillbor
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 01:45 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 23:42:41, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > > A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In
> french :
> > > « mort-
> > > né ») as it seems to
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 23:42:41, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french :
> > « mort-
> > né ») as it seems to be optionnal.
> >
> > What I wanted to point is, as an example, my
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:24 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:12:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >
> > > xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
> >
> > This one
Hey Jeff,
I recently joined Red Hat to take care of GStreamer and related things.
[1] So you can almost expect me to help you with it once I got a hang of
things.
I'm already very good at fixing bugs and working with upstream, but I
lack knowledge in packaging and other Fedora related things. So w
Greetings Feature Owners,
Thanks for all the great work you are doing to make Fedora 13 our best
release ever.
I just did a quick review of the accepted pages we have so far for
Fedora 13 and there are a few that have not been updated since November
2009 or before. I made this determination
The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current
release (1.41.0) in rawhide for F13. More info here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F13Boost141
Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mandatory, as SONAME
was bumped. Help from package maintainers with rebu
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not fail
> to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that fail to
> build?
>
Because this isn't a fully proper non-responsive maintainer approach, we
felt it was on
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:58:54 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not
> fail to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that
> fail to build?
There may be some cases of that. If so, the non responsive maintainer
procedure should b
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really too full!
> There are 29 applications entries in it, this is unreadable.
>
> On FC6, my Utility menu have 7 submenus:
> - Accessibility
> - Office
> - Text editors
> - Files
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french :
> « mort-
> né ») as it seems to be optionnal.
>
> What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really
> too full!
> There are 29 applications entries in
Here's the logs from todays meeting.
Sorry for the delay in posting it. ;(
NOTE that we will be meeting on tuedays at 20:00 UTC moving forward.
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-15/fesco.2010-01-15-17.00.html
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-15/fesc
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:12:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> > xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
>
> This one also has a major policy breach issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:45:32 +0100
> From: Andrey Ivanov
> Here are some questions or remarks that i still do have after this reading:
> Citation:
> ---
> This function entryrdn_index_read finds out the entry_id of the given
>
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 20:49:49, Andrea Musuruane a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> > I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-(
> > And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question.
> > I'm talking about the Categories entry.
> >
> > I could see in some
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> = Support files for the Python language =
> /usr/bin/g-ir-scanner
I don't see any intrinsic value in having both versions of
g-ir-scanner available; this one should be in the other category, it's
just a program which happens to be impleme
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:06:09PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > What about the other packages of these maintainers? E.g. in the
> > recordmydesktop case, there were four bugs open with working patches
> > attached for that package. I di
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:45:05AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > This reasoning (needed for testing) doesn't appeal to me at all. The
> > general case should be that we switch applications in rawhide from python2
> > to python3. Test t
On 15/01/10 09:04 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2010/1/15 Matt Domsch:
>> OK, re-run, removing the three packages noted as fixed overnight.
>>
>> -
>> Removing geronimo-specs also removes:
> [ lots of stuff! ]
>
> Almost all of these are due to the dependency chain jms (virtual
> p
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:49 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal
> wrote:
> > I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-(
> > And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question.
> > I'm talking about the Categories entry.
> >
> > I could see in some des
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:04 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:17:21 +0100, Milos wrote:
>
> > On 15.1.2010 07:00, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >
> > > synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539195
> >
> > Synce-kde should be EOL'd already a lon
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
This one also has a major policy breach issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555836
(it ships its own copy of xerces)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedo
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> > > since the Fedora 11 time frame
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> > since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
> > are the oldest non-buil
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-(
> And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question.
> I'm talking about the Categories entry.
>
> I could see in some desktop files provided by applications that some
> distributions (Mandriva,
Le lundi 11 janvier 2010 09:24:28, Andrea Musuruane a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to improve the desktop file of a package I maintain, I should
> > want to know if there is a guideline for desktop file in Fedora.
> > google donẗ help me.
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:17 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Any package still orphaned as of the Feb 16 F13 Alpha freeze will be
> dropped per standard operating procedure.
>
>
I might attempt to drop them a bit earlier than alpha freeze, so that if
there is unexpected fallout we have time to fix it
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
> >Something wrong?
> >abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
> >
>
> What is it you're trying to process? If it's some big
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
> are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
> else (over 8800) mana
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:13:41 -0600, Matt wrote:
> Folks, while I appreciate you fixing these packages so they build
> again, _please_ do take the time to consider if they are unloved
> enough to be orphaned and dropped anyhow. If it's a leaf node in the
> dependency tree, dead upstream, and unres
On 01/15/2010 07:41 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 01/15/2010 11:33 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 01/15/2010 05:41 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:17:21 +0100, Milos wrote:
> On 15.1.2010 07:00, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> > synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.src.rpm
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539195
>
> Synce-kde should be EOL'd already a long time (it has been replaced by
> something else, can't remember deta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511749
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-01-15 13:56:07 EST ---
perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.51-1.fc11 has been submitted as an u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511749
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2010-01-15 13:56:02 EST ---
perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.51-1.fc12 has been submitted as an u
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 03:28 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> While checking over the orphaned package list (because I noticed an
>> old package of mine got orphaned, I thought I would check for others).
>>
>> I noticed glade2 is orph
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 18:51, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Any way I can get bugzilla to search closed bugs again by default with
> quicksearch? I really miss it.
> Maybe I need to learn search templates - is there such a thing?
If you click the Quick Search help link on the front page it gives
som
On 01/15/2010 01:00 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511749
This one is awaiting an upstream fix (probably coming with 0.6).
> perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5391
Any way I can get bugzilla to search closed bugs again by default with
quicksearch? I really miss it.
Maybe I need to learn search templates - is there such a thing?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-970
On 01/15/2010 11:33 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 05:41 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
>>> Something wrong?
>>> abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
>>>
>>
>> What is it you're tryi
On 01/15/2010 09:52 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> We are discussing the complete removal of pkgconfig support from openmpi
> (and never including it in mvapich and mvapich2 which are ready for
> Fedora package review submission). The proper way to invoke mpi
> compiles is through the use of the mpicc
On 01/15/2010 05:41 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
>> Something wrong?
>> abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
>>
>
> What is it you're trying to process? If it's some bigger thing like
> F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538984
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 15.1.2010 07:00, Matt Domsch wrote:
> synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539195
Synce-kde should be EOL'd already a long time (it has been replaced by
something else, can't remember details unfortunately anymore) -- I spoke
about this with the maint
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
> are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
> else (over 8800) mana
We are discussing the complete removal of pkgconfig support from openmpi
(and never including it in mvapich and mvapich2 which are ready for
Fedora package review submission). The proper way to invoke mpi
compiles is through the use of the mpicc (or equivalent) compiler
instead of directly via cc/
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > python3 is in rawhide and I'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-01-15 11:40:25
EST ---
fixed by update to upstream release 1.10
--
Configure bugmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-15
11:32:02 EST ---
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-1.fc12 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-15
11:32:47 EST ---
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 stack
> > > (help would be most
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511729
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> perl-SVN-Simple-0.27-7.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511729
Fixed.
Regards
Till
pgp2qGC6vBFrw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-2.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libplybootsplash.so.2
Another unannounced soname bump (different from yesterday).
Rebuilding again ...
Even after rebuilding libguestfs will be uninstallable unless you
manual
As only an occasional user of PiTiVi I don't have a lot of time &
experience to dedicate to maintaining PiTiVi and GNonlin, especially
as many of the bugs that get reported tend to be "real" bugs that
require working closely with upstream and/or digging into the code
yourself. Therefore, I'm hopin
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:48 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > -
> > Removing gmfsk also removes:
>
> This one is now fixed.
>
> > -
> > Removing gnome-scan also removes:
>
> There's a patch logged against thi
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
> are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
> else (over 8800) mana
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:51:56AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> 44 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
Is there any reason to not close them automatically except that it is
not yet coded?
Regards
Till
pgpeTwLtbCO7A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
d
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Anyone else interested in working on packaging this?
>>> Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs?
>> No. That's "Needs Work".
>
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While checking over the orphaned package list (because I noticed an
> old package of mine got orphaned, I thought I would check for others).
>
> I noticed glade2 is orphaned, that cannot be right ??
>
> Is there something repl
There will be an outage starting at Fri Jan 15 10:30:00 UTC, which is
ongoing.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d 'Fri Jan 15 10:30:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Fedora People
Unaffected Services:
Buildsystem
CV
Hi All,
While checking over the orphaned package list (because I noticed an
old package of mine got orphaned, I thought I would check for others).
I noticed glade2 is orphaned, that cannot be right ??
Is there something replacing it ? If so someone should mark
it dead.package and retire it in pk
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch :
> ohm-0.1.1-9.39.20091215git.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539200
This should be a dead package, upstream is no longer being maintained.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch :
> OK, re-run, removing the three packages noted as fixed overnight.
>
> -
> Removing geronimo-specs also removes:
[ lots of stuff! ]
Almost all of these are due to the dependency chain jms (virtual
provide) -> avalon-logkit -> velocity -> (all of maven). ava
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 02:48 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> There's a patch logged against this now FWIW
>
>> Removing Io-language also removes:
>
Thanks, given I owned this once upon a time I was
also working on a fix (np), but it took me a bit
1.2.2
- drop old patch now in upstream
- add new pkgconfig file to -devel
* Thu Jan 14 2010 Chris Weyl 1.2.2-2
- correct bad file entry under -devel
libvirt-0.7.5-3.fc13
----
* Thu Jan 14 2010 Chris Weyl 0.7.5-3
- bump for libssh2 rebuild
lvm2-2.02.58-1.fc13
-
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> -
> Removing gmfsk also removes:
This one is now fixed.
> -
> Removing gnome-scan also removes:
There's a patch logged against this now FWIW
> Removing Io-language also removes:
This one is now fixed.
> Re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2010-01-15 08:46:27 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for
On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
What is it you're trying to process? If it's some bigger thing like
Firefox or Openoffice it might take a really long time.
Jirka
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:23:44AM +, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2010/1/15 Matt Domsch :
> > Removing geronimo-specs removes these:
> > geronimo-specs-compat-0:1.0-2.M2.fc10.x86_64
>
> Eek! I think geronimo-specs-compat is (transitively) needed by a bunch
> of other Java packages including mav
Le Ven 15 janvier 2010 11:20, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> On 01/12/2010 02:26 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Also how will it interact with the new gnome colorimetry applet ?
>>
>
> I'm not aware of that applet, do you have a link with more info about it ?
I'm talking about the new colorimetry GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Le Ven 15 janvier 2010 11:19, Hans de Goede a écrit :
>
> I know :), note though that tv cards also have v4l2 controls, the things
> you are talking about are not controls though, there are separate ioctls
> for them.
[...]
> For uvc cams there is a well defined and limited set of controls.
W
This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 stack
> > (help would be most welcome!)
> >
> > I've run into a snag with the plan of building out
2010/1/15 Mary Ellen Foster :
> 2010/1/15 Matt Domsch :
>> Removing geronimo-specs removes these:
>> geronimo-specs-compat-0:1.0-2.M2.fc10.x86_64
>
> Eek! I think geronimo-specs-compat is (transitively) needed by a bunch
> of other Java packages including maven; on my computer, "yum remove
> geroni
2010/1/14 Matthew Garrett :
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
>> thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning
>> failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really
>> "randomly" but a common way to tune systems for maximized
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 11:33 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> Good idea, apart from:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
For Fedora-14 (to be released
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Good idea, apart from:
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >> For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have
> >> a
> >> gtk
2010/1/15 Matt Domsch :
> Removing geronimo-specs removes these:
> geronimo-specs-compat-0:1.0-2.M2.fc10.x86_64
Eek! I think geronimo-specs-compat is (transitively) needed by a bunch
of other Java packages including maven; on my computer, "yum remove
geronimo-specs" attempts to remove 45 packages
Hi,
On 01/12/2010 02:30 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:39 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>> For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have
>> a
>> gtk application for controlling various camera settings (brightness,
>> contrast, etc.) *a
On 01/12/2010 02:26 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
> Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 14:25, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
>>
>> Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 12:39, Hans de Goede a écrit :
>>
>>> Which remembered me that it would be nice to have a gtk app for
>>> controlling webcam settings like brightness, contrast,
Hi,
On 01/12/2010 02:25 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
> Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 12:39, Hans de Goede a écrit :
>
>> Which remembered me that it would be nice to have a gtk app for
>> controlling webcam settings like brightness, contrast, etc.
>
> It would be nice if it also handled non-webcam vide
Hi,
On 01/12/2010 03:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:19:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today I've rebased parted to parted-2.1, this means that the libparted
>> soname has changed, and all libparted using packages need to be rebuild:
>>
>> [h...@localho
Hi,
On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Good idea, apart from:
>
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have
>> a
>> gtk application for controlling various camera settings (brightness,
>> contras
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> awn-extras-applets-0.3.2.1-8.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511628
Fixed this trivial one.
C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Matt Domsch píše v Pá 15. 01. 2010 v 00:00 -0600:
> python-openhpi-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511675
finally got to fix it with a svn snapshot
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> recordmydesktop-0.3.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538931
I just fixed this as provenpackager. The original maintainer seems to be
unresponsive, because there was already another bug open since
2009-
96 matches
Mail list logo
