-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2010 09:05 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> *weak undefined* means "I accept *any* definition, or even *no* definition."
> Both binutils and glibc must fix their errors of insisting on any particular
> symbol version for a *weak undefined* symbol.
No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/10 03:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> This is a heads-up that the python3 package review [1] is done (thanks
> everyone!) and that python3 is now in Fedora [2]
>
> I've built python3-3.1.1-14.fc13 into rawhide here:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.o
This is a heads-up that the python3 package review [1] is done (thanks
everyone!) and that python3 is now in Fedora [2]
I've built python3-3.1.1-14.fc13 into rawhide here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1919905
I hope I haven't broken anything; I've been running with both vers
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:23 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> long time.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
>
> So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berl
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:54, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Oh, and let's note that other libraries have exactly the same
> > probs. Let's pick dbus for example which many might consider a
> > benchmark in many ways. There is dbus_shutdown() which does about the
> > same thing as xmlCleanupP
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Thanks, Seth. And if we don't, what's a good resource for security
> > auditing n00bs?
>
> 1) Look over the change history. Don't trust the source repository but
> older versions of the tar bal
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> The problem is that you can perfectly have application not relying on
> libxml2 outside of their own code use libxml2 at different phases,
> for example when parsing input, and when generating result, not using
> the library in the meantime and calling xmlCleanupParser() tw
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:39:43 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 13.01.10 16:07, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > Lennart Poettering writes:
> > > There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded
> > > into memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wante
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:07, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded into
> > memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wanted it, and then
> > used, and then unloaded again because the module got dlc
Lennart Poettering writes:
> There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded into
> memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wanted it, and then
> used, and then unloaded again because the module got dlcose'd again,
> won't you leak TLS vars unless the xmlCleanupParser() f
> But, you have added an explicit dependency upon libdb to your executable
> by mentioning -ldb on the gcc command line. Therefore libdb will be
> loaded at execution start-up. But libdb has a dependency upon
> libpthread, so that library will also be loaded at execution start-up.
> Hence whe
> Right - Obviously I had not considered the case of a weak reference to a
> symbol defined in an as-needed DSO. I'll look into it today.
You're going to confuse the poor bystanders by using the wrong terminology.
There is no issue with as-needed. It's only --no-add-needed we are talking
about
> > That's correct. In other words, the libfoo.so DSO will only be used at
> > runtime if the presence of -lfoo at link time actually had any effect on
> > what symbols got resolved to what. But --as-needed is not really apropos
> > in this thread.
>
> OK, if RPM picks only the libraries that ar
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
> Thanks, Seth. And if we don't, what's a good resource for security
> auditing n00bs?
1) Look over the change history. Don't trust the source repository but
older versions of the tar balls and see what has changed bet
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:00, Daniel Veillard (veill...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Afaik it does, i agree with Lennart that a warning from libxml2 would be
> > welcome.
>
> The problem is that you can perfectly have application not relying on
> libxml2 outside of their own code use libxml2 at different p
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:33 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> > long time.
> > if you're on this list then you need to talk to upstream and find out if
> > they have done an audit yet. You
Pierre-Yves writes:
> IMHO R2spec is here to help packagers to create/generate spec file
> as close as possible to the Fedora standards.
> Fedora's RPM will never be generated fully automatically and be
> maintained without human intervention that's against its philosophy.
I clearly need t
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > - "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
> > >
> > > So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
> >
> > As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
>
> That's correct. This change does not affect --as-needed at all.
Hi There
I am also happy to help with any of the three packages or co-maintain the three.
Jesus
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lemenkov"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:08:42 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Bern / Rome /
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:56 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > R-pls: [u'538957']
> > Pending for stable
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pierre
> >
>
> Stable what? these are rawhide things tha
2010/1/13 Matt Domsch :
> jline-0.9.94-0.4.fc12 (build/make) mbooth
Looks like you missed out on Mr. Kurtakov's fix for this one by the
narrowest of margins. (Thanks Alex.)
--
Mat Booth
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > R-pls: [u'538957']
> Pending for stable
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
Stable what? these are rawhide things that don't rebuild.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.c
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> 2010/1/13 Mike McGrath :
>> I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
>> anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
>
> I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteerin
>
> - "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
> >
> > So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
>
> As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
That's correct. This change does not affect --as-needed at all.
> The --as-needed flag will link libraries if
> A) they define symb
Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> long time.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
>
> So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berlios-pkg-owners-list.txt
>
>
> Here is
- Original Message -
From: "Toshio Kuratomi"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:27:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: nss version went backwards ?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 01/12/201
Hello All!
2010/1/13 Mike McGrath :
> I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
> anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteering?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers:
Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)?
I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351)
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:51 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> gmrun-0.9.2-16.fc11 (build/make) gilboa
A fixed gmrun is already in F12 updates-testing and rawhide.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers:
Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)?
I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351)
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:10:06PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:24 +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > >> $ g++ -o string string.o -ldb
> > >> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: string.11980.test: undefined reference to symbol
> > >> 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
> > >> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: note: 'pt
Hi folks,
This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
long time.
http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berlios-pkg-owners-list.txt
Here is the list as well:
arbiter:slim:http:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:01:54 +0100
Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
>
> Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide,
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:24 +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> >> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
> >> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
> >> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
> >>
> >> $ cat string.
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> R-pls: [u'538957']
Pending for stable
Regards,
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/13/2010 08:24 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>>> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
>>> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
>>> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
>>>
>>> $ cat string.cxx
>>> #inclu
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386
using rawhide as of 2010-01-10. This is a full rebuild of all 8812 packages.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
44 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
aldo: [u'539058']
apbs: [u'538881']
arts:
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
using rawhide as of 2010-01-10. This is a full rebuild of all 8812 packages.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
44 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
aldo: [u'539058']
apbs: [u'538881']
arts
commit 9f88491132cb2d1c5f11fd5475e1a6826e1dc7ee
Author: Endi S. Dewata
Date: Tue Jan 12 14:43:08 2010 -0600
Bug 553027 - Support for nsUniqueId and alias in Retro Changelog.
This patch adds support for storing the target's nsUniqueId in
change log re
cord and renaming any addition
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> > the repo.
> > Yum complains..
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (wh
Hi Guys,
>> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
>> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
>> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
>>
>> $ cat string.cxx
>> #include
>> int main()
>> {
>> return std::string("foo
On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> the repo.
> Yum complains..
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> nss-3.12.4-14.fc12.i686) is already installed
>
> What ha
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
> > > rjones:BADURL:mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32-src.tar.g
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:04:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-1.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(Image_intf) =
> 0:f81d11976accf8db51fbce0ac90013cb
A bug .. now fixed.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs let
- "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
>
> So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
If anyone reading this is interested/confused, I think the
difference is:
The --as-needed flag will link libraries if
A) they define symbols re
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:19:16AM +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 13/01/2010 02:07, Tom Lane a écrit :
> >
> > Why exactly is this a misuse, and not libxml2's bug to fix? There's
> > certainly nothing in their documentation suggesting that there's
> > such a requirement.
there is definitely,
Compose started at Wed Jan 13 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
DeviceKit-disks-009-3.fc12.i686 requires libparted-1.9.so.0
PyKDE-3.16.6-1.fc13.i686 requires sip-api(6) >= 0:6.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:23 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:54:40 -0500, Matthias wrote:
>
> > > The old semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new
> > > semantics lead to programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora
> > > incompatible with upstream (u
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:04:21 +, Adam wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:04 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 00:06 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > if so, Mandriva has been enforcing the fixing of this type of error for
> > > a couple of years now (by having
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:54:40 -0500, Matthias wrote:
> > The old semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new
> > semantics lead to programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora
> > incompatible with upstream (unless we start to ship .la files again).
>
> .pc files handle this
Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
>
>> rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
>> rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
>>
>
> Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
> commit su
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
> rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedorap
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:04 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 00:06 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > if so, Mandriva has been enforcing the fixing of this type of error for
> > a couple of years now (by having --as-needed and --no-undefined in the
> > default ld flags).
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 01:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 01:59 +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> > > Also I have really doubts what concerns upstreamability of the necessary
> > > changes in packages. Especially if other d
Enrico Scholz writes:
> I have problems to understand the xmlrpc-c build failure
>
> | /usr/bin/ld.bfd: xml-rpc-api2cpp.5842.test: undefined reference to symbol
> 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
It happens because a library where the program is linked against uses
pthread_* but is not linked agai
56 matches
Mail list logo
