On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:20 AM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On 10/22/24 5:44 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>
> > You can build whatever GPL-violating contraption as long as you don't
> > distribute it. If you do, you need to comply with the terms of the
> > license.
> > FWIW, GNU seems to think merely incl
Looks good. Thanks, Edhaya.
Reviewed-by: Sunny Wang
-Original Message-
From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of G Edhaya
Chandran via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 4:55 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] edk2-test: uefi-sct Increase the waiting
V2 is fix the coding style issue. Below is PR.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/6342
-Original Message-
From: Nong, Foster
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 8:55 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Nong, Foster ; Kinney, Michael D
; Liming Gao ; Ni, Ray
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] MdeModul
Hi,
Let me know if this isn't the correct place to post this, but I was directed
here from the Redfish forum. I work for a hardware company that develops
storage and network HBAs. We already expose a set of HII configuration
utilities for display and modification of settings and health data fo
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868
In current PCIE Resizable BAR feature, add below check:
1. Check Register Number of Resizable BARs is legal.
2. Check Register Register BAR Index is legal.
Signed-off-by: Foster Nong
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Ray Ni
---
Md
Added MM_STANDALONE support in Driver and BaseCryptLibOnProtocolPpi
---
CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dsc | 59 ++
CryptoPkg/Driver/CryptoStandaloneMm.c | 41 ++
CryptoPkg/Driver/CryptoStandaloneMm.inf | 48 +++
.../StandaloneMmCryptLib.c
Intel provides the UEFI driver source code for many of their popular
network chips at
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/download/15755/intel-ethernet-connections-boot-utility-preboot-images-and-efi-drivers.html
including:
Intel® Ethernet 800 Series
--
* Intel® Eth
I've been wondering if it might be worth adding nasm files to ArmPkg,
ArmPlatformPkg etc. to allow platforms to be built with VS2022 - mainly
because different compilers can detect different issues with the code.
What do people think: would it be worthwhile, or should we stick with
GCC and CLA
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868
1. Define a new dynamic PCD in MdeModulePkg
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPcieResizableMaxBarSize
2. Modify PciProgramResizableBar() to implement configure BAR Size
within platform constrain provided in PcdPcieResizableMaxBarSize
S
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868
1. Define a new dynamic PCD in MdeModulePkg
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPcieResizableMaxBarSize
2. Modify PciProgramResizableBar() to implement configure BAR Size
within platform constrain provided in PcdPcieResizableMaxBarSize
S
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868
In current PCIE Resizable BAR feature, add below check:
1. Check Register Number of Resizable BARs is legal.
2. Check Register Register BAR Index is legal.
Signed-off-by: Foster Nong
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Ray Ni
---
Md
V2 is fix the coding style issue. Below is PR.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/6342
-Original Message-
From: Nong, Foster
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 8:55 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Nong, Foster ; Kinney, Michael D
; Liming Gao ; Ni, Ray
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModul
Readme is updated with the UEFI specification tested by UEFI SCT.
Also the new readthedocs.io link for SCT Case Spec is updated
Signed-off-by: G Edhaya Chandran
---
uefi-sct/Readme.md | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/uefi-sct/Readme.md b/uefi-sct/Readme.md
index 1a049b60
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 12:19, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> In addition, since GCC48, GCC49 and GCC5 have been marked deprecated for
> over a year, I'd like to proceed with removing them as well.
>
> Please provide feedback by Thursday October 31st. In the absence of
> feedback I'll plan to proceed with r
*Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO*
*When:*
Wednesday, October 23, 2024
5:30pm to 6:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_OTk1YzJhN2UtOGQwNi00NjY4LWEwMTktY2JiODRlYTY1NmY0%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2246c98d88-e34
Sure, that’s not a problem.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024, at 9:23 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will need more time to review this impacts of this proposal.
>
> Can we extend the timeline for comments to mid November.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel@edk2.grou
Hi,
I will need more time to review this impacts of this proposal.
Can we extend the timeline for comments to mid November.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Leif
> Lindholm via groups.io
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 5:15 AM
> To: devel@e
Hi tdoedline,
For the UEFI Redfish design and implementation, please check below links:
*
Redfish foundation support:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/tree/master/RedfishPkg
*
Redfish application implementation by using RedfishPkg:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-redfish-client/tree/mai
18 matches
Mail list logo
