*** BLURB HERE ***
Evan Chai (5):
Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg: remove redundant CpuDxe driver
Platform/Sifive: remove redundant TimerDxe from Platform
Silicon/RISC-V: remove redundant RiscVTimerLib
Silicon/RISC-V: remove redundant function code from RiscVCpuLib
Platform/ Siliocn/: Fix bu
UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxeRiscV64 will replace it later.
Cc: Daniel Schaefer
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Signed-off-by: Evan Chai
---
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U500.dsc | 2 +-
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U500.fdf | 2 +-
Pla
It will be replaced by UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerDxeRiscV64.
Cc: Daniel Schaefer
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Signed-off-by: Evan Chai
---
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U500.dsc | 2 +-
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U500.fdf | 2 +
It will be replaced by UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseRiscV64CpuTimerLib.
Cc: Daniel Schaefer
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Signed-off-by: Evan Chai
---
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U500.dsc | 11
++-
Platform/SiFive/U5SeriesPkg/FreedomU500VC707Board/U
They had been implemented in MdePkg/Library/BaseLib
Cc: Daniel Schaefer
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Signed-off-by: Evan Chai
---
Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/Library/RiscVCpuLib.h | 20
+---
Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVCpuLib/Cpu.S | 41
+--
RiscVSbiLib was implemented in MdePkg/Library/BaseRiscVSbiLib.
Cc: Daniel Schaefer
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Signed-off-by: Evan Chai
---
Platform/RISC-V/PlatformPkg/Library/ResetSystemLib/ResetSystemLib.c
| 4 +++-
Platform/RISC-V/PlatformPkg/Library/ResetS
On 3/28/23 7:19 PM, gaoliming wrote:
GCC49 is one GCC tool chain without LTO enable option. GCC5 is another GCC tool
chain with LTO enable option.
They have the different usage. I suggest to keep GCC49 and GCC5 both, and also
keep their name as is.
Is anything still _using_ GCC49 though? Si
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 17:41, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On 3/28/23 7:19 PM, gaoliming wrote:
>
> > GCC49 is one GCC tool chain without LTO enable option. GCC5 is another GCC
> > tool chain with LTO enable option.
> >
> > They have the different usage. I suggest to keep GCC49 and GCC5 both, and
> >
NOOPT builds can be very valuable to find these types of issues.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2023 9:37 AM
> To: Rebecca Cran
> Cc: Gao, Liming ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Oliver
> Smith-Denny ; Jiang, Guomin
>
Hi Gerd,
I have investigated this failure with enabling -smp 4. I think this is an
important feature that should be on by default.
I did find that the results where inconsistent at 2 or 4 cpus on my laptop,
but going 8 or higher would fail consistently. I used -smp 32 for all the
testing below.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 4:41 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On 3/28/23 7:19 PM, gaoliming wrote:
>
> > GCC49 is one GCC tool chain without LTO enable option. GCC5 is another GCC
> > tool chain with LTO enable option.
> >
> > They have the different usage. I suggest to keep GCC49 and GCC5 both, and
>
On 4/2/23 12:38 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
As expressed off-list on UEFI talkbox, I like GCCNOLTO, but I would
rather keep GCC5 as GCC5, for the next future iteration of "lets bump
a new toolchain because we need feature X".
Given we've gone from GCC 5 through 12 with no new toolchains, I'd
pref
*Reminder: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*
*When:*
Monday, April 3, 2023
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/discussions/2614
View Event ( https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/viewevent?eventid=1753772 )
*Description:*
TianoCo
On Friday, March 31, 2023 10:49 PM, Joeyli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:25:09AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 03:59:56PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > > Hi Gerd,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:50:53AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 01
Patrick:
Can you give the reproduce step to generate ELF image that doesn't work with
the option max-page-size?
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io 代表 Marvin
> H?user
> 发送时间: 2023年3月31日 18:58
> 收件人: gaoliming
> 抄送: devel@edk2.groups.io; patrick.rudo...@9elements.com;
> guo.d...@intel
Patch merged via:
PR - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/4207
Commit -
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/eb6a74827200eedc81b8f45f332d6e9f3b3d2906
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
From: Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 10:30 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wu, Hao A ; Albec
Hi,
I cannot reproduce the issue on my setup. Please ignore it for now.
Regards,
Patrick Rudolph
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:52 AM gaoliming via groups.io
wrote:
>
> Patrick:
> Can you give the reproduce step to generate ELF image that doesn't work
> with the option max-page-size?
>
> > -邮件原
Chasel,
With your changes, the flow is like:
1. check revision of loaded microcode, go to Done if it's not zero
2. find first matching microcode
3. check revision of loaded microcode, go to Done if it equals to the matching
one
4. load the matching microcode
Done: return fail/success depending on
18 matches
Mail list logo
