Re: [edk2-devel] Question about Block IO protocol devices

2022-01-27 Thread valerij zaporogeci
Thanks again for your explanatory answers. Indeed, BlockIo->Media->LogicalPartition is more than enough. Admittedly, I overlooked that field. And now I can confidently tell to those firmware writers about the bug. it's uboot cough cough. :D -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all

Re: [edk2-devel] Question about Block IO protocol devices

2022-01-27 Thread Andrew Fish via groups.io
> On Jan 27, 2022, at 6:19 PM, valerij zaporogeci wrote: > > Thank you, Andrew, for the clarification. > >> I don’t remember the use case for HD(0,MBR, sign) type of device path node? > > don't know, how much of usability it would have per se, but > representing a raw disk this way, would giv

Re: [edk2-devel] Question about Block IO protocol devices

2022-01-27 Thread valerij zaporogeci
Thank you, Andrew, for the clarification. > I don’t remember the use case for HD(0,MBR, sign) type of device path node? don't know, how much of usability it would have per se, but representing a raw disk this way, would give an easier way to find them out. because all such would end with the same

Re: [edk2-devel] Question about Block IO protocol devices

2022-01-27 Thread Andrew Fish via groups.io
> On Jan 27, 2022, at 4:34 PM, valerij zaporogeci wrote: > > Hi, edk2. I would be glad to clarify one thing. When I request all > handles, on which Block IO protocol (BIOP) is installed (through > LocateHandleBuffer(ByProtocol), and then open Device Path protocol > (DPP) on every of them to se