Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-24 Thread Liming Gao
0190215.0.0INFO > > Mu-Basetools2019.03.1 INFO > > mu_nasm 2.14.02 INFO > > > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > I would be happy to queue up this topic for next design > > meeting and open it up to questions? I hope others > > wo

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-23 Thread Michael D Kinney
ook prior to meeting. > > Thanks > Sean > > > > -Original Message- > From: Kinney, Michael D > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 2:56 PM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Sean Brogan > ; r...@edk2.groups.io; > Kinney, Michael D > Cc: Bret Barkelew &g

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-20 Thread Sean via Groups.Io
reserved=0 Thanks, Mike > -Original Message- > From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Sean > via Groups.Io > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 7:22 PM > To: r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D > ; devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: Bret Barkelew > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel]

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-19 Thread Michael D Kinney
Thanks, Mike > -Original Message- > From: devel@edk2.groups.io On > Behalf Of Sean via Groups.Io > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 7:22 PM > To: r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D > ; devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: Bret Barkelew > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel]

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-19 Thread Michael D Kinney
; To: r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D > ; devel@edk2.groups.io > Cc: Bret Barkelew > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous > Integration Phase 1 > > Mike, as you mentioned we have been working towards > enabling a practical and extensible CI for Edk2 using > Az

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-19 Thread Michael D Kinney
Responses below. Mike > -Original Message- > From: Gao, Liming > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 1:44 AM > To: r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D > ; devel@edk2.groups.io > Subject: RE: [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase > 1 > > Mike: > I add my comments. > > >-Original

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-16 Thread rebecca
On 8/29/19 2:22 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote: The following link is a link to an EDK II WIKI page that contains a summary of the work to date. Please provide feedback in the EDK II mailing lists. The WIKI pages will be updated with input from the entire EDK II community. https://github.com

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-16 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hi Sean, On 09/13/19 23:00, sean.brogan via [] wrote: > These tests require using the "edk2-pytool" stuff but are easy to integrate > with the github PR or CI flow.  Example of it running the code compliance > tests is here: > https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/edk2-ci-play/_build?definitionId=13&

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-09-13 Thread Sean via Groups.Io
These tests require using the "edk2-pytool" stuff but are easy to integrate with the github PR or CI flow.  Example of it running the code compliance tests is here: https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/edk2-ci-play/_build?definitionId=13&_a=summary A test run takes about 3 minutes. The past week or

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-30 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hi Sean, On 08/30/19 04:21, Sean via Groups.Io wrote: > would like to see these two efforts merged together. > Currently if the full set of tests are run we take about 20 minutes. > This is because compiling MdeModulePkg for debug, release, and host > based tests take a while. Most other package

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-30 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 08/30/19 10:43, Liming Gao wrote: > Mike: > I add my comments. > >> -Original Message- >> From: r...@edk2.groups.io [mailto:r...@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Michael >> D Kinney >> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 4:23 AM >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; r...@edk2.groups.io >> Subject: [edk

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-30 Thread Liming Gao
Mike: I add my comments. >-Original Message- >From: r...@edk2.groups.io [mailto:r...@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Michael >D Kinney >Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 4:23 AM >To: devel@edk2.groups.io; r...@edk2.groups.io >Subject: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 > >H

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-29 Thread Sean via Groups.Io
Mike, as you mentioned we have been working towards enabling a practical and extensible CI for Edk2 using Azure dev ops and the recently added edk2-pytool infrastructure. We have been using similar CI for Project Mu for the last few years. Our approach is a little different in that we focus on

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-29 Thread Michael Zimmermann
Hi Michael, would it make sense to run SCT (using UnixHost and/or qemu) to verify the high level logic or do you think that would be too much to do for each PR? Also, do we want to run all these checks for each commit in the PR to verify that they pass at each point in the git history? Thanks Mi

Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1

2019-08-29 Thread Michael D Kinney
scoped tests are another option. Mike > -Original Message- > From: Michael Zimmermann > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 1:40 PM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D > > Cc: r...@edk2.groups.io > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous > Int