Le Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:06:13PM -0700, Rebecca Cran a écrit :
> On 2/2/23 14:49, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
>
This above is misleading: this is not Brian J. Johnson who wrote what is
below: this is me (Thierry Laronde):
> > Hum... There is a very lethal weapon actually in use: the pillow. I
> >
Getting a patch reviewed by one maintainer and having the rest not respond even
after multiple(!) pings is not „missed“. Let‘s be realistic here.
When I was still actively subscribed to the list, I had all mails that CC‘d me
go to a separate folder. If I had more patch traffic, I would have had
On 2/2/23 14:49, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
Hum... There is a very lethal weapon actually in use: the pillow. I
already sent various patches and they are silently ignored...
If my contribution will be ignored as others have been till now, honesty
should be to clearly state: "we don't care and we w
nson
HPE
Original Message
From: tlaro...@polynum.com [mailto:tlaro...@polynum.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 11:59 AM
To: Gerd Hoffmann
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm
, Michael D Kinney
Subject: [edk2-devel] edk2setup.sh shortcomings
Le Thu
Le Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:50:32PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:29:32PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > edk2setup.sh has shortcomings. To list some:
> >
> > - The functions return a status but it is not tested; hence the
> > script goes to the end wi
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:29:32PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> edk2setup.sh has shortcomings. To list some:
>
> - The functions return a status but it is not tested; hence the
> script goes to the end with a final "return $?" that simply
> returns the status of the l
edk2setup.sh has shortcomings. To list some:
- The functions return a status but it is not tested; hence the
script goes to the end with a final "return $?" that simply
returns the status of the last command that is "unset" which
always successfully unsets, ev
