> On 7. Apr 2023, at 14:00, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> (cc Ray)
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 13:05, Marvin Häuser wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7. Apr 2023, at 13:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> IIRC DLINK2_FLAGS is mainly being used (in the GCC case) for passing
>> options that need to come after previo
(cc Ray)
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 13:05, Marvin Häuser wrote:
>
>
> On 7. Apr 2023, at 13:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> IIRC DLINK2_FLAGS is mainly being used (in the GCC case) for passing
> options that need to come after previous occurrences of the same
> option with a different value, in order f
> On 7. Apr 2023, at 13:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> IIRC DLINK2_FLAGS is mainly being used (in the GCC case) for passing
> options that need to come after previous occurrences of the same
> option with a different value, in order for the DLINK2 one to take
> precedence.
Thanks for the quick r
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 12:14, Marvin Häuser wrote:
>
> Good day everyone,
>
> I've been asked to check the following patch:
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102168
>
> One thing I noticed was that -no-pie is added to DLINK2_FLAGS, not
> DLINK_FLAGS. For MSVC toolchains, DLINK2_FLAGS is us
Good day everyone,
I've been asked to check the following patch:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102168
One thing I noticed was that -no-pie is added to DLINK2_FLAGS, not DLINK_FLAGS.
For MSVC toolchains, DLINK2_FLAGS is used for a separate linker step [1]
introduced by [2], which makes
