Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-25 Thread Purma, Kondal R
:28 AM To: Matthew Carlson ; devel@edk2.groups.io Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo On 04/22/20 21:30, macarl via [] wrote: > I think you've got it. The version of basetools will be carried via a > pip-requirements file. > > Where would "pip

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-24 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/22/20 21:30, macarl via [] wrote: > I think you've got it. The version of basetools will be carried via a > pip-requirements file. > > Where would "pip install -r pip-requirements.txt" *fetch* the required > basetools version from? > I believe that it has a cache internal to pip. But if yo

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-22 Thread Matthew Carlson via groups.io
I think you've got it. The version of basetools will be carried via a pip-requirements file. Where would "pip install -r pip-requirements.txt" *fetch* the required basetools version from? I believe that it has a cache internal to pip. But if you want to fetch a basetools that hasn't been fetche

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-22 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hello Matthew, On 04/22/20 02:05, macarl via [] wrote: > Hey Lazlo, > > This is a great point of discussion. Just to make sure we're on the same > page, let me paraphrase your scenario. Two features at the same time or a > improperly tested new feature were committed in BaseTools and a new rele

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-21 Thread Matthew Carlson via groups.io
Hey Lazlo, This is a great point of discussion. Just to make sure we're on the same page, let me paraphrase your scenario. Two features at the same time or a improperly tested new feature were committed in BaseTools and a new release was spun out. EDK2 was updated to have it's pip-requirements.

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-21 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/20/20 20:23, Sean Brogan wrote: > Laszlo, > > PIP vs Submodules: > The issue with submodule and not using python packages (pip is really just a > super convenient helper to install that consistently) is that it requires the > paradigm of file system python path management. Think of this a

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-20 Thread Purma, Kondal R
via groups.io Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 11:23 AM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; ler...@redhat.com; Matthew Carlson Cc: Ni, Ray ; Ard Biesheuvel (ARM address) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo Laszlo, PIP vs Submodules: The issue with submodule and not using

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-20 Thread Sean via groups.io
ress) Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo On 04/17/20 03:40, Ni, Ray wrote: > From: Matthew Carlson > mailto:mac...@microsoft.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 4:42 AM > To: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@intel.com>>; Sean

Re: [edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-20 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/17/20 03:40, Ni, Ray wrote: > From: Matthew Carlson mailto:mac...@microsoft.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 4:42 AM > To: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@intel.com>>; Sean Brogan > mailto:sean.bro...@microsoft.com>> > Subject: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo > > Hello Ray, > > I sent

[edk2-devel] FW: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo

2020-04-16 Thread Ni, Ray
From: Ni, Ray Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 1:41 PM To: 'Sean Brogan' ; Matthew Carlson Cc: Feng, Bob C ; edk2-de...@lists.01.org Subject: Discussion: Basetools a separate repo Sean, Matthew needs to join the edk2.groups.io and sends message from the registered mail address in order to send