ject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Fine-grained review ownership for
> MdeModulePkg
>
> Hi Hao Wu,
>
> Are you ready to send out a v1 yet? (Or did I miss it?)
> I would prefer to get this in before the GetMaintainer.py script, and
> after the comment updates to Maintainers.txt.
Sor
Hi Hao Wu,
Are you ready to send out a v1 yet? (Or did I miss it?)
I would prefer to get this in before the GetMaintainer.py script, and
after the comment updates to Maintainers.txt.
Best Regards,
Leif
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 01:16:05AM +, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> With Leif's comm
thanks
How about to put driversample to ui?
How about to put iommu to device?
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年6月25日，上午4:30，Laszlo Ersek 写道：
>
>> On 06/24/19 03:16, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> With Leif's comment on the better usage of the wildcard character & 'X:' tag:
>> https://ed
On 06/24/19 03:16, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> With Leif's comment on the better usage of the wildcard character & 'X:' tag:
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42587
>
> The list is updated as shown below.
>
> Also, I forgot to mention that some directory/file may be classified into
Hello all,
With Leif's comment on the better usage of the wildcard character & 'X:' tag:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42587
The list is updated as shown below.
Also, I forgot to mention that some directory/file may be classified into
multiple classes. I think it is a valid case, for ex
Justen, Jordan L; Ard Biesheuvel; Gao, Liming; Yao, Jiewen; Zeng, Star
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Fine-grained review ownership for
> MdeModulePkg
>
> On 2019-06-10 02:06, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Driven by the issue raised and discussions wi
On 2019-06-10 02:06, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Driven by the issue raised and discussions with thread:
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/31907735#42076
>
> This RFC proposal is raised to work out a fine-grained review ownership
> for MdeModulePkg.
Being an RFC, I think this should be
On 06/19/19 11:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:09:40AM +, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As suggested by Ray and Leif, modules (with wildcard) in MdeModulePkg are
>> classified to a list of features.
>>
>> Please note that:
>> * The below list is a draft at this mome
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:09:40AM +, Wu, Hao A wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As suggested by Ray and Leif, modules (with wildcard) in MdeModulePkg are
> classified to a list of features.
>
> Please note that:
> * The below list is a draft at this moment, please help to provide
> feedbacks/commen
Hello all,
As suggested by Ray and Leif, modules (with wildcard) in MdeModulePkg are
classified to a list of features.
Please note that:
* The below list is a draft at this moment, please help to provide
feedbacks/comments;
* Modules with no clear classification are listed under the 'Misc' sect
On 06/11/19 11:51, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Hi Wu Hao,
>
> I am working on a proposal (and proof-of-concept) machine readable
> Maintainers.txt format, and a GetMaintainer.py script, based on the
> format used by QEMU.
>
> One of the key features of that format is the F: tag, which specifes a
> fil
Hi Wu Hao,
I am working on a proposal (and proof-of-concept) machine readable
Maintainers.txt format, and a GetMaintainer.py script, based on the
format used by QEMU.
One of the key features of that format is the F: tag, which specifes a
filesytem path (with wildcard support).
While this is just
Hello all,
Driven by the issue raised and discussions with thread:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/31907735#42076
This RFC proposal is raised to work out a fine-grained review ownership
for MdeModulePkg.
The goal is to update the 'MdeModulePkg' section in file Maintainers.txt
to resemble th
13 matches
Mail list logo
