XiaoyuX ; Gao, Liming
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1d
>
> Laszlo,
>
> Thank you for the tests. I also tried secure boot (linux, windows) on both
> OVMF
> and
> Intel platform. All work well.
>
> Regards,
> Jian
>
> &
c: Wang, Jian J ; Lu, XiaoyuX ;
> Gao, Liming
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1d
>
> On 11/04/19 17:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 11/01/19 07:55, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> >> Update openssl from 1.1.1b to 1.1.1d.
> >> So
On 11/04/19 17:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/01/19 07:55, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
>> Update openssl from 1.1.1b to 1.1.1d.
>> Something needs to be noticed is that, there is a bug existing in the
>> released 1_1_1d version(894da2fb7ed5d314ee5c2fc9fd2d9b8b74111596),
>> which causes build failure. S
On 11/01/19 07:55, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> Update openssl from 1.1.1b to 1.1.1d.
> Something needs to be noticed is that, there is a bug existing in the
> released 1_1_1d version(894da2fb7ed5d314ee5c2fc9fd2d9b8b74111596),
> which causes build failure. So we switch the code base to a usable
> versi
Laszlo,
You're right. I'll do more tests for secure boot. I'll leave https boot to you.
Regards,
Jian
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2019 6:03 AM
> To: Wang, Jian J ; Zhang, Shenglei
> ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Lu, XiaoyuX ; Gao, Liming
> Su
On 11/01/19 08:31, Wang, Jian J wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> I did simple ovmf boot tests (shell, linux, windows) and all passed. Let me
> know if you have
> any comments or want to do more tests against v4 before check in.
>
> Based on my review and tests,
>Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang
I can get t
Hi Laszlo,
I did simple ovmf boot tests (shell, linux, windows) and all passed. Let me
know if you have
any comments or want to do more tests against v4 before check in.
Based on my review and tests,
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang
Regards,
Jian
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Shengle
Update openssl from 1.1.1b to 1.1.1d.
Something needs to be noticed is that, there is a bug existing in the
released 1_1_1d version(894da2fb7ed5d314ee5c2fc9fd2d9b8b74111596),
which causes build failure. So we switch the code base to a usable
version, which is 2 commits later than the stable tag.
No
