ups.io; Lu, XiaoyuX
>>
>> Cc: Ye, Ting
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
>>
>> Hi Jian,
>>
>> On 05/14/19 09:03, Wang, Jian J wrote:
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mail
s.io; Wang, Jian J ; Lu,
> XiaoyuX
> >>
> >> Cc: Ye, Ting
> >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to
> 1.1.1b
>
> >> Honestly the best I could suggest is, "use RDRAND if available, fall
> >> back to
Hi Jian,
On 05/14/19 09:03, Wang, Jian J wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 12:15 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wang, Jian J ; Lu, XiaoyuX
>>
>> Cc: Ye, Ting
>> Subject:
Laszlo,
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 12:15 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wang, Jian J ; Lu, XiaoyuX
>
> Cc: Ye, Ting
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.
Thanks,
Laszlo
>
> Regards,
> Jian
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
>> Laszlo Ersek
>> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:30 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Lu, XiaoyuX
>> Cc: Wang, Jia
; Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:30 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Lu, XiaoyuX
> Cc: Wang, Jian J ; Ye, Ting
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
>
> On 05/09/19 19:15, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> > How about the follo
[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
Hi Xiaoyu,
On 05/09/19 07:23, Xiaoyu lu wrote:
> From: Xiaoyu Lu
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
>
> Update OpenSSL submodule to OpenSSL_1_1_1b
> OpenSSL_1_1_1b(50eaac9f3337667259de7
Hi Xiaoyu,
On 05/09/19 07:23, Xiaoyu lu wrote:
> From: Xiaoyu Lu
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
>
> Update OpenSSL submodule to OpenSSL_1_1_1b
> OpenSSL_1_1_1b(50eaac9f3337667259de725451f201e784599687)
I found another issue, while trying to cross-build this series
On 05/09/19 19:15, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> How about the following:
>
> - It seems like we cannot convince OpenSSL to *never* call these
> functions, under UEFI.
>
> - We also cannot provide an implementation that is *guaranteed* to be
> secure enough, IMO.
>
> - It seems like these functions
(please read my email until my signature)
On 05/09/19 07:23, Xiaoyu lu wrote:
> From: Xiaoyu Lu
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
>
> Update OpenSSL submodule to OpenSSL_1_1_1b
> OpenSSL_1_1_1b(50eaac9f3337667259de725451f201e784599687)
>
> Run process_files.pl script
From: Xiaoyu Lu
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
Update OpenSSL submodule to OpenSSL_1_1_1b
OpenSSL_1_1_1b(50eaac9f3337667259de725451f201e784599687)
Run process_files.pl script to regenerate OpensslLib[Crypto].inf
and opensslconf.h
Remove NO_SYSLOG from OpensslLib[C
11 matches
Mail list logo
