On 8/27/20 3:06 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 8/20/20 4:41 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 8/20/20 2:59 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 8/20/20 6:42 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Rather than exporting the temp sensor or mailbox
in ACPI land we can wrap them in AML and use the default
ACPI drivers prov
On 8/20/20 4:41 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On 8/20/20 2:59 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 8/20/20 6:42 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Rather than exporting the temp sensor or mailbox
in ACPI land we can wrap them in AML and use the default
ACPI drivers provided by the OS. This enables the use of
"se
Hi,
On 8/20/20 2:59 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 8/20/20 6:42 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Rather than exporting the temp sensor or mailbox
in ACPI land we can wrap them in AML and use the default
ACPI drivers provided by the OS. This enables the use of
"sensors" in linux to report the SOC temp.
T
On 8/20/20 6:42 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Rather than exporting the temp sensor or mailbox
in ACPI land we can wrap them in AML and use the default
ACPI drivers provided by the OS. This enables the use of
"sensors" in linux to report the SOC temp.
This commit also adds a basic passive cooling ACP
Rather than exporting the temp sensor or mailbox
in ACPI land we can wrap them in AML and use the default
ACPI drivers provided by the OS. This enables the use of
"sensors" in linux to report the SOC temp.
This commit also adds a basic passive cooling ACPI thermalzone
with trip points for passive