: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
(SEV-SNP) support
[AMD Official Use Only]
Without UefiCpuPkg we will have a broken SNP support and I would prefer not to
commit a broken SEV-SNP support. The UefiCpuPkg is required for the multiple
CPU boot and based all the feedback we
; Gerd
Hoffmann ; Ni, Ray ; Kumar, Rahul1
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
(SEV-SNP) support
[AMD Official Use Only]
Hi,
I am not getting any response from the UefiCpuPkg maintainers, I am not sure
if the Ray/Rahul are on vacation or need more
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
(SEV-SNP) support
[AMD Official Use Only]
Hi,
I am not getting any response from the UefiCpuPkg maintainers, I am not sure
if the Ray/Rahul are on vacation or need more information.
Jiewen and Gerd,
Any recommendations
, Jordan L ; Ard
Biesheuvel ; Erdem Aktas ;
Roth, Michael ; Gerd Hoffmann ; Ray Ni
; Rahul Kumar
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
(SEV-SNP) support
Hi Ray and Rahul,
Gentle ping. Could you please Ack or R-b the files touched in UefiCpuPkg?
-Brijesh
On 10/29
er 25, 2021 7:54 AM
>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
>>> Cc: brijesh.si...@amd.com; James Bottomley ; Xu, Min M
>>> ; Tom Lendacky ; Justen,
>>> Jordan L ; Ard Biesheuvel
>>> ; Erdem Aktas ;
>>> Michael Roth ; Gerd Hoffmann
>>
Aktas ;
>> Michael Roth ; Gerd Hoffmann
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
>> (SEV-SNP) support
>>
>> Thank Jiewen,
>>
>> I have ping'ed UefiCpuPkg maintainer (Ray and Rahul) on every patch
>> which tou
,
> Jordan L ; Ard Biesheuvel
> ; Erdem Aktas ;
> Michael Roth ; Gerd Hoffmann
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging
> (SEV-SNP) support
>
> Thank Jiewen,
>
> I have ping'ed UefiCpuPkg maintainer (Ray and Rahul) on every patch
>
Thank Jiewen,
I have ping'ed UefiCpuPkg maintainer (Ray and Rahul) on every patch
which touches the UefiCpuPkg. If maintainer wants me to rework on
something then I will work accordingly. If they are okay with v11 then
now the merge will create a conflict (due to the TDX patches merge
commit). I h
I have not heard from UefiCpuPkg maintainers yet. Hopefully we get the
Ack or R-b. Ray asked me to move the AmdSev in the common file which I did.
thanks
On 10/23/21 8:46 PM, Yao, Jiewen via groups.io wrote:
> Yes. I will try my best to merge.
>
> I checked the patch set but I did not find the "
Yes. I will try my best to merge.
I checked the patch set but I did not find the "R-B" from UefiCpuPkg
maintainer. Neither from email nor from you v11.
Did I miss something?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Brijesh Singh
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2021 12:13 PM
>
Hi Gerd and Jiewen,
CI was a bit unstable during my v10 submission, so, I was not able to
run it to the completion. Finally, I managed to get the CI going,
and it reported few Windows 32-bit build errors. The v11 fixes those build
errors. Please consider this for the merge.
Thank you so much fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
