...@apple.com
> Cc: Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ;
> Gao, Zhichao ;
> Kinney, Michael D ; Wang, Sunny (HPS SW)
>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-discuss] [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic
> BM enumeration
>
> Sorry for the delay. Somehow I didn't catch the follow-up ema
day, December 11, 2019 4:46 AM
To: Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com; disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss
, December 12, 2019 10:52 AM
To: Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io ;
Laszlo Ersek ; af...@apple.com ;
disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Thanks for the
devel@edk2.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com; disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss this at the design meeting this week (12/12)?
Tha
inghal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss this at the design meeting this week (12/12)?
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Jeff Brasen
Sent: Thursday, November
J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Yes, I think that would be good.
Summarizing everything in this thread
Problem: Platform needs to customize the boot options, this can be done for
normal boot but
, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Yes, I think that would be good.
Summarizing everything in this thread
Problem: Platform needs to customize the boot options, this can be done for
normal boot but the UiApp calls
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:09 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen ; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
I think it's a
o On Behalf Of Jeff Brasen
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 2:43 AM
To: Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Thi
an J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
I am not sure a PCD would work (unless I am missing something) We do want to do
a connect all and re-enumerate in UiApp but we need the platform code to be
involve
@edk2.groups.io ; Jeff Brasen
; Laszlo Ersek ; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
If adding a PCD to control UiApp can meet the real needs, I
.groups.io; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
If we are concerned about deploying this and breaking builds we could do this
via a new protocol instead. In that
ael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 11/07/19 18:46, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Fixing UiApp seems reasonable, I do think we would want a hook to the
> platform library in here as the enumeration that occurs in the UiApp is
> intended to do a full
@apple.com
> Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo Ersek
> ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
> ; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> I treat the issue in this way:
>
> 1. Platform Boot Manager lib
, November 7, 2019 12:21 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen ; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo Ersek ;
Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ; Gao,
Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
I treat the issue in this way:
1
Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
The issue is there are some auto created options we do not want on our platform.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@intel.com&g
Ashish Singhal
; Laszlo Ersek ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
RefreshAllBootOption() only modifies/creates the auto-created boot options. For
the boot options created by platform boot m
lto:hao.a...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
mailto:zhichao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen
mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>> w
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 12:13 PM
To: af...@apple.com; Ni, Ray
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo
Ersek ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
As the suggestions below made
9:20 AM
To: Ni, Ray
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen ; Ashish Singhal
; Laszlo Ersek ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Ray,
Is there an obvious hook point we could point Jeff and Ashish at
On 11/06/19 17:15, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:56 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>> On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>>> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
>>> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
>>
>> Yes,
hal ; Laszlo Ersek
> ; Ni, Ray ; Wang, Jian J
> ; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
> ; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen <mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>
> On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:56 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
>> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
>
> Yes, it most likely would.
Should we write a BZ fo
On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
Yes, it most likely would.
[...]
Thanks
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages
rsek ;
Ni, Ray ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen
mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
Wouldn't having a variable that we create and del
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>
>
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
> What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to
> modify the attribute
Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to modify
the attributes of the auto created variable to disable it with hidden/!active
ng, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 11/05/19 19:00, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> I agree that I can use the platform boot manager protocol to modify
> the boot variable and give the custom optional data
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 5:19 PM, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
> What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to
> modify the attributes o
Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to modify
the attributes of the auto created variable to disable it with hidden/!active
On 11/05/19 19:00, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> I agree that I can use the platform boot manager protocol to modify
> the boot variable and give the custom optional data I need, but that
> would not stop UefiBootManagerLib from creating another boot option
> with mBmAutoCreateBootOptionGuid as the opti
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 3:54 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
>
>> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
>> m
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 3:54 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
>
>> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
>> make sure they follow the rules you care about?
>>
>> It is legal from an UEFI spec point of view for
On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
> make sure they follow the rules you care about?
>
> It is legal from an UEFI spec point of view for a platform to edit the nvram
> boot variables based on platform
On 11/05/19 04:24, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> I did not see any example with which one can tell BDS not to
> enumerate a boot option. Can you please point me to an example where
> a protocol (Block IO, Simple FS or Load File) does not get enumerated
> as a boot option?
(I'm going to stat
szlo Ersek
> ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
> ; Gao, Zhichao ; Mike Kinney
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> Ashish,
>
> Just to be clear on your definition of enumerate. In this case it means the
> Boot Manager lib that is just one
J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Ashish,
Just to be clear on your definition of enumerate. In this case it means the
Boot Manager lib that is just one of may implementations a platform could use
to manage
.@redhat.com>>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ashish Singhal
> mailto:ashishsin...@nvidia.com>>; Wang, Jian J
> mailto:jian.j.w...@intel.com>>; Wu, Hao A
> mailto:hao.a...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
> mailto:zhichao@intel.com>
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 4, 2019, at 9:24 PM, Ashish Singhal
mailto:ashishsin...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
Hi Ray,
I did not see any example with which one can tell BDS not to enumerate a boot
...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
> mailto:zhichao....@intel.com>>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> + Mike
>
> With the UEFI driver model, if a d
: Monday, November 4, 2019 7:42 PM
To: Laszlo Ersek ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Ashish Singhal
; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao
Cc: Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
+ Mike
With the UEFI driver model, if a device is not needed by
o; ashishsin...@nvidia.com; Wang, Jian J
> ; Wu, Hao A ; Ni, Ray
> ; Gao, Zhichao
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM
> enumeration
>
> +Ray, +Zhichao
>
> (although, the actual patch seems to be missing from the posting)
>
> Thanks
>
Ersek
> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 3:42 PM
> To: Ashish Singhal ; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> jian.j.w...@intel.com; hao.a...@intel.com; Ray Ni ;
> Zhichao Gao
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM
> enumeration
>
> On 10/31/19 13:42, Ash
M
> To: Ashish Singhal ; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> jian.j.w...@intel.com; hao.a...@intel.com; Ray Ni ; Zhichao
> Gao
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
>> Hello Laszlo,
>>
>> This
: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hello Laszlo,
>
> This is the cover letter. The patch was also submitted.
Can you please state the groups.io permalink for the posted patch, and/or the
Message-Id header for t
On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hello Laszlo,
>
> This is the cover letter. The patch was also submitted.
Can you please state the groups.io permalink for the posted patch,
and/or the Message-Id header for the posted patch?
> Please let me know if you are unable to find it and I'll re
+Ray, +Zhichao
(although, the actual patch seems to be missing from the posting)
Thanks
Laszlo
On 10/30/19 04:47, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Right now, any and every handle with a BlockIO or SimpleFileSystem or
> LoadFile protocol installed on the system is used to enumerate BM
> automatically. The
Right now, any and every handle with a BlockIO or SimpleFileSystem or
LoadFile protocol installed on the system is used to enumerate BM
automatically. There may be cases where on a platform, some of these
are not desirable to be enumerated automatically. This patch adds
support for skipping this au
48 matches
Mail list logo
