BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Groups.io Inc//Groups.io Calendar//EN
METHOD:CANCEL
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
LAST-MODIFIED:20231222T233358Z
TZURL:https://www.tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/America/Los_Ang
From: "jingyu.li01"
Disable Svpbmt extension as SG2042 does not support this feature.
Cc: Sunil V L
Cc: USER0FISH
Cc: caiyuqing379
Cc: dahogn
Cc: meng-cz
Signed-off-by: Jingyu Li
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L
---
Platform/Sophgo/SG2042_EVB_Board/SG2042.dsc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hi, thank you for taking a look at the patch!
This patch can be verified to be working with this app (which was the
motivation for submitting this):
https://github.com/codyd51/uefirc/releases/tag/1.0.1.
I am happy to switch to a tablet device if that's a clearer choice (pending
environment setup/
PR https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5539 has been created.
Thanks
Liming
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io 代表 Aaron Li
> 发送时间: 2024年4月1日 10:32
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; Liming Gao
> 抄送: Bi, Dandan ; Liu, Yun Y ;
> Yao, Jiewen ; Ni, Ray ; Kinney,
> Michael D ; Liu, Zhiguang
>
Hi Ray,
Ha, you mean to move the ConfigureMemoryManagementUint instance into
some LoongArch PEIM, right? I just understood it wrong.
What I want to say is that this API can called in both virtual and
really mechine, if it be moved into the private code, then if other
platform want to call it
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io 代表 Wenxing Hou
> 发送时间: 2024年4月8日 9:47
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io
> 抄送: Michael D Kinney ; Liming Gao
> ; Zhiguang Liu ; Jiewen
> Yao
> 主题: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] MdePkg: Add devAuthBoot GlobalVariable
>
> According to U
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Qingyu
> 发送时间: 2024年4月8日 17:28
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io
> 抄送: Liming Gao ; Michael D Kinney
> ; Zhiguang Liu ;
> Gahan Saraiya
> 主题: [PATCH] MdePkg: Update the comments of GetInformation function
>
> Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, ad
From: DoraX Hsueh
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4665
1. Since installing windows does not meet the minimum system requirements,
Added TPM related code to meet the requirements.
2. Remove FvAdvanced.
Cc: Sai Chaganty
Cc: Rosen Chuang
Cc: Saloni Kasbekar
Cc: Haoyu Tang
Cc:
From: DoraX Hsueh
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4664
1. Updates references to the "PCH_SPI_PROTOCOL" to instead refer to
"PCH_SPI2_PROTOCOL".
2. Updates the library to identify flash regions by GUID and internally
map the GUID entries to values specific to AlderlakeSiliconPkg.
From: DoraX Hsueh
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4662
1. Change MinPlatform MinDsdt to fix hang logo issue.
2. Update SecFspWrapperPlatformSecLib for FSP use.
3. Update SpiFlashCommonLib to fix boot assert issue.
4. Create SmmLocked callback to fix assert
5. Halt the TCO timer to
Abner:
The change is good to me. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
Thanks
Liming
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io 代表 Chang, Abner
> via groups.io
> 发送时间: 2024年4月4日 17:25
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io
> 抄送: Michael D Kinney ; Liming Gao
> ; Zhiguang Liu ; Abdul
> Lateef Attar ; Hao A Wu ; Ray N
Hello,
PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask declared as a PcdsFixedAtBuild type
It means user should recompile source code if he wants to change this pcd
default value.
So, could we declare it as a PcdsDynamic type?
So, user could change PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask's setting value through BIOS
Setup
Chao,
Current patch introduces the CpuMmuInitLib which contains
ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit () API. You told me the API will be called by a
PEIM.
Then, the new proposal is to move the library code into that PEIM.
I don't quite understand your needs of the new GUID to store the memory map
reso
This optional plugin is designed to execute before the FSP SecCore to
rebase SecCore and PeiCore during runtime. If the FSP binary requires
rebasing at runtime, this module should be included within the FSP
binary. Additionally, specific patches must be applied to ensure proper
functionality.
In
Thank you Michael & Gerd, it does the problem of
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2064.
The issue is gone with latest QEMU version.
Thanks,
Jiaxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Kubacki
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 8:55 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wu, Jiaxin ; G
Hi,
Is there any plan to upstream these HEST/ACPI patches? They seem to be arch
agnostic.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117526): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117526
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/8510460
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Locked with
Key State test cases
-Add remaining Assertions 32 - 49 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTe
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Locked No Key
State test cases
-Add Assertions 21 - 31 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G Ed
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock Unlocked State
test cases
-Add Assertions 17, 18, 19, and 20 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLockSetVariable test
cases
-Add Assertions 7 through 16 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G Edhaya
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement MemoryOverwriteRequestControlSetVariable test cases
-Add Assertions 5 and 6 from SCT spec
-Add Test Case to MemoryOverwriteRequestFunctionTest
Cc: G Edhaya Chandran
From: "Abhi.Singh"
SCT spec: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4419
-Implement initial test infrastructure for all test cases
including updates to: CommonGenFramework.sh, UEFI_SCT.dsc,
and Category.ini.
-Add Guid.c and Guid.
Updates after feedback from Sunny
-updated several SCT assertion string outputs
-these were done make the assertions more descriptive
-fixed the issue in patch 5/6 that contained stray chars
from a merge
Patch series:
These tests support platform firmware that implement
MemoryOverwriteRequestCo
Hi Ray,
I'm willing change it to a PEIM if it doesn't fit as a library. I think
if it is a PEIM, we need a new GUID to sotre the memory map resouce, or
use an already defined GUID.
I will put it under the UefiCpuPkg, called CpuMmuInitPei, folder:
UefiCpuPkg/CpuMmuInitPei/LoongArch64/. May I?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:48 AM Qingyu wrote:
>
> Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
> EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
> Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
> Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no d
Chao,
Sorry I missed your mail.
If ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit() is called in PEI, can you move the logic to
a LoongArch specific PEIM? My concern is we may need more review on the lib API
ConfigureMemoryManagementUnit() if we position it as a library.
If we move the logic in a PEIM and the i
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni
Thanks,
Ray
From: Shang, Qingyu
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 17:47
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Pedro Falcato ; Ni, Ray ; Gahan
Saraiya
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] OptionRomPkg: Update the comments of GetInformation
function
Refer to Uefi spec 2.
*Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO*
*When:*
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_OTk1YzJhN2UtOGQwNi00NjY4LWEwMTktY2JiODRlYTY1NmY0%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2246c98d88-e344-4ed
Might be related to this issue
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2064.
On 4/8/2024 4:33 AM, Wu, Jiaxin wrote:
Hi Gerd,
With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
(mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with latest
code to support SMM o
*Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*
*When:*
Monday, April 8, 2024
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZDI2ZDg4NmMtMjI1My00MzI5LWFmYjAtMGQyNjUzNTBjZGYw%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2272f988bf-86f1-
Pushed as 39bb294
> -Original Message-
> From: Hsueh, DoraX
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:48 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
> ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
>
> Subject: [PATCH] AlderlakeOpenBoardP
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Hsueh, DoraX
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:48 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
> ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Alderlake
Pushed as e0051bc
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of
> dorax.hs...@intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:32 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
>
> Subject: [edk
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of
> dorax.hs...@intel.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:32 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Hsueh, DoraX ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> ; Chuang, Rosen ;
> Kasbekar, Saloni ; Tang, Haoyu
>
> Sub
*Reminder: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*
*When:*
Monday, April 8, 2024
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
*Where:*
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZDI2ZDg4NmMtMjI1My00MzI5LWFmYjAtMGQyNjUzNTBjZGYw%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2272f9
Hi Dora,
Removing FvAdvanced in a violation of the MinPlatform specification. The
relevant section is here:
https://tianocore-docs.github.io/edk2-MinimumPlatformSpecification/draft/appendix_a_full_maps/a1_firmware_volume_layout.html#a1-firmware-volume-layout
Please add FvAdvanced back into the
Pushed as 1c41906
> -Original Message-
> From: Shang, Qingyu
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 2:47 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> ; Liming Gao ;
> Dong, Eric ; Gahan Saraiya
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] MinPlatformPkg: Update the comments of
> GetInform
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Shang, Qingyu
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 2:47 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> ; Liming Gao ;
> Dong, Eric ; Gahan Saraiya
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] MinPlatformPkg: Update the comments of
>
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
> Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg: Fix UPD st
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
> Subject: [PATCH v6 2/3] IntelFsp2WrapperPkg: Fsp T new
Hi Chinni,
One minor feedback below. With that change...
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 10:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L ; Chiu, Chasel
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
Does anybody have any suggestions who I should cc as regards this?
Is it preferred to make a bugtracker issue too?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117500): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117500
Mute This Topic: htt
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Marcin Wojtas
Signed-off-by: Qingyu
Signed-of
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Chasel Chiu
Cc: Nate DeSimone
Cc: Liming Gao
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Pedro Falcato
Cc: Ray Ni
Signed-off-by: Qingy
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
This patch series update GetInformation() API signa
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:33:30AM +, Wu, Jiaxin wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
> (mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with
> latest code to support SMM on OVMF or my local command/configuration
> issue?
Have no
Refer to Uefi spec 2.10 section 11.11.2, add a new retval
EFI_NOT_FOUND to EFI_ADAPTER_INFORMATION_PROTOCOL.GetInformation().
Reference: [mantis #1866] - GetInfo() of Adapter Information
Protocol should have a provision for IHV to return no data.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Zhiguang
Hi Gerd,
With below OVMF build and QEMU command, OVMF hangs after SendSmiIpi
(mBspApicId) during SmmRelocateBases(), is there any issues with latest code to
support SMM on OVMF or my local command/configuration issue?
Build (latest edk2 code):
build -p OvmfPkg\OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -a IA32 -a X64
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 02:41:54PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> From: Phillip Tennen
>
> From: Phillip Tennen
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
>
> UsbMouseDxe was missing from the OVMF build description, so=20
> the Simple Pointer Protocol wasn't usable from
50 matches
Mail list logo
