Re: Intent to deprecate: MacOS 10.6-10.8 support

2016-03-18 Thread yuhongbao_386
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:59:20 AM UTC-8, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Terrence Cole wrote: > > > We've had this conversation several times in the last few years and I think > > I've finally figured out why it has always felt subtly wrong. > > > > Our share of use

Re: Intent to switch to Visual Studio 2015

2016-03-19 Thread yuhongbao_386
What about the depreciation of XP SP2? ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Moving XP to ESR?

2016-04-19 Thread yuhongbao_386
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 1:20:56 PM UTC-7, Ted Mielczarek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, at 04:14 PM, Nils Ohlmeier wrote: > > The good news is that dxr does not find anything using IsXPSP3OrLater(). > > But this looks like we have a bit of version specific code in our tree: > > https://dxr.mo

Re: Reverting to VS2013 on central and aurora

2016-05-16 Thread yuhongbao_386
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 2:18:05 AM UTC-7, Emanuel Hoogeveen wrote: > Well, I think that's debatable ;) The Athlon XP had clock speeds of up to > 2333MHz, though I'm sure the per-clock performance doesn't measure up to > current offerings. But Ion can easily be 5x as fast as Baseline. Of cours

Re: Windows XP and Vista Long Term Support Plan

2016-10-24 Thread yuhongbao_386
On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 3:35:20 AM UTC-7, keithga...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 3:12:31 AM UTC-5, Gervase Markham wrote: > > On 22/10/16 10:16, keithgallis...@gmail.com wrote: > > > My concern is that by killing digital certificate updates and TLS > > > updates, still

Re: Turning off window.Components for the web

2013-03-06 Thread yuhongbao_386
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 11:59:02 AM UTC-8, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2013-03-05 1:58 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > > > Is shipping it on nightly+aurora but flipping off on beta+release for a > > >> cycle or two an option? > > >> > > > > > > It would take some fiddling, but I could the appropriat

Re: Intent to unship: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2020-06-25 Thread yuhongbao_386
> [6] https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/64283#164115 shows values for > Release, which puts TLS 1.0 between 0.46% and 0.68% depending on the time > of week. TLS 1.1 is virtually non-existent at 0.02%, we could have removed > that already if it weren’t for the fact that this isn’t how TLS v