Intent to implement and ship: Exposure of Geometry Interfaces to Workers

Summary: Expose DOMMatrix/DOMPoint/DOMQuad/DOMRect to workers and enable structured cloning for them. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1420580 Link to standard: https://drafts.fxtf.org/geometry/ Platform coverage: all Estimated or target release: 69 Preference behind which this w

Intent to implement and ship: webkitURL

Summary: webkitURL will be implemented as a legacy compatibility alias of URL. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1366738 Link to standard: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#url-class Platform coverage: All Estimated or target release: 69 Preference behind which this will be implemen

Intent to unship: DOMQuad.prototype.bounds

DOMQuad.prototype.bounds is planned to be unshipped in Firefox 69. The live `bounds` attribute has been removed from the geometry spec and replaced by standard DOMQuad.prototype.getBounds(). It shows zero usage on web and no other browsers implements this property. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla

Intent to unship: DOMMatrix.prototoype.scaleNonUniformSelf()

The Geometry spec dropped scaleNonUniformSelf() in 2016 to replace it with scaleSelf(). As no other browsers implement this method, it's planned to be removed in Firefox 69. Spec change: https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/commit/99e3212469026b2f2f50926a41912d110a1741b7 Bug: https://bugzilla.mo

Documentation for IPDL needs some edit

I have started to learn about IPDL and am reading IPDL Tutorial (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/IPDL/Tutorial). It looks like the document is old and needs some edits, but this is an area I'm still learning so I want to make sure: 1. Nearly all of the examples lack explicit mo

Re: Documentation for IPDL needs some edit

On Saturday, August 10, 2019 at 11:10:58 PM UTC+9, sasch...@gmail.com wrote: > I have started to learn about IPDL and am reading IPDL Tutorial > (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/IPDL/Tutorial). It looks > like the document is old and needs some edits, but this is an area I'm stil

Re: Documentation for IPDL needs some edit

On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 6:29:01 AM UTC+9, j.j. wrote: > Am Samstag, 10. August 2019 16:10:58 UTC+2 schrieb sasch...@gmail.com: > > I have started to learn about IPDL and am reading IPDL Tutorial > > (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/IPDL/Tutorial). It looks > > like the docu

Re: Documentation for IPDL needs some edit

Okay, thanks for the confirmation! Will do some needed edits. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Document::ResolveWithBaseURI is just introduced to ease URL resolving

Relevant bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1572349 Previous discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.platform/y_eEf14fLu4/ECG_Mq7hAQAJ Based on the previous discussion, I added a helper method to ease URL resolving without forgetting about `document.baseURI`.

Re: How best to do async functions and XPCOM?

On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 7:20:21 AM UTC+9, Geoff Lankow wrote: > Hi all > > I'm redesigning a bunch of Thunderbird things to be asynchronous. I'd > like to use Promises but a lot of the time I'll be far from a JS context > so that doesn't really seem like an option. The best alternative I'