Re: nsAutoConfig

2017-11-01 Thread Mike Kaply
, this is very much supported functionality. It is our primary means > of enterprise customization right now. > > > > The reason there are very few tests is because when it was first > developed, it wasn't possible to write tests that inv

Re: Proposal to remove some preferences override support

2017-11-02 Thread Mike Kaply
When I first read this, I thought you meant the defaults/preferences directory in Firefox. Considering this only worked for true legacy extensions (not bootstrapped extensions), this shouldn't be a problem for enterprise. We double check to sure that no system add-ons need this. Mike On Wed, No

Re: Announcing the next Extended Support Release of Firefox - ESR60 with policy engine

2017-12-21 Thread Mike Kaply
We currently do not plan to allow arbitrary preferences, but if certain preferences are important, we can add policies for them. We could also add policies that set groups of preferences for specific purposes. Mike On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Luke Crouch wrote: > On Wednesday, December 2

Re: Removing tinderbox-builds from archive.mozilla.org

2018-05-17 Thread Mike Kaply
Can we move the builds temporarily and see if it affects workflows over a few months and if not, then remove them? Mike On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Tom Ritter wrote: > I agree with ekr in general, but I would also be curious to discover > what failures we would experience in practice and h