Re: Heads Up: /storage upgraded from version 1.0 to 2.0

On 2017-03-07 7:09 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: While talking about this... I think it's about time we had an actual plan for data cleanup. Last week, when the cloudflare thing happened, I went through the files in my profile looking for all my password-manager-managed passwords and the domains associ

PSA: Requesting specific talos jobs in try syntax is broken on TC

me Thanks, Matthew N. (:MattN) P.S. --rebuild-talos was also broken for a while but should now work again (bug 1317189) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: PSA: Requesting specific talos jobs in try syntax is broken on TC

st (nicely commented, documented) code! The problem I'm seeing only started in the last week or so. Dustin 2017-05-13 14:15 GMT-04:00 Matthew N. : See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1363409 for details. It will still work on Win7 which uses buildbot, but won't on OS X or L

Easier debugging/inspecting of remote tab state with the Browser Content Toolbox

With bug 1401343 fixed, `TabChildGlobal`s for the attached content process are exposed via a `tabs` getter in the Browser Content Toolbox's console tab. This makes it much easier to inspect a remote tab's state or to access privileged APIs rela

Re: Easier debugging/inspecting of remote tab state with the Browser Content Toolbox

On 2017-10-03 5:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 10/3/17 7:15 PM, Matthew N. wrote: For those of you who don't know, when the "devtools.chrome.enabled" pref is true the Web Developer > Browser Content Toolbox opens a toolbox targeting the content process that the selecte

Re: We need better canaries for JS code

Hi David, On 2017-10-18 1:28 AM, David Teller wrote: If I understand correctly, this triggered the usual "undefined is not a function", which was 1/ uncaught during testing, as these things often are; That's only because this code doesn't have any tests. That was filed as bug 1409913. 2/

Intent to Implement and Ship: HTMLTextAreaElement.autocomplete

aces.html has basic interface tests and ​ https://wpt.fyi/html/semantics/forms/the-form-element/form-autocomplete.html tests the common parsing logic (not specific to ) ​Thanks, Matthew N. (:MattN) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Refactoring proposal for the observer service

On 2018-01-04 10:00 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: … 2) How would one shoehorn this into *DL? The options that come to mind are: - Separate methods for every observer topic, which sounds terrible from a code duplication perspective. Though maybe this would be nice for JS clients, so we could say thin

Re: PSA: Avoid Visual Studio 2017 15.7.0

On 2018-05-08 6:40 a.m., Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: Yesterday, Microsoft released Visual Studio 2017 15.7.0. Unfortunately, it is currently not usable for building Firefox due to bug 1458247 (internal compiler errors in WebRTC code). The bug was already reported and confirmed upstream during the 15

Re: Can we make a plan to retire Universal Mac builds?

Assuming our FHR data is gathering correct data: 1.5% of our OS X users are on x86. (There is no date on the dashboard I'm looking at) If we have data on CPU architecture I don't think the OS version is relevant unless I'm missing something. Matthew N. (:MattN) On 2015-08-

Re: Can we make a plan to retire Universal Mac builds?

On 2015-08-05 4:28 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Matthew N. wrote: If we have data on CPU architecture I don't think the OS version is relevant unless I'm missing something. My understanding is that OS version is all that matters. 64-bit apps require a

Re: Telemetry Dashboards

On 2015-08-19 1:59 PM, azha...@gmail.com wrote: Evolution dashboard: Enumerated histograms. Boolean histograms. Histogram dashboard: Keyed histograms. Thanks Anthony! I've been looking forward to reports like these for a long time. Matthew N. (:

Re: Using browser stored credentials for http://mywebsi.de also on https://mywebsi.de

Emma is correct that this is the solution for your problem and we are aware that it's important for the adoption of HTTPS. We already implemented the first half to support the upgrade of the form @action from HTTP to HTTPS in Firefox 41 but bug 667233 is needed to handle the form's origin being

Re: Making it easier to file performance bugs?

Have you considered using bugzilla whine emails to receive a list of all new bugs with that keyword. You could narrow it down to the "Untriaged" component(s) if you wish. Cheers, Matthew N. (:MattN) On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 4:50 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > So, complaints a

Re: Making it easier to file performance bugs?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:33 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > 1/ find a product/component in which to file it (which is the original > issue); Not with the guided bug form that I believe new accounts get, you only need to pick the product and all reports go to Untriaged (for Firefox). > 2/

Re: firefox-ui-tests are now in mozilla-central with TaskCluster support

-chrome? It seems one difference is that some(?) tests run on non-en-US. Could you also add a description to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/QA/Automated_testing? Thanks, Matthew N. (:MattN) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform

Re: Intent to implement: W3C WebAppSec credentialmanagement API

On 2016-03-10 12:07 PM, Ben Kelly wrote: I believe Matthew Noorenberghe had some concerns about the necessity of the API given requestAutocomplete: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/7ouLjWzcjb0/s7aZHGnlAwAJ https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-credential-management/is

Re: Intent to implement: W3C WebAppSec credentialmanagement API

On 2016-03-14 2:02 AM, Mike West wrote: Hey folks! Glad to see that there's interest in this API from Mozilla. :) On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: On 12 Mar 2016 7:28 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" wrote: It should be identical to password manager integration. But it is no

Re: Intent to implement: W3C WebAppSec credentialmanagement API

On 2016-03-14 2:29 AM, Mike West wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Ben Kelly wrote: I believe Matthew Noorenberghe had some concerns about the necessity of the API given requestAutocomplete: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/7ouLjWzcjb0/s7aZHGnlAwAJ https:

Re: Intent to implement: W3C WebAppSec credentialmanagement API

On 2016-03-18 7:22 AM, Mike West wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: On 3/14/16 3:01 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: The actual benefit is something that is only realized once a site puts in the effort required. That is small, yes, but we're seeing sites actively avoid p

Re: Intent to ship: Treat cookies set over non-secure HTTP as session cookies

aven't seen a design for yet but should be less risky to implement than for . It is in the Firefox privacy/security team backlog. Meta bug related to dealing with insecure login forms: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1217142 Thanks, Matthew N. __

Re: Intent to ship: Treat cookies set over non-secure HTTP as session cookies

On 2016-04-18 7:59 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: Could we just disable HTTP auth for connections not protected with TLS? At least Basic auth is manifestly insecure over an insecure transport. I don't have any usage statistics, but I suspect it's pretty low compared to form-based auth. I also don'

Re: Changes to bugzilla "plugins" product

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Emma Humphries wrote: > Andrew, can you do a pass over the bugs since Jan 1st and, and let's > rename this FFx::Add Ons Compatablity so that it's clear it's not plugins. > ​Extensions and plugins are both types of add-ons​ so renaming makes it less clear as it the

Re: Intent to implement and ship: DOMTokenList.prototype.supports

On 2016-05-03 9:01 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: Looking at this code, there's also similar handling for "search", right? Again, not sure whether that's exposed in the default UI. A green plus sign appears above the magnifying glass in the search bar for rel="search" and the menu allows you to add

pushPrefEnv/popPrefEnv/flushPrefEnv now return Promises

the tree which wrote their own Promise wrappers for pushPrefEnv so feel free to file follow-up bugs blocking bug 1197310 to remove them. Cheers, Matthew N. (:MattN) [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197310 P.S. For those of you who didn't hear (since there was no an

Re: Searchfox (new code search tool)

It's more due to lack of mxr-parity rather than usage that is delaying the MXR retirement. See the dependency tree: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1097091&hide_resolved=1 Matthew On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Sebastian Zartner < sebastianzart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On

Re: MXR permanently offline, please transition to DXR

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > We do in the case of 3rd party software referencing files from MXR (and > I'm told there is a lot of this). > ​That's an existing problem which is orthogonal to the MXR decommissioning so that doesn't need to be solved now or block better

Re: Mercurial performance (vs git)

Make sure you have enabled the fsmonitor[1] extension for mercurial if your prompt is using `hg` commands. I believe `mach mercurial-setup` now helps with this. Matthew N. (:MattN) [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/FsMonitorExtension On 2016-08-15 12:46 PM, Botond Ballo wrote: Cross

Re: Reorganization of Firefox-UI tests in mozilla-central

f I was a new contributor working on a UI feature and decided I wanted to write tests, I wouldn't want to be misled into thinking I should write a "Firefox-UI" test when mochitest-browser-chrome is actually the desired suite. I would suggest "puppeteer" or "marionette" for directory names to avoid confusion. Thanks, Matthew N. (:MattN) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Reorganization of Firefox-UI tests in mozilla-central

On 2016-09-02 2:29 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: On 02/09/2016 00:15, Matthew N. wrote: On 2016-09-01 9:24 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: On 01/09/2016 16:37, Henrik Skupin wrote: Do those locations sound good? I have heard at least once that "firefox_ui" might not be the best choice as f

Re: Intent to restrict to secure contexts: navigator.geolocation

On 2016-10-26 1:40 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: At the risk of sounding pragmatic/opportunistic, why not wait until the usage numbers go down, as they're bound to? And in the meantime we could remove the "always allow" option for geolocation over HTTP like we do for another permission (WebRTC

Re: Intent to restrict to secure contexts: navigator.geolocation

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 10/26/16 6:28 PM, Matthew N. wrote: > >> On 2016-10-26 1:40 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >> >>> At the risk of sounding pragmatic/opportunistic, why not wait until the >>> usage numbers go down, a

Re: Deprecating XUL in new UI

Trees are the big thing that come to mind. I've heard about three non-XUL re-implementations (IIRC mostly in devtools) which sounds like a maintainability issue and potentially redundancy. I would rather keep using XUL trees than have even more different tree implementations (though I'd be fine wit

Re: [RFC] Cleaning up sessionstore.js

ing how websites are using DOM storage. To be clear, is that just referring to window.sessionStorage? Cheers, Matthew N. [:MattN] ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Toolkit sub-module Preferred Reviewers who are not Toolkit Peers

Hello, What does it mean to be a "Preferred Reviewer" (previously called a "peer") in a Toolkit sub-module[1] and not be on the list of Toolkit Peers[2]? The Toolkit Code Review page[3] doesn't seem to cover this case. Specifically: 1) Can a "Preferred Reviewer" review code in the related sub

Re: Toolkit sub-module Preferred Reviewers who are not Toolkit Peers

because I forgot to update the appropriate lists. Who do you see who is absent from the peer list? On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Matthew N. wrote: Hello, What does it mean to be a "Preferred Reviewer" (previously called a "peer") in a Toolkit sub-module[1] and not be

Re: Proposed changes to autocomplete administrative levels

On 5/15/14, 8:21 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:> On 2014-05-15, 5:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Brian Nicholson >> wrote: >>> If we disagree with this proposal: >>> >>> What alternatives do we have? Given that countries require more than >>> two administrative lev

Proposal: New BMO Toolkit component for Notifications and Alerts

neral while bugs for (iii) are currently filed in Toolkit::XUL Widgets. I propose the component be named "Notifications and Alerts" in the Toolkit product with the description "Popup/doorhanger notifications, notification bars, and alerts". Tho

Re: Proposal: New BMO Toolkit component for Notifications and Alerts

tifications and Alerts&product=Toolkit&bug_status=__open__ A reminder to watch the component and/or update saved searches if that's relevant to you. Happy bug filing/triaging! Matthew N. :MattN ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-plat

Intent to implement: New HTMLInputElement.autocomplete values

Summary: I am implementing support for @autocomplete values other than "off"/"on" for HTMLInputElement.autocomplete. This allows web developers to indicate how UAs should autocomplete/auto-fill values in the fields (if they choose to do so) so they don't have to use heuristics to guess what dat

Re: Is it time for mochitest-chrome on Android and B2G

On 6/17/14 4:32 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote: Many of those tests don't apply to Android or B2G, and for those that theoretically do, many of them won't work because they rely on XUL files which aren't supported in B2G, and may not be in Android (not sure on that point). I'm told Android uses XUL

Re: Telemetry alerts for histograms

I would prefer a public list available over NNTP like mozilla.dev.tree-management so I don't have to get the large volume of mail in my inbox. MattN On 8/12/14 5:17 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote: What does that alias point to? Seems to me a public mailman mailing list would be a better choice, since

Re: Experiment with running debug tests less often on mozilla-inbound the week of August 25

On 8/19/14 12:22 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote: To assess the impact of doing this, we will be performing an experiment the week of August 25, in which we will run debug tests on mozilla-inbound on most desktop platforms every other run, instead of every run as we do now. Debug tests on linux64 wil

Re: Coming in Firefox 65: Dedicated Profiles Per Install and Profile Downgrade Protection

Our current Firefox migrator (used for a Firefox Refresh) just copies files so wouldn't be suitable for a downgrade scenario as it could introduce problems that we're trying to avoid with this approach. We could rewrite it to be more like other migrators where it would read individual records from

Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1

ntent process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? Thanks, Matthew N. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Fission Engineering Newsletter #1

On 2019-02-13 9:02 p.m., Tom Ritter wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:48 PM Matthew N. wrote: What about doing better sandboxing of the content process (e.g. ensuring a compromised process can't request information from the parent that isn't relevant to it)? Thi

Re: nsIPermissionManager Permission Isolation by OriginAttributes

extId=7 when using the Facebook container. Thanks, Matthew N. (:MattN) ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

`mach test --headless` now supports xpcshell-tests

s will fail under it but don't without --headless so you may want to run a test without the argument if you're seeing an unusual failure that doesn't appear in automation. In that case you could opt the test out of headless mode with `headless = false` in the man

Re: How can I save Push-Notifications on a Windows 10 PC

On 2020-12-30 6:18 a.m., Ronald Brauer wrote: The Push-Notifications of a website are only some seconds on my PC. How can I see them some time after I got them? Once bug 1497425 and its dependencies are fixed then notifications will show in the Windows 10 Action Center until Firefox is closed