Hi all,
Last year, Nika Layzell landed support for implementing XPCOM components in
Rust [1]. Since then, folks on different teams have been adding components,
and working out some common patterns. There are now several in-tree helper
crates that provide more idiomatic wrappers for these patterns,
Thank you very much for sending this out, Marco! I completely agree with
your analysis: allowing system SQLite complicates things for us, and
introduces many sharp edges without benefitting our users. With packaging
conventions changing, it makes even less sense to keep around. I fully
support its
Oooh, this question comes at a perfect time, the Glean team has been
looking at this recently in bug 1627024, too!
Nick's quote from the Oxidation wiki alludes to this, but, if your Rust
code is pulling in Gecko crates like `nsstring`, `xpcom`, and such, I don't
think `RUST_TESTS` will workâyou'd
3 matches
Mail list logo