I like the idea but I’m not sure I agree that non-technical comments are spam,
I think we should reserve that for actual spam. While the information might not
be directly technical it can still be quite relevant and important and if it’s
default hidden that could be overlooked to the detriment o
On 16 May, 2014, at 09:11 AM, Tim Taubert wrote:
> I think it really might make sense to remove the
> preferences altogether
Given our stance on privacy[1] and commitment to Real Choices, Sensible
Settings and User Control; I don’t believe removing the users ability to
control this preferenc
im Taubert
> Engineering Manager, Firefox
> @ttaubert
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
--
Curtis Koenig
Mozilla Corp.
Security Program Manager
On 16 May, 2014, at 09:37 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> The point being made is that the preference is not a real choice. If
> you disable this feature you can still be tracked in the exact same
> way by methods that exist today and are not covered by the preference.
True, but those methods are being
owsingChannel);
>
> channel
> .setPrivate(true);
On 16 May, 2014, at 09:39 AM, Tim Taubert wrote:
> Curtis Koenig wrote:
>> Would this be disabled in Private Browsing? If not that might be perceived
>> as negating one of the reasons users have for using t
If they are public can’t people find them at https://github.com/mozilla/ ?
I know there are private projects that don’t show up and they are likely
private/hidden for a reason.
--
Curtis
On 30 Sep, 2014, at 17:44 PM, Eric Shepherd wrote:
> Last week the idea came up that it would be helpful t
6 matches
Mail list logo
