The 'backlog' (originally known as 'blocking-loop') tracking flag, is
available for bugs in Core::Audio/Video* and Core::WebRTC*.
The flag is no longer used by the groups triaging and working on bugs in
those components, and per a discussion with :drno (Nils Ohlmeier) I intend
to disable setting t
Hi,
In bug 1464782 I renamed the long-shipped offset-* logical properties
(offset-inline-start, offset-inline-end, offset-block-start,
offset-block-end), which map to top / bottom / left / right, to their
standard name (inset-*), and turned the later into aliases.
No other browser implements
In bug 1464782 I renamed these to inset-*, and left the offset-*
properties as an alias behind a (enabled-by-default) pref:
layout.css.offset-logical-properties.enabled
I want it to turn it off by default sooner rather than later, given no
other engine supports it, but keep the pref around f
Outstanding! I love a good IPC attack surface reduction!
Alex
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 6:54 PM Tom Schuster wrote:
> Since landing bug 1465911 [1], CPOWs [2] are only functional on our testing
> infrastructure. In normal builds that we ship to users CPOWs can be
> created, but no operations like
This is great news! Thanks to everybody involved!
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 09:16, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Outstanding! I love a good IPC attack surface reduction!
>
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 6:54 PM Tom Schuster wrote:
>
> > Since landing bug 1465911 [1], CPOWs [2] are only functional on ou
I asked kats@ (which added the list item regarding enums) and he was
fine removing it from the coding style, so given that and the rest of
the thread I've edited the page accordingly.
Cheers,
-- Emilio
On 6/26/18 2:46 AM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
If we can't agree, it shouldn't be in the style g
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In bug 1398482 I'm unprefixing the grid-gap, grid-row-gap, and
> grid-column-gap properties
>
[...]
>
> These properties also applies to Flexbox:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#gap-flex
> We haven't implemented layout for t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
> I asked kats@ (which added the list item regarding enums) and he was fine
> removing it from the coding style, so given that and the rest of the thread
> I've edited the page accordingly.
Not that I'd oppose, but I'll note tha
On 6/29/18 12:15 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
I asked kats@ (which added the list item regarding enums) and he was fine
removing it from the coding style, so given that and the rest of the thread
I've edited the page accordingly.
Thanks for raising these points.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Adam Gashlin wrote:
> * Already vendored crates
> Can I assume any crates we have already in mozilla-central are ok to use?
> Last year there was a thread that mentioned making a list of "sanctioned"
> crates, did that ever come a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Thanks for raising these points.
>
Thanks for the response!
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Adam Gashlin wrote:
> > * Already vendored crates
> > Can I assume any crates we have already in mozilla-central are ok to use?
> > Last year the
11 matches
Mail list logo
