On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> I am talking about requiring SSE2. That is a larger (but still quite small)
> population, but the upside of being able to turn on SSE2 optimizations by
> default is an important benefit. I've discussed and confirmed this with
> Firefox p
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA
Team last week, *May 09 - May 13* (week 19).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Deskt
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>
> For clarification: Does this decision apply to 32-bit x86 Linux as
> well? (It would be sad to have to supply and maintain non-SSE2 x86
> code paths just for Linux.)
>
Nobody asked about that, so it's wasn't specifically included.
IIRC
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> IIRC the Mozilla builds of Firefox for Linux already require SSE2 by virtue
> of their -i686 build targeting, so the real question here is whether we
> want to support distros that don't require SSE2? I'm ok with that, but I
> don't whe
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:53:51PM -0400, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Henri Sivonen
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > For clarification: Does this decision apply to 32-bit x86 Linux as
> > well? (It would be sad to have to supply and maintain non-SSE2 x86
> > code paths just
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 2:18:05 AM UTC-7, Emanuel Hoogeveen wrote:
> Well, I think that's debatable ;) The Athlon XP had clock speeds of up to
> 2333MHz, though I'm sure the per-clock performance doesn't measure up to
> current offerings. But Ion can easily be 5x as fast as Baseline. Of cours
6 matches
Mail list logo
