Hi!
Should these 3 bits of information (trigger reflow, paint or
compositing) also be displayed on each MDN page related to a CSS property?
--
Jean-Yves Perrier
Senior St. Project Manager, Developer Documentation / MDN
On 23/02/2016 21:18, Jordan Santell wrote:
Awhile back, Google's Paul Lewi
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/23/16 4:18 PM, Jordan Santell wrote:
>
>> are there any other suggestions on how we
>> can observe this data and minimize incorrect results?
>>
>
> In an automated way, or manually?
>
> Because you can look at nsStyleStruct.cpp to figur
On 05/04/2016 14:23, Onno Ekker wrote:
> Op 5-4-2016 om 3:09 schreef Philip Chee:
>> I'm using TortoiseHg whichh uses PuTTY and PLINK internally. I've
>> deleted the mozilla host key and accepted the new one.
>>
>> Now I can't push to comm-central via TortoiseHg. I can't push directly
>> via hg.e
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
> It's been a week since I asked for your comments on the plan for triage,
> thank you.
>
> I'm going reply to some general comments on the plan, and outline next
> steps.
>
> Ekt and others said that up to now, individual teams have owned how
On 05/04/2016 09:09, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 23:52, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> We also changed the SSH server config to only support the "modern" set of
>> ciphers, MACs, algorithms, etc from
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Guidelines/OpenSSH#Modern. If you are
>> running an old SSH cl
A change just landed which will change the way crash signatures are
computed for intentional aborts. Previously the crash signature would be
"NS_DebugAbort | ". Now the signature will be "Abort | | ".
This should make it much easier to distinguish various classes of abort.
Thanks to Adrian Gaude
Does this catch MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT and similar? It would be nice to
distinguish those somehow in crash-stats.
- Kyle
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> A change just landed which will change the way crash signatures are
> computed for intentional aborts. Previously the
No, it does not catch MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT, because that doesn't call
NS_DebugBreak and that is what does the AbortMessage annotation[1].
NS_RUNTIMEABORT is the recommended way to reliably crash if you're in
XPCOM-y code.
Bug 1104682 is filed for this, though. I'd love for somebody to take this.
--
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> No, it does not catch MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT, because that doesn't call
> NS_DebugBreak and that is what does the AbortMessage annotation[1].
> NS_RUNTIMEABORT is the recommended way to reliably crash if you're in
> XPCOM-y code.
>
That's un
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:45 AM, James Graham wrote:
> But once we have picked something, can we at least try to remove any UI
> that is more-or-less vestigial given that decision and, at least briefly,
> fight entropy by making things simpler and more consistent, rather than the
> reverse.
Ye
Following up on yesterday's email: I put together a draft second proposal
and shopped it around some, and now I want to bring that back into the main
discussion.
The bullet point version of this is:
* Add a binary field that components can use, TRIAGED (Y/N, T/F, +,-)
* In the case of Firefox rel
Sorry to be dense, but if I understand correctly, you'd like to:
1. Have a policy that all of Gecko needs to triage bugs in a certain way.
2. Redefine how everyone defines priorities?
And you think that 24 hours is enough time to get consensus on that.
Do I have that right?
-Ekr
On Wed, Apr 6
Thanks Benjamin!
Here's a search that shows what those new signatures look like on stage:
https://crash-stats.allizom.org/search/?product=Firefox&signature=%5EAbort&_facets=abort_message&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=abort_message
Please let me know if that seems good or not before we
On 04/04/2016 23:52, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> We also changed the SSH server config to only support the "modern" set of
> ciphers, MACs, algorithms, etc from
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Guidelines/OpenSSH#Modern. If you are
> running an old SSH client, it may not be able to connect.
>
> If
On Wednesday 2016-04-06 18:47 -0700, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Following up on yesterday's email: I put together a draft second proposal
> and shopped it around some, and now I want to bring that back into the main
> discussion.
>
> The bullet point version of this is:
>
> * Add a binary field that
15 matches
Mail list logo
