Re: WebUSB

2015-12-09 Thread Tim Guan-tin Chien
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > Sure. Conversely, I don't find myself convinced by your position. > > > > Would be happy to talk about this live if you think that's useful. > > > > Probably not ... these a

Re: Single- vs. double-precision FP in gfx types

2015-12-09 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > > One interesting thing I found is that a *lot* of the functions that > take an nsRenderingContext or gfxContext do so because they end up > passing it into text run code -- gfxTextRun uses a gfxContext, via > gfxTextRunFactory::Paramete

Re: WebUSB

2015-12-09 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > (4) Have the APIs hidden behind access controls that need to be enabled by > an extension > (but a trivial one). Perhaps you think this is #2. > I realized I don't understand exactly what this means. I assume "extension" means a privileged

Re: Single- vs. double-precision FP in gfx types

2015-12-09 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: >> >> One interesting thing I found is that a *lot* of the functions that >> take an nsRenderingContext or gfxContext do so because they end up >> passing it into text run code -- gfxTextRun uses a gfxContext, via >> gfxTextRunFactory::Par