On 2015-07-06 6:51 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen
wrote:
The tl;dr:
Instead of only having binary "visible" or "hidden" states, we're adding a
middle ground. A Tier 2 option is being added that allows for jobs that
meet most but not all of the
I've filed a bug for enabled Chaos Mode without recompiling:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1182516
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
> On Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 6:15:35 PM UTC-4, Chris AtLee wrote:
> > Very interesting, thank you!
> >
> > Would there be a way to add an en
Any reason not to require this?
- Kyle
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Are we going to have tests for this? Does working include being properly
symbolicated?
But yes, it is extremely annoying to have failures without stacks. (See bug
1165469, which was only figured out once somebody reproduced the test
locally, because there was no stack.)
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Andrew McCreight
wrote:
> Are we going to have tests for this? Does working include being properly
> symbolicated?
>
Working does include properly symbolicated. Tests would be ideal, if
tricky ...
- Kyle
___
dev-plat
It seems like a rather specific requirement. Also, I don't know how well
adding requirements to tier 1 jobs has worked in practice for forcing
change. There are requirements around the allowable amount of
intermittent orange, too, aren't there? And I can't say I've noticed
people jumping up to
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> FWIW, I hacked a python script that does s/aF[Oo]o/foo/
poiru has the tools to do this already, as mentioned above.
> , and MSVC does has
> a code analysis mode that supports an error-on-warn for shadowed variable
> names.
>
> I can take a
On 2015-07-10 1:12 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Andrew McCreight
wrote:
Are we going to have tests for this? Does working include being properly
symbolicated?
Working does include properly symbolicated. Tests would be ideal, if
tricky ...
Is that practical? Our
For quite some time we've wanted unit tests for our test harnesses which
verify issues like correct end-to-end handling of crashes and hangs,
including generation of proper stack traces.
It's not just a per-platform issue, but a per-harness per-platform issue,
so fixing this across the board isn't
A few of us on the perf team (+ Joel Maher) looked at e10s performance &
stability using Talos, Telemetry, and crash-stats. I wrote up the
conclusions below.
Notable improvements in Talos tests [1]:
* Hot startup time in Talos improved by about 50% across all platforms
(ts_paint [2]). This test m
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:59:43PM -0400, Vladan Djeric wrote:
> A few of us on the perf team (+ Joel Maher) looked at e10s performance &
> stability using Talos, Telemetry, and crash-stats. I wrote up the
> conclusions below.
>
> Notable improvements in Talos tests [1]:
>
> * Hot startup time in
Yup, the median shutdown duration for Release 39 users on Windows with
Telemetry is 2.3 seconds for example: http://mzl.la/1HSHiD8
Those are also the kinds of shutdown times I see on my Windows machines
when I have 3-5 windows open with 5-10 tabs each.
What is your experience?
Btw, you can go to a
12 matches
Mail list logo
